Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why there will be no draft before the 2006 elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:53 PM
Original message
Why there will be no draft before the 2006 elections
First off, the Repukes need to consolidate their power. They are going for a filibuster-proof Senate and a draft gets in the way, so it is politically unfeasible to have a draft before the 2006 elections.

Right now, recruitment for the Army, the Army Reserves, and the Army National Guard is in dismal shape, but recruitment for the Air Force and the Navy and respective Guard and Reserve units are doing just fine, thank you very much.

Here's how they avoid the draft before the midterms. First, they enact the Defense Forces Re-Alignment Initiative. What's this, you ask? Simple, first they call for volunteers to transfer from the Air Force and Navy to the Army and Marines. No loss of grade, just new training. Phase II they begin forcing the move. You signed up for the DoD, so it doesn't alter your contract at all, the DoD owns your ass. Then they sneak in something to get as many volunteers as possible, if you volunteer, you keep your current rank and pay grade, if they have to move you unwillingly, you lose one stripe and the pay that goes along with it.

Watch for this. It is a "back door draft" that moves through the front door, and they will do it! What's worse is the draftees will lose pay they got for their initial volunteer hitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. We all thought Kerry would win in a landslide too.
No more precognitive rubbish for me. One way or the other.

Not that that won't stop me or any of us, but whatever is said by anybody (including me) will be taken with grain, if not a bucket of salt.

You might be right and it does make sense. But one terror attack and some smooth talking will get the busheeple to think that we need a draft to protect corporate america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I never thought Kerry would win in a landslide
and said so many times here.

There will be no draft before 2006. Bank on it. There are too many troops aiting in the Air Force and Marines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex146 Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. They already have Air Force people
driving trucks in combat zones. Or so I've heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well W. you could be right.
Now: let's go over some numbers. How many people do we have in the a) Army b) Air Force c) Navy d) Reserves. How many do they need to move over when they are needed?

I believe I read somewhere (probably here, where else?) that we currencly have 1.1 million active people in the military. Is this enough? Do they need to start the draft?

I'd say it all depends on their plans. If they plan to invade Syria or Iran, I'd say it would be tough. Because keep in mind that all this comes with a cost. Wars ain't free. We're currently spending $5.8 billion per month in Iraq ALONE. We're teetering on the brink of bankruptcy as it is.

Everything has its cost (smiles). Right RumsFailed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. 1.1 million will be plenty so long as they do not invade another country
prior to the 2006 elections.

If Iran makes a move into Iraq, all bets are off and Bush will have a built in excuse to reinstitute a draft while blaming it on the Iranians, however, if the Iranians have the bomb, an invasion of Iraq might make military sense.

Soooo, if they just continue the occupation until after the midterms, everything should be fine for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC