Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pagan whodunnit grips village

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 09:56 AM
Original message
Pagan whodunnit grips village
Times
Pagan whodunnit grips village
By Adrian Lee



IT IS a whodunnit worthy of Agatha Christie. The tiny English village, the victim found lying on the floor of its isolated church and everyone in the community under suspicion.

No murder was committed. In this mystery, the figure on the floor was that of an erotic pagan carving that had stood undisturbed in the church for eight centuries. It was attacked with a chisel and left in more than a hundred pieces. .....................

So, as they ponder the puzzle, the would-be Miss Marples in the 200-strong community of Wiston, West Sussex, have taken up the case. One parishioner has deduced, from the chisel marks, that the culprit must have been left-handed.

The rare stonework, of a figure with its genitals exposed, is believed to have served as a warning against lust. It is not clear whether the 8in figure, carved over an archway at All Saints Church, Buncton, was male or female.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,170-1409682,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. How very... Taliban-ish of the person or people who did this.
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. uh..... "genitals exposed" AND
they don't know if it's male or female? :shrug:

sheltered englishpeople I guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Could have been ambiguous
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 10:09 AM by spinbaby
Could have had parts belonging to both sexes.

On edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. if this is the carving in question, I have trouble comprehending
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 10:45 AM by lectrobyte
the "genitals exposed" part.

http://www.crsbi.ac.uk/ed/sx/bunct/i4572.htm

http://www.crsbi.ac.uk/ed/sx/bunct/i4576.htm

unless these pics are from after the damage.

On edit: seems "female" to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. a better picture and description here
http://www.jharding.demon.co.uk/index.htm#http://www.jharding.demon.co.uk/SheelaNaGigIndex.htm

The sheela itself is situated on the left side of the chancel arch. It is quite high up and unusually it lies on it's side. (see below). A note in the church describes the carving as being that of the mason and makes no reference to it being a sheela or even female. There may be some doubt as to whether this carving is a sheela or not. There are no obvious genitals on display but there does seem to be some indication of toolwork where the genitals should be. If there were carved genitals at some time then the carving would be similar to the one at Oaksey in Wiltshire. This similarity is further borne out by the fact that stances of the figures in both carvings are very similar. The carving also has two very small breasts or nipples which are not obvious in the photograph above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. hahahaha
That tidbit caught my eye, too!

"Now Johnny, the male part is like the electrical plug at the end of the lamp cord. The female part is like the plug in the wall. In fact, that is where the terms "male" and "female" come from."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has anyone seen Ashcroft lately? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC