skjpm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 04:55 PM
Original message |
got my Time--am cancelling my subscription |
|
I thought I'd do it today in hope that there's a bunch of us. My Mom tore up the cover as soon as she looked at it-spoiled my plans for a dart board. You know, it doesn't help to know that Hitler and Stalin were also on the cover--they may have been evil, but they weren't incompetent. And they had to work their way to the top. Bush only got to be Antichrist because of his father's connections.
|
JimmyJazz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Also, Hitler and Stalin were vilified. This article, |
|
from what I gather, has a positive spin to it - talking about his leadership and....oh nevermind, I can't go on. I'm cancelling mine, too.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The story on Bush is a fluff piece too |
|
Even though they say that it isn't necessarily an honor to be chosen Person of the Year--the story seems highly complimentary to me.
|
goddess40
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Goddess40's mom here. I cancelled both Time and Newsweek after the election. Told them I would consider resubscribing when they quit beating the drums for *.
|
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Gave up on Time years ago. |
|
The only weekly I have a subscription to is "The New Republic". Though they seem to be entrenched with the DNC.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I'm rippng the cover off to send with my letter back to them. |
|
While I do note their justification and can't argue over Bush's* impact, the fact is that just having him on the cover ADDS to his impact. If they had any social conscience for themselves, their kids, for others, I think they would have stopped this practice of "celebrating" individuals for their impact, good or BAD. It is a copout, after all, given that their sychophantic "reporting" has enabled this SOB for the past 4+ years.
|
Midlodemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Cancelled. After throwing it in the fire. |
happynewyear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
7. How to cancel it on line |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-21-04 05:02 PM by dumtacetclamat
Not too difficult ...
www.time.com/customerservice.
Make sure you leave the . in after customerservie as the link won't work without the . at the end FYI.
:toast:
|
skjpm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I wonder how many people will do this? |
|
It looks like a bunch of us are--maybe it's a groundswell.
|
happynewyear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
It was a whole lot easier than having to be on hold waiting to tell some idiot why when, etc. etc. ad infinitum ... lol! :D
|
Bluebear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Thank you for the link, just cancelled my subscription |
|
And I get 13 bucks back to boot.
'I will consider renewing my subsciption when you stop joyously beating the Bush drumbeat. Enjoy your person of the year's second term. Why not just save us the suspense and name him person of EVERY year!'
|
MasonJar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I wish I could cancel, but I refuse to support Time in any way. Be |
|
sure to let them know exactly why!
|
burpsalot
(40 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Clinton was person of the year, too, right? n/t |
neuvocat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
maxsolomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
go ahead & take your shot, 22 posts.
|
burpsalot
(40 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
I just couldn't remember.
|
secedeeconomically
(380 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Don’t underestimate Stalin’s incompetence lol |
Serra
(9 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message |
17. We got our Time today too... |
|
My dad took out the mail, saw the cover and then almost shouted "pornography!" as he threw it in the trash...
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
if I had a sub. to Time. I think they have had a Republican slant for years though.
|
Tony_Illinois
(590 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Who Gives A Rat's Ass Anyway About This Man of the Year BS? |
|
This particular acknowledgement that Time magazine has been giving for too many years has never made any kind of sense to me anyway. I view the whole thing as just a gimmick on Time's part to jack up the sale of the magazine late in the year during "holiday" season. They at Time would like to believe that this is a weighty event that everyone anxiously awaits and it really has some "meaning". Please--let's just get over it. It means about as much as which models make it to the SI cover in the swimsuit edition.
|
Stevepol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-21-04 06:40 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Get a subscription to Harper's. They've got a good editorial on fraud |
|
in this January's new issue and several other very interesting articles. Have a feeling they might be setting the stage for more focus on the election fraud. We'll see. I might renew my subscription if that proves to be the case. I'd planned to drop it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message |