Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

does anyone know the legitimacy of this email?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RUDUing2 Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:42 PM
Original message
does anyone know the legitimacy of this email?
Did you know..

1. 80% of all votes in America are counted by only two companies, Diebold and ES&S

2. There is no federal agency with regulatory authority or oversight of the U.S. voting machine industry.

3. The vice-president of Diebold and the president of ES&S are brothers

4. The chariman and CEO of Diebold is a major Bush campaign organizer and donor who wrote in 2003 that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year"

5. 35% of ES&S is owned by Republican Senator CHuck Hagel, who became senator based on votes counted by ES&S machines.

6. Republican Senator Chuck Hagel, a long-time friend of the Bush family was caught lying about his ownership of ES&S by the Senate Ethics Committee.

7. Senator Chuck Hagel was on a short list of George W. Bush's vice-presidential candidates.

8. ES&S is the largest voting machine manufacturer in the US and counts almost 60% of all US votes.

9. Diebold's new touch screen voting machines have no paper trail of any votes. In other words, there is no way to verify that the data coming out of the machine is the same as what was legitimately put in by voters.

10. Diebold also makes ATMs, checkout scanners, and ticket machines, all of which log each transaction and can generate a paper trail.

11. Diebold is based in Ohio.

12. Diebold employs 5 convicted felons as developers. These are the people who write the voting machine computer code.

13. Diebold's Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean, was convicted of 23 counts of felony theft in the first degree.

14. Diebold Senior Vice-President Jeff Dean was convicted of planting back doors in his software and using a "high degree of sophistication" to evade detection over a period of 2 years.

15. None of the international election observers were allowed into the polls in Ohio.

16. California banned the use of Diebold machines because the security was so bad. Despite Diebold's claim that the audit logs could not be hacked, a chimpanzee was able to do it!

17. 30% of all US votes are carried out on unverifiable touch screen voting machines with no paper trail.

18. All--not some--but all the voting machine errors detected and reported in Florida went in favor of Bush or Republican candidates.

19. Forida's governor, Jeb, is Bush's brother.

20. Major voting anomalies in Florida--again always in favor of Bush--have been mathematically demonstrated and question by experts. The odds of some of thes amazing voting anomalies were the equivalent of statistical miracles. Was it God? or was it Diebold...?

(please excuse any spelling errors, I was given this as a printout not as an actual email that I could just copy/paste)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. From what I have found - it's almost ALL true...
But I though Chuck Hagel sold that stock off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curlyred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Angry Girl says she wrote the original and has a link posted here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=203x128719

You'll see links there with all the details for each of these statements as well as a link to her website.

As a aside, If she did write this (and I have absolutely reason to doubt her) I am sure Will didn't intentionally quote her work without acknowledgement. He's just not that kind of fellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC