Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush cuts global food aid, keeps presidential yacht

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nascarblue Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 04:43 PM
Original message
Bush cuts global food aid, keeps presidential yacht
Here's a kicker, cut off food to the poor, keep the yacht and rebuild the hall of fame. What a bunch of crap...
<snip>

...The cutbacks, estimated by some charities at up to $100 million, come at a time when the number of hungry in the world is rising for the first time in years and all food programs are being stretched.

As a result, Save the Children, Catholic Relief Services and other charities have suspended or eliminated programs that were intended to help the poor feed themselves through improvements in farming, education and health.

"We have between five and seven million people who have been affected by these cuts," said Lisa Kuennen, a food aid expert at Catholic Relief Services. "We had approval for all of these programs, often a year in advance. We hired staff, signed agreements with governments and with local partners, and now we have had to delay everything."


<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/22/politics/22aid.html?hp&ex=1103778000&en=715a5b3235c8ae0d&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess those are his christian moral values .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. er, we don't have a Presidential yacht
so I don't know where that came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
purduejake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, he seems to ride on aircraft carriers for fun....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. There will be one, and soon
$1 million to build it was in the $388 billion spending bill Bush signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. actually, technically it was $2million
to acquire the Sequoia, the Presidential Yacht from Wilson to Nixon, now in private hands and dowcked in SouthWest Washington.

and the President does not have a line item veto, he cannot veto one spending item without vetoing the entire federal budget.

doesn't mean that the government will actually buy Sequoia, or that the President will ever use it (talk about a security nightmare)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Our Senate voted for the yacht in November
'The Senate voted 65-30 for the legislation late on Saturday that sets aside funds for a range of priorities including a presidential yacht, foreign aid and energy. It is one of the final pieces of work for the 108th Congress and they may return to finish a spy agency overhaul before the end of the year.'

Yes, a lot of our Democratic senators voted for it, having to get home for Thanksgiving and all. Meanwhile Bush gets his yacht and families have to raise their own money for armor for their kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ip568 Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Congress...
... controls whether the government keeps the yacht, not the president. No president controls any executive branch assets. Complain to your congressman. The NYT should know better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. "The NYT should know better."
where in the NY Times article did it say or suggest what you say it said?

did it even mention the budgetary process?

The word "yacht" isn't in the article. I think you're reacting to the original poster's personal commentary, and incorrectly accuse the NYT of something that's not there.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a matter of fascistic priorities.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC