Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Voting a Dead Idea - Do we need some other way?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MaryH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:26 PM
Original message
Is Voting a Dead Idea - Do we need some other way?
Seems like it, doesn't it.

If we could run little rovers all over Mars you would think we could come up with something that would work? Should be hack proof and standardized. And fast. None of this standing in line for hours and hours.

Or maybe it should just be whoever can put the most people out on the street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes,,,THUNDERDOME
Two men in, one man out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Auntie's Choice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. MOB RULES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secedeeconomically Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. We have a thrid world voting system
Which benefits politician. And nothing will ever be done about. The system is so rigged that soon enough we will be using Democracy in the past tense when referring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You make a convincing argument
You've convinced me to give up on political activism and dedicate myself to playing computer games. After all if nothing will ever be done about it, there's little reason to get all worked up about it. Is there?

Or did I miss something?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We can do that now and be correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secedeeconomically Donating Member (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Correct what?
States are so gerrymandered now that the outcome is know way ahead of the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dictatorship. I think Bush is working on that right now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, voting is still a fine idea
What we have to do is find competent individuals who don't desperately WANT the job.

If you're talking about the METHOD of voting...what's wrong with a piece of paper and a pencil. Everyone in line could have their ballot filled out and ready to put in the box as they file by.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. The fairest, most reliable, least corruptible form of voting and tallying
Is the good old fashioned pen and paper method, where the votes are handcounted by a bipartisan election commission in public. The only way to corrupt such a system is to "misplace" a particular group of ballots, which can, and does happen with any of the the other methods. But, unlike machine voting systems, pen and paper cannot be rigged to provide the desired result.

If I remember right, Canada still uses this method, and does just fine. The US used this method up until about forty years ago, and it worked just fine. Let us work to bring pen and paper back, rather than fucking around with machines that are easily corruptible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Vote? Vote for WHAT? First we need to kick the corporate money-changers
Edited on Wed Dec-08-04 02:07 PM by AirAmFan
out of the party, and replace them with progressive grassroots movements that collect tens of thousands of $100, $50 and $20 contributions, the way Howard Dean did. Dean or Trippi should be made Democratic Party Chairman.

We need to be able to put tens of thousands of emails into the right mailboxes on a moment's notice, and to turn out hundreds of people into the streets just when news cameras show up. The Republicans have won by serving as an umbrella organization for numerous single-issue organizations that coalesce around various right-wingers selected by big business. Each organization makes a lot of noise about its signature issue: anti-taxing-the-wealthy, anti-choice, pro-imperialism, anti-brown-skinned-immigrant, anti-gun-control, anti-gay, anti-Black, anti-feminist, anti-evolution, yada yada yada.

But the same corporate forces that have paid to amplify right-wing "social issues" have paid Dem pols to SILENCE voices at the other end of the spectrum, on basic democracy, justice, civil rights, education, job training, anti-poverty, and other "class warfare" issues.

John Kerry could have continued his running mate's "One America" theme, but chose instead to play into the "Swift Boat Liars" campaign on "national security". Dems like Chris Dodd (CT) and Jimmy Carter (of the Carter-Ford Commission) don't even speak up when the 'Help America Vote Act' is used to erect structural barriers to the election of Democrats, through lack of national standards for fair voting, selection of unauditable voting devices in Republican-run states, insufficent funding for voting machines, no bilingual voter education, etc.

And in Minnesota, arguably one of the most progressive states in the union, few Democrats even know that 20 percent of young African American men cannot vote in that state because anti-crime hysteria has swept them up into the "injustice" system (see http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2803177 ).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well
You can run a rover over Mars if you put the scientific principals into your effort. If instead you try any old hack method and then believe you can count any vote total with perfect accuracy then you get what we have now. I system that doesn't know the error rate of the machines it uses but expects an error rate of zero. This was the attitude that got the shuttle blown up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC