|
I mean, really, apart from the ultra fundamentalists, very few people hold to be true every word in the bible. The evidence of its fallability is overwhelming so much so that even extremely religious, and conservative, people are more likely than not to treat some as the direct word of God, some as good suggestions, and some as parable.
How one can conclude, based on the text itself, which portions to treat as parable and which to not I do not know. Now, I think the text does not include such clues, and that the propensity to hold parts of the bible as infallible, gospel (as it were), truth, and other parts as parable must arise from elsewhere, namely the personal convictions or unique character of each person.
The trouble I have is, that once you allow for any part of the bible to be read as anything other than absolute truth and fact based on extra-biblical factors, then the entire bible become open to interpretation. It can all be treated as mere suggestion and parable, and loses any force it had as authority. For what principle is stopping such from happening?
So, in short, they're just hypocrits. They want to think that the parts they think are important are more important than the parts you think are important. And that's important. :) They don't see that the book is what you make of it, and rigid ideolouges are hardly ever on the right side of history.
By the way, please don't anyone interpret this post as anti-Christian. I am a religious skeptic, and I think organized religion has done about as much harm as good, but religious people, faith, and the moral values of the bible (by and large) are positive things in this world.
|