Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strib's Nick Coleman: The gospel truth about some readers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 02:07 AM
Original message
Strib's Nick Coleman: The gospel truth about some readers
Nick Coleman: The gospel truth about some readers

Star Tribune
Published December 17, 2004

Many people say Christians are under siege this Christmas from godless types who want to give us a black eye. I don't buy it for one simple reason: No one knows how to give us Christians a bigger black eye than the people who call themselves Christians.

This week, a number of my fellow Christians took time from worship to criticize a column I wrote about the homeless. They didn't write to tell me about their concern for the 8,000 homeless in Minnesota or the fact that half of them are women and kids or that 100 of them died this year. No, they wrote to say that even though we will always have the poor with us, as Jesus said, that doesn't mean those poor buggers shouldn't get out of the way of our SUVs.

"These homeless are bums, nothing but leeches on society," wrote a guy who signed himself Trav. "If we could push a button and make the homeless die and disappear without repercussions, nearly everybody would do it. I would. Good riddance."

(snip)

"After all," I wrote, "Once upon a time, a homeless couple came to Bethlehem, looking for shelter."..I thought it was pretty straightforward: The Gospels stress the strong identification Jesus had with the poor. But sharp-eyed Christians saw through the scriptural smokescreen to reveal my agenda: There I went again, shoving liberal dogma down their mouths. Thankfully, the righteous are smart. Especially the self-righteous.

"Your allegation that Mary and Joseph were homeless is just a plain lie," wrote Jerry. "They were no more homeless than you would be if you showed up at a posh hotel without a reservation and were turned away." "Joseph and Mary were NOT homeless," wrote Steve. "They were forced to go to Bethlehem by Caesar Augustus, who undoubtedly was the world's first liberal Democrat."

Wow, that's right (picture me slapping my forehead)! It's coming back to me now: Caesar built the Roman roads, conquered Gaul and traded on his friendship with Jesse Jackson to get appointed secretary of labor in the Clinton administration! ..But dang me, I left out the important part: Mary and Joseph weren't homeless; they were just being shoved around by Democrats. And it's only because the Democrats have been laid low by Republicans that we are hearing anything about homeless scum now.

More..

http://www.startribune.com/stories/357/5141957.html

Nick Coleman is at ncoleman@startribune.com.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoBlue Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just more fuel for my hypothesis
That Christians themselves are the best evidence that the basic premise of Christianity is hypocrisy. Jesus may well have been as fine a man as there ever was, but he can't save anyone from the curse that thye themselves, and not God, put on their souls.

Cheers and Happy Holidays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not even about hypocrisy--
it's is all about corruption. The premise of Christ's teachings is good--treat others as you would have them treat you. That is the only law he gave mankind. These people are selfish and corrupt to the core, not willing to give of themselves to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. My theory is that the more people rely on their "good deeds"
the worse they are. Thus, if they go to Church every Sunday, they think that this frees them to behave atrociously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. the older I get, the more profound Life of Brian becomes
Sure, as a kid, I laughed at the zany and rique humor. As a grown man, I can more fully appreciate their parody of human nature. Blessed are ALL manufacturers of dairy products, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. nick coleman's a bigoted asshole who trades on stereotypes.
when the twins played the braves in the '91 world series, he let go with every anti-southerner stereotype in the book in a lame attempt to show how witty he is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. What that's got to do with this one? And if you have to go back 13 years
to give an example than perhaps the problem is yours.

We all make mistakes and we change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. no, i think the problem is pretty much mr. coleman's.
but hey, in a lot of folks' minds there's not a thing wrong with bashing southerners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That series was Minnesota's first exposure to the
"tomahawk chop" and that obnoxious noise the Atlanta fans made while "chopping". Many of us found it annoying and racist and it's probably what precipitated any comments Coleman made at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. they don't have televisions in minnesota? it wasn't till the world series
that they heard about what other teams do in baseball?

wow.

the tomahawk chop could be labeled racist by some. but so could the way many in minnesota treat native americans on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC