I need some help here - is this guy for real or is he spoofing me?

[KDLarsen]

>>Look at Dan Rather who was finally fired...or quit, yeah whatever, >> Rather is another liar, Rather would lie so much it would give an >> aspirin a headache.
>
> Ah yes, the infamous Rather-gate, because CBS couldn't verify some
> documents that didn't really add much to the fact that Bush skipped
> National Guard duty during wartime.

Would be interesting, if true. But we all know Bush earned all the hours
and exceeded his obligation, he skipped nothing but was exceptional.

In fact the mainstream liberal media MLM, failed to make widely known the
fact that Bush tried at least 2 or more times to fly missions in Vietnam, he
volunteered for combat operations!

Its so amazing how Bill Clinton was literally an admitted draft dodger, went
to England and defamed, insulted and spat on the name of the US military,
later to become commander in chief of that same US military??

Then we had Sen Kerry who admits to being a war criminal and lies about the
US militarys role in Vietnam, and spat on the military and brave, decorated
soldiers, Kerry bragged for decades how he threw away his medals, but you
democrats praise him also?

But you have actual, real, honorable soldiers like President Bush and you
find it correct to insult and lie about his record? You defend Dan Rather,
proven to be a liar in such things as his 1988 Vietnam documentary? Many
"soldiers" he interviewed turned out to be liars, never doing things they
claimed, they described events of war crimes that never took place? Now the
DNC launches a campaign against Bush, and supposed documents appear from
about 1970 that have the 66 and 99 quote marks which typewriters didnt use,
nor did they use proportional spacing, but the documents, typed on Microsoft
Word and held up to the light? were an exact match. Since I did typing in
the 1970s its obvious to me also

Since democrats want power, and have no leadership and no morals? All they
can do is use Hollywood to invent trouble and throw mud and allege and smear
the names of honorable people. How much better America would be without
all the wasted time, frivilous lawsuits, ruined characters and blocked
legislation by democrats.

You probably think Joe McCarthy 1950s/60s was a bad person? Or that Nixon
was a bad president? No, they were both very honorable men who served the
USA well, but were targets of massive, $billions of dollars of character
assasination effort by democrats and *, writing up slander into books,
encyclopedias, documentaries, all hoping that YOU wont check what actually
happened

------

The top was what he wrote, I then replied & then he gave me the full svada. I'm quite frankly speechless - is this guy serious or what?

[yorgatron]

1. nixon and mccarthy were heroes?

:wtf:

[Florida_Geek]

2. Yes IBM did have typewriters that

did, proportional spacing in the 50s/60s and his BS about Bush volunteered for combat operations ask him to show you proof of that lie.

[shraby]

3. The guy is full of bull sh*t up to his eyebrows.

I'm old enough to remember a bit of that history he is trying to rewrite.

Next he'll try to say that Hitler was misunderstood and that the holocaust never happened.

edited to add.

[MichaelHarris]

4. A person could write

volumes alone on McCarthy and his drunken tirades. All I can offer in short term responses is ask "your friend" if it was the "liberal" media that censured McCarthy or the Senate and Congress. Also have him look up Joe's flying record he touted around during his campaign, he said he had one unfortunatly, like bush no one can find it.

[VOX]

5. The guy is a fountainhead of right-wing, shopworn talking points...

Ann Coulter :puke: has been trying to make the case of "Joe McCarthy, Great American" for some time now.

And always be aware of the phrase "frivilous lawsuits." That one is right out of the right-wing playbook.

Don't even bother with replying.

[0rganism]

6. Ya know, the form where bush asks not to be sent to Vietnam is online

http://www.awolbush.com has it all laid out for you.

Just compare and contrast.



Your counterpart is just wacking off to the standard anti-Kerry/pro-bush talking points. Nothing unusual.

[Crunchy Frog]

7. Yes he is.

And why do you even bother to engage with these fascist lunatics? It's not like the ones with that sort of mentality are open to persuasion. The only thing you'll accomplish is raising your blood pressure IMO.

[KDLarsen]

8. I really tried not to..

.. however, that lunatic appeared in the middle of a discussion on Alt.TV.Simpsons - and I felt that I had to repsond to his "Dan Rather is a big fat liar".

Thanks for the ideas guys - I think I'll just hit him with the documents posted further up.