Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanctions against media threaten public's right to know

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnIndependentTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:08 PM
Original message
Sanctions against media threaten public's right to know
http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=18258

Information freeze
Sanctions against media threaten public's right to know


WASHINGTON -- Dear citizens, are you feeling the chill?
There is a quiet campaign being waged against your right to know things. God forbid that ordinary folks should learn more about what government officials and others among the powerful might be up to. Consider a few episodes of a larger story.

In Rhode Island, Jim Taricani, a television reporter, has been sentenced to six months of home confinement for his refusal to say who leaked him a secret FBI videotape of a top aide to former Providence Mayor Vincent A. Cianci Jr. taking a bribe. The home confinement -- a sentence issued even after Taricani's source had outed himself -- was supposed to be a compassionate gesture. Taricani, 55, had a heart transplant in 1996 and jail time might have jeopardized his health.

Some compassion. As The Associated Press reported earlier this week, "Taricani is not allowed to go outside of his North Kingstown home -- not even to his back yard. He can seek medical care, but he can't work, use the Internet or appear on radio or television. He must wear a strap around his ankle so that his movements can be monitored."

This is the reward for giving the public evidence that a leading politician was on the take. Feel the chill yet?

Last week, Army officials barred Denver Post reporters from Fort Carson in Colorado. Were the scribes getting in the way of our troops? Nope. The Army was angry because the newspaper had published a story about soldiers who were unhappy with their health care.

Lt. Col. David Johnson, Fort Carson's public affairs spokesman, said the paper faced temporary suspension of its journalistic rights "as a direct result of Fort Carson not being given fair and balanced treatment in a story that appeared on Dec. 5, 2004." The Denver Post reported on mentally and physically ill National Guard and Army Reserve members who said they were being pushed out of the service without disability pay.

Fort Carson's ban was subsequently lifted, but the message was sent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. We must help the journalist to keep freedom of the press in USA

WE must organize with in DU and beyond to be a force to recken with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleiku52cab Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unfortunately, it can be a two edged sword
Edited on Sat Dec-18-04 08:30 PM by pleiku52cab
That bastard Novak is still hiding behind freedom of the press to protect those slime bags who 'outed' Valerie Palmer(sp?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. har, har, har. This is funny. They should have used their rights
when they had the chance. Now, no one cares to help them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC