Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could Bernard Kerik have been a blessing in disguise?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:00 PM
Original message
Could Bernard Kerik have been a blessing in disguise?
Before Kerik withdrew his nomination to be DHS secretary, our local paper was just in love with the guy. (The fact that he was in the 82nd Airborne--a unit which can do no wrong, according to the local rag--and was married to our Clerk of Court didn't hurt.)

Now that he's pulled out, every day has carried a new revelation of some of the shit he's done. They haven't gotten to the Mafia ties, but today they admitted the Taser Inc. stock transactions. And a few days ago they even discussed his little love nest in NYC.

They also told us that the White House claims to have known about most of the things he did.

Which leads us to the obvious question: is the Kerik fiasco going to cause Congress to conduct real investigations and ask real questions of Bush's nominees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somehow I don't think so.
They WANTED a legbreaking thug. They'll just find some loyal grunt with no history to be the new head of the SS... I mean HSS, homeland security services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimpanzee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. probably not.... unfortunately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. "White House claims to have known about most of the things he did."
Edited on Mon Dec-20-04 11:10 PM by DemoTex
Indeed. Bu$h said so today in his "press briefing." Bu$h ended up by saying something to the effect of "we are vetting, we are good at vetting, and we will keep on vetting." I suggest we substitute "fucking" for "vetting." Bu$h and Rove do not know what "vetting" means (I mean -- look-it! -- Cheney "vetted" himself for Prime Minister, er .. VP). But they damn sure know what "fucking" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-20-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Could be a tipping point. I hope so.
This is so bad, it has to raise real questions. After all, this was the guy that was supposed to "protect us." HAHA. What a joke! The press is uncharacteristically inquisitive on this one. Maybe they just forgot to hook up their IV Xanax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hoi polloi Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kerik
Sometimes I think we should actively support any nominee who can ultimately besmirch and abase Bush and his dictatorship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hello hoi polloi!
Welcome to DU, and I love your screen name. I wish that I had thought of it first ;)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sara Beverley Donating Member (989 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, not even to his mother (RIP). But he may be the "straw"
But only if the press grows some spine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC