Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Atheists Drowned Out By Counter-Protesters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bones_7672 Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 08:27 AM
Original message
Atheists Drowned Out By Counter-Protesters
http://www.middletownpress.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=13589484&BRD=1645&PAG=461&dept_id=10856&rfi=6

"A few times when it looked as if would get ugly, police stepped in to calm both sides as they engaged in face-to-face debates on free speech and the separation of church and state.

The display is a wooden structure with a glass case showing a Nativity scene. At its base is a baby Jesus in a cradle. Next to the cradle is a sign: "This display is provided by the Hyatt family and not erected, maintained or sponsored by the city of Milford."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. This Reflects The Division In This Country Whipped Up By Karl Rove
His goal is being achieved - open warfare on secular America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tafiti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hehe! They sang "Jesus Loves You" as they left!
Christians crack me up sometimes. HAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Geez...Why do some Religious people feel they need to force....
...their "thing" down everybody's throat.
There's tons of Churches and thousands of homes in that town but they HAVE to put their symbols on public, taxpayer property.
I don't seem to recall Jews or Hindus or for that matter, any other religion, trying to cram their symbols on the public...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. You don't understand the nature of the thing
Think of it as a living organism. It spreads only by claiming new minds. It competes with other belief systems. The struggle is the same as evolution. That which devises the most effective method of propogation is the one that survives. There are a number of tactics that religions can use. The most succesful, unlike nature, are the more aggressive ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruffhowse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fundies, Fundies, Fundies........is there anything they won't do in the
Edited on Wed Dec-22-04 09:07 AM by Ruffhowse
name of their version of God?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Practice what they preach? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. You think it is a coincidence that three of them said the same thing
on a sign: "This is a Christian nation - majority rules."

a counter protestor: "I’m afraid of the atheists imposing their will on the super-majority."

a third: Don’t impose your absence of morality on a majority."

Yahtzee!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. super-majority as opposed to "Micro -Minority"
Edited on Wed Dec-22-04 10:51 PM by RetroLounge
a term being used by another poster here.

Must have gotten the fundy talking points from Rove.

I'm keyed up to their code words...

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. My question is
If this is erected, maintained and sponsored by the Hyatt family, why don't they put it in their own yard, rather than on public property?
I realize that the public square in this town is used by many divergent people to express differing points of view, but I am willing to wager a large sum that these other expressions are transcient in nature, speeches, protests, etc. A nativity scene is a semi-permanent fixture, built and erected in order to stay on site for a period of a view weeks. That is wrong, unless they will allow other religions, including Satanism.. to erect such semi-permanent displays. Somehow I doubt that such divergent displays would be allowed, therefore neither should this nativity scene.

I also shuddered at statements voiced by the Christian. Nora Jean Alicea's statement about not believing that there should be seperation of church and state, and the anonymous sign stating that This is a Christian nation - majority rules." is very indicative of the direction that this country is taking, a quick slide into theocracy, cheered on by the brain dead RW fundies in this country. These statements truly reveal the black souls of these so-called Christians, wishing to impose their believes, values, and morality on everyone, irregardless of the rule of law, and with force if need be. And what is truly sad is that if Christ would come down today and see what these people are doing in his name, he would smite them down quicker than you can say Christian hypocrites.

Welcome to the new America, where we are to suffer under theocratic fascism and the tyranny of the majority, complete with brain dead idiots ready to kill you if you deviate from their version of hypocritical morality on iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Well Said ! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Now they are the "Super-Majority? " LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think that they are speaking in terms of sheer numbers
Super majority is a parlimentry term, meaning that a particular coalition is more than two thirds of the total. And in that view, they are correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Understand the term, but I don't believe these Biblebots
represent 2/3 of the total.

But like all right wing nut cases, if they say it once, they believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. They even have capes to prove it!
Musta missed Edna's lecture...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Naw..not really...Intelligent, caring people have always been .....
...in the minority in this country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. You should know!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jesus H. Christ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. He sure would.
So far he's a rich jew living in Coral Gables, Fl. who supports the war and is surprised that there aren't more homeless people living in gated communities.

Not many of them around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. yeah I've got his number
I checked out the posting history after he claimed in another thread that Laura Bush has every right to remove Clinton's portrait from the White House, since it's her house she can do what she wants. :eyes: Doesn't take long for them to slip up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. A microcosm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. they were protesting a nativity scene, at Christmas?
paid for and sponsored by a private group, because it was on public property? How silly. Most Americans have no problem with nativity scenes, menorahs, and other religious displays during the holiday. Especially considering that this was paid for by private groups, I can't see any first amendment problems at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Who decides what gets displayed on the Green? How is it decided?
If I wanted to display a diorama depicting human evolution beginning with our simian ancestors and culminating in a jolly fat guy in a red suit, to be shown between Thanksgiving and New Years, would Mayor Richetelli accomodate me? I sincerely doubt that he would.

What they have in Middleton does not appear to be an absolute separation of the religious and civic spheres. You may be of the opinion that such is not required by the First Amendment, but surely you are aware that there are judicial opinions that say that it is. These opinions are based upon the writings of James Madison and Thomas Jefferson who both indicated that they intended the establishment clause to protect religious liberty by maintaining an absolute separation of religion and state. Exactly what do you find silly about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. well, the majority of Americans don't agree with you
sucks to be a minority I guess. Don't let me stop you from fighting to remove all displays of Christianity from public spaces. At the least - start a new party so you don't drag the Democrats down with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. the majority of Americans are for marriage discrimination against gays
Hell, most Americans were once for segregation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gottaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Is that the Democratic position?
To hell with minorities. To hell with civil liberties. To hell with dissent. To hell with a big tent. To hell with Thomas Jefferson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
procopia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The majority of Americans
are ignorant about the concept of separation of church and state. Some think freedom of religion means the freedom to force their religious views on everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. The majority of Americans once supported Jim Crow and lynching
Edited on Thu Dec-23-04 12:13 AM by Ms. Clio
And how do you know what "the majority of Americans" support?

What a wacky argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Porcupine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. Try privatly paying for a Ganesh on public lands.
You will get about as far as the people who are trying to get permission to protest Bush's inaugeration. These "Christians" excuses are all lame attempts to cover up their true intentions.

To force non-believers or non-practioners of THEIR BRAND of Christianity to accept its practices.

This whole propaganda war is about forcing others to have christian symbolism and practices in their lives. Next-Sunday Laws!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. don't worry, aetheists and believers. IN the end, we will all find out.
Edited on Wed Dec-22-04 10:46 PM by roguevalley
ONe by one.

God, I am so sick of religious intolerance anymore. What has happened to us? Everyone has the right to believe, or not. Period. We used to live this. Not anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissBrooks Donating Member (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Excellent!
I totally agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. What has happened is
a expansionist social structure has been allowed to continue to exist after the development of a more pacifist social order was set in place. Due to the inability of the newer system to deny the advances of the older system it is regaining ground it lost long ago.

Translated:

The age of enlightenment gave rise to a fusion of beliefs and tolerance. It allowed for diverse societies and peoples to strive together. In creating this fusion of humanism and belief religious structures and churches had their power substantially diminished. It has taken them a long time but they are reasserting their social dominance once again. Ridding their system of the tolerance of other belief systems that brought us this far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Just a cop out on the part of Milford
Stating that it is not maintained or sponsored, yet allowing it to be placed on public property, is still sanctioning the act, which is a violation of the first amendment. How about a burning cross or a Nazi flag. If they are to allow one kind of speech to be sanctioned, they should allow other forms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-04 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
30. Meanwhile, down in Weatherford, TX...
...the city council pulled dirty politics and set up a Nativity scene in front of their courthouse while simultaneously blocking American Atheists from putting up their own display.

This has been a long-running fight in Weatherford, and we thought thebattle was over, but apparently their city council has decided that the ends justify the means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC