Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is much being made of the "planted question" aspect of soldier/Rummy Q/A

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:40 PM
Original message
Is much being made of the "planted question" aspect of soldier/Rummy Q/A
I haven't heard that much, and for some reason when I do, it isn't sticking.

When I first heard Rush talking about the reporter that gave that question to the soldier (was that our own William Pitt?) I was afraid the actual concerns of the soldiers would be buried under an avalanche of "but the question was a plant!"

So am I missing something, or is the media focusing on the equiping of our troops over how the question got asked? I hope so. Support the troops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrustingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. still scratching my head over how a question could be a plant...
Especially in this area of questioning.

but then we Are living in interesting times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. typical of Rush
and all those other wingnuts...blame the messenger. What difference does it make if a reporter helped him phrase the question...the problem is not the question it is that we went to a preemptive war when we wanted and the jerks in the pentagon planned so poorly...or didn't plan at all. We were supposed to be greeted with flowers and candy...not one of these jerks has even acknowledged they might have been a tad wrong. :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's the same old repug strategy
Edited on Fri Dec-10-04 09:56 PM by ailsagirl
The repugs/ms media circulate the story that it was a plant to deflect attention from the real issue!!!

They're good at that and most people fall for it.

BTW, that's a fantastic portrait of Kerry

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here's where I got it from
Credit where credit is due:

'JOHN KERRY, APRIL 1971,' by Elizabeth Peyton, Gavin Brown's
Enterprise, 620 Greenwich Street, at Leroy Street, West
Village, (212) 627-5258. Part of a portfolio of 14 works
commissioned by Artforum magazine for its September issue.

It was in the NYT right before the RNC. I fell in love, copied it online and clipped it out of the paper.

I wonder if prints are for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It is a very nice portrait of Senator Kerry
And also I think it is a decoy from the repubs/ms to try to create some weird kind of 'reasonable doubt' about what the question to Rumsch. actually was about.

Digression:
Kerry looks best when he's serious. He makes a very good impression when he's talking from the heart - same heart that made him question his own actions after the Vietnam war.
He really doesn't have to resort to cheap media tricks like looking into the camera, because he's not the kinda guy that is favored by style and posh.

Best served natural! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Forgot the pic - here


Good picture? It's from a speech in Washington early in the campaign, I think.

And great stucco, with the lights and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Here are my favourites, though




And look at all the happy and cheering Dems - marvellous :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Streetdoc270 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. The question MIGHT have been a plant
but the cheers, 'Huoops' and applause were spontanious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. and the question had real merit, no matter where it came from
It appears to me that the Bushies are having a hard time deflecting blame or attention on this issue. Mwahahaha! Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly-- but, you know the repugs-- deflect anything
that might make them look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. CNN said the reporter made the soldier do it


The soldier didn't appear to be afraid of saying it.
CNN is saying what the soldier said about the land mines and the rest has not been proven.

They have ROVED it already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. exactly
you cannot claim THAT was preplanned in any way! Those guys echoed the sentiments of that question with their applause...otherwise, Rumsfeld might have not even taken the time to answer the question and found a way to blow it off or divert to another topic...

theProdigal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Republican definition of the word "Plant"
Edited on Sat Dec-11-04 10:28 PM by goclark
is...

A question that was not carefully approved and given to a soldier by their side.

All those that have anything negative against the war are labeled "plants."

I just wish we could get more plants to surprise them at just the right moment!

I would love to have someone ask GWB," Why didn't you send the twins to Iraq to serve their country without proper equipment?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Planted or not, the soldier still said it. He didn't have to...
I would think that the soldier had to agree to the question in order to say it if it was true that it was planted.

To me, who cares, the point is, he said it. There are problems over their and the repukes continue to keep their heads in the ground.

I bet you this is the first of many questions like this to come.

Once one person asks, others will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. I think the fact that the reporter's e mail showed genuine concern for the
troops rather than just trying to make Rumsfeld look bad is deflecting a lot of spinmeisters. After all they beat up on Kerry for "denying armor to the troops" during the elections, so this kind of makes them look hypocritical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC