Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strange-Voiced Whale at Large in the Ocean -Study

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:50 AM
Original message
Strange-Voiced Whale at Large in the Ocean -Study


"http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=753&e=1&u=/nm/20041208/sc_nm/environment_whale_dc"

Strange-Voiced Whale at Large in the Ocean -Study


Wed Dec 8, 2:01 PM ET Science - Reuters



LONDON (Reuters) - A lone whale, with a voice unlike any other, has been wandering the Pacific for the past 12 years, American marine biologists said Wednesday.

Using signals recorded by the US navy to track submarines, they traced the movement of whales in the Northern Pacific and found that a lone whale singing at a frequency of around 52 hertz has cruised the ocean since 1992.


Its calls, despite being clearly those of a baleen, do not match those of any known species of whale, which usually call at frequencies of between 15 and 20 hertz. .....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. sounds like maybe he got kicked in the...
well, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. If its calls "do not match those of any known species of whale", then
how can they "clearly (be) those of a baleen"?

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. By their patterns I guess?
Sounds like the variable here is the higher base frequency.

I am also going to guess that this was a whale with a birth defect, not a new species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. NESSIE!...............................eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Help meee.....help meeeeeeee!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC