Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right Wingers are calling tbe baby cut from the womb in Missouri

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:04 AM
Original message
Right Wingers are calling tbe baby cut from the womb in Missouri
as eight months old. Uh, have they talked to the IRS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now that the baby is born they can forget about the baby. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. You nailed it...
As Randi says, love the fetus, hate the children. That's the Republican creed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puddycat Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. most of those freepers are sick, twisted individuals
they don't mind bombing and blasting the faces off of little Iraqi school children, but they will defend the life of embryos and fetuses with passion. What depraved hypocrites they are. A sicker bunch of people are not to be found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can you explain your post to me?
Either I'm dense or just tired, but I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. it was an 8 mo.old fetus which equates to fundies as an 8 mo. old
fully developed baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. What are you looking for?
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 01:13 AM by Erika
The baby who was cut out of her mother's womb at eight months was considered as an eight month old by right wingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. don't worry, I didn't either...
had to read it 3 times, but after that I realized there was nothing wrong with the original message, I just simply didn't get it at first :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Retards. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. So are they going to subtract nine months from their Birthdays and
start calling that their Conception day or something?

Here is your cake and ice cream.:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hadn't heard this logic before. They really take this fetus=baby
thing 100% seriously. Maybe some day soon we will all be adding 9 months automatically to our age since we will be counting our "life" from conception versus birth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm not real good at math
How do you cipher that if you're born on a leap year? :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. LOL, just look at it as trying to figure out your day of conception
Edited on Sun Dec-19-04 01:32 AM by barb162
( ask mom) and it will all work out. If you turned 20 today, you are really 20 years and 9 months old. Unless you were a preemie of course, then you are 20 years and something less than 9 mos. Gee I think conception dates are going to start to get very important. Birth certificates will cease to exist and they will be called conception certs. This is going to be a real riot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Would that beHappy, Happy Screw day! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, that is what it would be, but they will call it " happy conception
day" or clean it up in some fashion to where it is suitable for their taste. The birth won't be called the birthday but maybe the coming out day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #26
32. Or a debutante?
Debutantes "come out" around age 21.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. But what happens in the case of a natural miscarriage?
Which is forward looking. Do we judge the mother on her health habits and determine if she has committed a crime? Did she smoke, drink, etc. Was she able to eat decently and receive proper natal care? Did the father provide?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. This has actually been proposed by right-wingers
There have been proposed laws that would find a mother guilty of child abuse or even murder if they had a miscarriage and it could be proven that she did something wrong - like drank, took drugs, didn't eat enough fruits and vegetables, didn't pray often enough, didn't pray to the right God, didn't etc....

Of course, if the pregnant woman doesn't have health insurance and has no access to prenatal care then that is perfectly fine with the Republicans.

If the pregnant woman develops diabetes or hypertension as a result of not having prenatal care and ends up in the hospital with her life in danger, the only thing the Republicans care about is protecting the fetus, even if the mother has to die. Under no circumstances is the mother allowed to abort the baby, even if she will otherwise die.

Such are the "family values" of our ruling political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. I guess then they would say the fetus (baby) died and I have
already seen, as we all have, over the last few years, how coke-addicted mothers get in trouble with the law for harming the "baby"

To me the almighty "they" would have to definitely do laws protecting the fetus/baby from actions by the mother potentially harmful to the baby, like smoking, overeating, drinking, using other drugs, etc. If fetus= baby they will have to do these laws monitoring the mother. It will be a real can of worms because how many women know they conceived until they miss their period. A woman better not drink alcohol until she gets her period as she may be pregnant and harming the "baby."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. What about environmental pollution causing birth defects and miscarriages?
Does that mean that the companies that pollute are liable for the murders of fetuses?

Whoops! Not according to Republican logic! Only poor women are liable. The corporations get a pass even when they knowingly break environmental laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. if a woman knows she is pregnant, she may have to move from the
pollutants too. All pregnant women will have to move away from LA, Chicago, NY, etc. because of too much ozone and other pollutants It just goes on and on.

If the fundies try to carry this "scheme" out, there will be a lot of pregnant mothers in jail for harming the fundie concept of fetus=baby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Oh good, now we can get rid
of the 'jesus birthday' christmas thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
41. When it comes time to collect my social security I will
remember this. I'll be able to collect @ 94 and 3 mos. instead of 95.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. So i gues the little booties for six month old infants are no good anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. Sure they are
You just have talk the mother into the surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't think this is LBN material n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. technically, you could say it was (negative)one month old
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. in China, aren't children considered to be 1 year old when they're born??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I dunno, but this isn't China. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Royal Observer Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
51. Maybe
they are Chinese fundies. That would explain it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. I think the concept is
that you are living in your first year.

We don't call it "zero", but we state the age in months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
52. that is common
in some Asian countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. You think the IRS will buy it for deductions?
Or how about it for voting age or the age for SS purposes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
53. For tax deductions, the answer is yes....
whether it was 8 months old or 8 hours old when it was "born" on December 16, it still would have been born in 2004, hence a tax deduction for the 2004 tax year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. Nine months is an average, it's X days old where X is the number
of days ago it was cut from its mothers womb and
started breathing atmosphere. These fundies are
so incredibly stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. With the right wing fanatics in power who knows.
But I doubt if the IRS will allow a tax deduction on a child in the womb. Right wingers must occasionally look at reality. It's not something they do with comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowdogintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. IRS will allow the baby on the father's taxes, it was born prior to
12/31. That's the rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masjenkins Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. i had a conversation with a 17 year old bushite tonight and was shocked...
I was basically saying that this was one of the creepiest stories I had heard of late ( although...according to other sources i have heard on the "news".. it's not so unusual for this to happen. Seems there is a big fetus stealing thing thats sweeping the nation ..murdering the mom in the process.. no big deal, apparently....SERIOUS) ANYHOO.. he was comparing it to abortion and couldn't understand why liberals were so upset about this incident. Then suggested that I watch that movie "Silent Scream" and see how executions happen. (abortions) This kid is 17!!! What is wrong with this picture???? I am moving to Venus, first chance I get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fleabert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. any links or references for the 'not so unusual for this to happen' part?
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masjenkins Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. just heard a blurb on the news when this was first reported
Something to the effect of "apparently this isn't so uncommon"... thats all I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. this happened about 2 yrs. ago in the Chicago area and it was
big news. They caught the people that did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
48. your link
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041219/ap_on_re_us/pregnant_woman_slain




Killings of pregnant women are more common than many people realize, The Washington Post reported in Sunday's editions after a yearlong examination of death records.

Using state data and other sources, the newspaper documents the killings of 1,367 pregnant women and new mothers since 1990. It said there were undoubtedly more deaths, and that 13 states said they had no way of knowing how many such deaths occurred.

The Post said several statewide studies have found pregnant women more likely to die of homicide than of any natural cause, and that the deaths cut across racial and ethnic groups.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercover Owl Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. never mind a dumb 17 yr old....
Just let the 17 yr old see your wilted-yet-amused facial expression, and go about your business. At that age, you can't take them seriously.

Yes, this definitely IS worse and more depraved than any legitimate abortion I've ever heard of!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hickman1937 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. 1 more month and he'd have hated it.
Someone needs to make a movie called Not So Silent Scream. Pictures of raped and murdered impoverished children. The ones repuke antiabortionists left behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercover Owl Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
36. It's still fucking SICK, no matter what!
There is no minimizing the depravity of this, people. The woman didn't want to lose her baby. This is fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sans qualia Donating Member (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
37. What will it be like for that girl to know the circumstances of her
um, "birth?" I can't even imagine. That poor child. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. Well, it is better that they found her now
It would be worse to be an older child and find out that the people who you thought were your parents, really weren't. You weren't adopted either. They killed your mother and abducted you.
I think I remember hearing about a story or two where a child was abducted as a baby and raised by the abductors as their own. They later found out and were devestated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
38. So, what is the correct date for the birthday of this unfortunate child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. I'd say, probably, Dec 16 or 17
I am suprised the baby survived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. My nephew and his wife knew the couple...they are
devastated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
47. Ah! So now we have tax deductions at conception?
How cool is that? Think of the money that people will save! :eyes: Fucking idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-19-04 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
50. Was it a boy?
Bush is looking for young recruits for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC