Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1st time ever - Bush Master gun Manufacturer found guilty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:27 AM
Original message
1st time ever - Bush Master gun Manufacturer found guilty
The makers of the gun used by the DC snipers were found guilty and are ordered to pay up to 3.5 million dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Many facts wrong in post


1. Settlement was $2.5 million.

2. $2 million was from gun shop where weapon was purchased.

3. The suit was for allowing the gun to be sold to an ineligible person -supply chain negligence.

This is not a case where they alleged that the gun itself was bad, rather the way it was sold it was bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is this the Bush lover from Maine?
---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. All gun manufacturers are now more vulnerable
This is a precedent since no gun maker has ever been found guilty before.

I hope a book comes out about this such as...
Unsafe at any caliber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No they are not
1. It was a settlement, not a judgment. There is a difference. No precedential value for a settlement. No wrongdoing is acknowledged.

2. Precedent usually only attaches at appellate level.

3. This would only apply in Washington state. It was a Washington state court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donhakman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanks to the lawyer
It certainly is a welcomed settlement.
When so many settlement amounts have been sealed it is good to see this one out in the open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncle ray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. guilty of what?
having an illegal immigrant houskeeper?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC