Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a serious question for us Christians

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 12:26 AM
Original message
I have a serious question for us Christians
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 12:37 AM by Sara Beverley
Jesus was the oldest of how many children of Mary? Does the scripture speak of Jesus' brothers and sisters? Does it speak of any siblings older than Jesus? I have searched the texts and it really isn't clear.

Edit: Thanks for making me ask the question correctly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CaptainCorc Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. hi. i have a link for you
and a snip:

Without a doubt, these siblings mentioned in scriptures are exactly that. Now, it remains to yet be determined if these children are Joseph's from a prior marriage, or if they are the offspring of Mary and Joseph. The Protoevangelium of James indicates that Joseph had children, and in paticular, two sons. However, it mentions nothing of any other children that the scriptures speak about. The scriptures in Matthew 13:55, list four sons by name. The four brothers are named James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas. Then the verses also tell of sisters. Not just one sister, but sisters. (Side note: Jude, author of the New Testament epistle ascribed to his name, according to some traditions is also a brother of Jesus.)

end snip

http://www.christiansteps.com/doctrine/jesus_siblings.html

hope it helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I still don't get it. The scriptures are confusing if you read them
for yourseld instead of having someone preach to you what they say and mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainCorc Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah I should have warned you :)
I didn't take the time to read all the stuff that was on that page. It's not an area of interest for me. I got the impression from what I glossed over that there are varying opinions on the subject.

I don't mean to be critical of you, but once you stop just swallowing what somebody preaches to you and start wondering on your own, there's bound to be a bit of confusion. Don't despair. That is a good thing. Or at least it ought to be.

I'm sorry I wasn't much help. As I said, it's not an area of interest to me and so I will refrain from telling you what little I am familiar with (trust me, you're not missing much).

Good luck in your search. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. The opinion of an amateur historian
As I understand it, Matthew 13:55 and Mark 6:3 name James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas (Didymus) as 'brothers of Jesus.' However, Matthew 27:56 only names James and Joseph as sons of Mary.

The listed Judas, also known as Jude, is a bit of a mystery. Depending on who you ask, he's either a son of Joseph Sr. by a previous, unmentioned marriage, a cousin of Jesus on Joseph Sr.'s side, or Jesus's twin. He may also be listed as part of a translation mistake: in the Greek version, it was common to name someone along with their father, i.e. Judas of James. Apparently, however, a mistake was made in the creation of the Geneva Bible which was in turn passed on to the KJV, in which this was interpreted as 'Judas, brother of James.' Add this same sort of speculation to Simon.

There are also references to two sisters, but I don't know their names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Judas Didymus
Didymus is Greek for 'twin', and IIRC also Judas is the Arameic/Hebrew(?) for 'twin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Uh oh, you just had to go there. Gnostic gospels, eh?
When searching for truth one may find at least information.
When not searching for truth one surely finds propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aneerkoinos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Who is searching?
Sure, I've read some of the Nag Hammadi texts, and their commentary is where that bit of trivial info stuck to my head. Is that an area to be avoided, or what is the point of your post?

I have no idea of what relevance that bit of info has on the question at hand, but it might be relevant. On the other hand, I'm much less certain that Jesus was historical person than I'm certain that e.g. Apollonius of Tyana was historical person, I just try to keep open mind about the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. James
brother of Jesus, first bishop of Jerusalem, killed on the temple steps. Led to the last sack of Jerusalem by the Romans (to quell the continuing violence and gain control).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUDUing2 Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. several different beliefs...
The two main ones are:

1. Mary was a permanent virgin..she and Joseph never had any children together. The brothers and sisters of Christ were either children from an earlier marriage of Joseph (he is believed to be an older widower) and/or cousins of Jesus..in aramic the words for cousin and siblings were very close and easily confused in translations..

2. Mary and Joseph had a normal marriage after the birth and Jesus and had other children.

The main *evidence* that Mary had no other children is that she was with Jesus during his ministry and when he died on the cross he made sure that she was taken care of...and the one who he named has never been considered to be a *brother* of Jesus...if she had other children then there would have been no need to name a *guardian* for her..this seems to point to James being a cousin not a true brother of Jesus...

check out this site for more info
http://www.catholicherald.com/saunders/97ws/fs970116.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC