Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ukraine, Yushchenko, his wife (Bush employee), the US and Soros

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:27 PM
Original message
Ukraine, Yushchenko, his wife (Bush employee), the US and Soros
Let me caveat this by saying that the people of Ukraine have always been near and dear to my heart because of some deep, past associations of my younger years. There is nothing I wish them more than TRUE independence. True independence from the meddling of Russia and of the US who have been in am unsettling chess game ever since Bush "stared into Putin's soul". Putin's been playing the game and uttering mocking statements about how "trustworthy" Bush is. Meanwhile PNAC has issued a letter about Russia (another sudden interest on their part in democracy but note how they specify their concern is for tens of thousands of Democrats) & Russia is teaming up with China for the first ever joint military exercises. Things are not as quiet as they seem and I'll try to paste some of the oil-related, Iran-related stories too but I hope others will help because we talked about this in small threads over the last few months. Russia is NOT happy about our interference in their back yard over more than just Ukraine and for several years now.

After hearing that the NED had pumped $65 million dollars into this election and that his wife was an American citizen, I thought I'd research this a little. I don't know this handsome US-backed Yushchenko but I'm suspecting that he is going to dismantle the Ukraine Boris-Yeltsin style and sell if off to US & European corporate interests. Germany, France and the US already have their deals in place with him over pipelines, utility companies and national resources.

Just thought I'd throw this information out there so that people can see how these things are done and how the media cooperates into presenting these changes as "spontaneous" changes that the US had nothing to do with.

So here we go. First some of the "meddling" that the media hasn't covered and then in my second post, Yushchenko's "dedicated conservative" US State Department wife.

$61 million for the Ukraine elections to back Yushchenko and $100,000 to the Tsunami victims. Just shameful.
==========================================================



Bush Adminstration Spent $65 Million to Help Opposition in Ukraine

December 10, 2004

By: Matt Kelley
Associated Press

Printer Friendly Version

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration has spent more than $65 million in the past two years to aid political organizations in Ukraine, paying to bring opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko to meet U.S. leaders and helping to underwrite exit polls indicating he won last month's disputed runoff election.

(snip)

But officials acknowledge some of the money helped train groups and individuals opposed to the Russian-backed government candidate — people who now call themselves part of the Orange revolution.

For example, one group that got grants through U.S.-funded foundations is the Center for Political and Legal Reforms, whose Web site has a link to Yushchenko's home page under the heading "partners." Another project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development brought a Center for Political and Legal Reforms official to Washington last year for a three-week training session on political advocacy.

(snip)
The four foundations involved included three funded by the U.S. government: The National Endowment for Democracy, which gets its money directly from Congress; the Eurasia Foundation, which gets money from the State Department, and the Renaissance Foundation, part of a network of charities funded by billionaire George Soros that gets money from the State Department. Other countries involved included Great Britain, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

Grants from groups funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development also went to the International Center for Policy Studies, a think tank that includes Yushchenko on its supervisory board. The board also includes several current or former advisers to Kuchma, however.

IRI, Craner's Republican-backed group, used U.S. money to help Yushchenko arrange meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney , Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage and GOP leaders in Congress in February 2003.

(snip)

http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=10108&fcategory_desc=Under%20Reported

====

(snip)

the U.S. government, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), granted millions of dollars to the Poland-America-Ukraine Cooperation Initiative (PAUCI), which is administered by the U.S.-based Freedom House. (note: Very hawkish / Dan Quayle is one of their trustees / other names just as disturbing: http://www.freedomhouse.org/aboutfh/bod.htm)

PAUCI then sent U.S. government funds to numerous Ukrainian non-governmental organizations (NGOs). This would be bad enough and would in itself constitute meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign nation. But, what is worse is that many of these grantee organizations in Ukraine are blatantly in favor of presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko.

Consider the Ukrainian NGO International Center for Policy Studies. It is an organization funded by the U.S. government through PAUCI. On its Web site, we discover that this NGO was founded by George Soros' Open Society Institute. And further on we can see that Viktor Yushchenko himself sits on the advisory board!

(reluctant snip)

This May, the Virginia-based private management consultancy Development Associates, Inc., was awarded $100 million by the U.S. government "for strengthening national legislatures and other deliberative bodies worldwide." According to the organization's Web site, several million dollars from this went to Ukraine in advance of the elections.

(snip)

http://antiwar.com/paul/?articleid=4135

Note from the USAID page on Ukraine: "Beyond the power sector, USAID plans to identify and assist in removing the obstacles of proper market functioning in other segments of the energy sector such as the privatization of the oil and gas transportation systems."
http://www.usaid.gov/pubs/cbj2003/ee/ua/121-0150.html
==================

THE ELECTION crisis in Ukraine highlighted once again how much the mainstream media reads straight from the White House script.

Still breathless from cheerleading the destruction of Falluja, the media fell right in line with the administration, portraying the standoff as a Cold War-style battle between a Russian-sponsored authoritarian, Viktor Yanukovich, and the Western-backed democrat, Viktor Yushchenko.

Journalists failed to mention that the supposed Moscow puppet, Yanukovich, did Bush’s bidding last year by dispatching Ukrainian troops to Iraq. The same newspapers that ignore or deride protesters in the U.S. enthused over mass demonstrations in Kiev staged by supporters of Yushchenko.

They dutifully repeated Bush’s pronouncement that the upcoming election rerun “ought to be free from any foreign influence." Someone at the White House forgot to tell Republican Sen. John McCain, who chairs the International Republican Institute, and former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, his counterpart at the National Democratic Institute. Both outfits--which are part of the government-funded National Endowment for Democracy--were active in Ukraine supporting Yushchenko’s candidacy.

(snip)

There’s no doubt that supporters of the Russian-backed Yanukovich stole the November 21 runoff election. But for all his opposition imagery, Yushchenko is a status quo politician--which in Ukraine means being an insider with ties to superrich “oligarchs” like Yulia Tymoshenko, who became wealthy through corrupt privatization of state-owned industry following the collapse of the former USSR in 1991.

(snip)

http://www.socialistworker.org/2004-2/523/523_03_Ukraine.shtm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Again, I wish info from your post was more discussed in the news
I just found out, from your post, about his wife and her previous employers (Bush I)...makes one think and wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Your wish is coming partly true. Ron Paul asking for an investigation
Thursday, December 23, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.


Who is influencing Ukraine vote?

By Fred Weir and Howard LaFranchi

The Chrsitian Science Monitor

KIEV, Ukraine, and WASHINGTON, D.C. — The international observers began arriving in Kiev by the planeload yesterday to oversee Sunday's presidential revote. By the weekend, the number of poll watchers is expected to swell to 12,000, the largest contingent of international observers ever to monitor an election.

The degree of Western interest — and funding — directed at Ukraine's troubled democratic process over recent months has raised questions about the motives behind foreign assistance and its impact on this post-Soviet state.

U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, has alleged that $60 million in U.S. funding went overwhelmingly to finance activities that led to the "Orange Revolution," two weeks of protest that followed the disputed victory by Russian-backed Viktor Yanukovich over opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko.

The U.S. Agency for International Development, the National Endowment for Democracy and a few other foundations reportedly sponsored certain U.S. organizations, including Freedom House, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute, the Solidarity Center, the Eurasia Foundation, Internews and several others to provide small grants and technical assistance to Ukrainian civil society. The European Union, individual European countries and the Soros-funded International Renaissance Foundation did the same.

(snip)

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002128377_ukraine23.html

The Bush administration insists that the money has gone solely to nongovernmental democracy-building organizations and not to any one candidate.

But at least two congressmen, Republican Ron Paul of Texas and Democrat Edolphus Towns of New York, are calling for an investigation into how the money has been spent.

(snip)
http://www.capecodonline.com/cctimes/12monitors26.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. but I thought Soros was a good guy?
After all, he's against Bush, that make him good right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He is a good guy
...he has spent millions of his own money to try to bring democracy to the former soviet union as well as other iron curtain countries. Additionally, he is a phenomenal philanthropist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. what sort of "democracy" did he bring to the former USSR?
He's one of the people behind the Oligarchs isn't he? Sounds more like the Mafia than Democrats.

"Additionally, he is a phenomenal philanthropist."

So are the Bushs, and Bill Gates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not to the extent of Soros
...George Bush's 'philanthropy'? You are kidding right? And Gates funnels most of his money through his foundation. Soros has set up foundations in Poland, the Ukraine and several other iron curtain areas to try to assist the people of that area.


(He is a client of mine, that is how I know this):)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Please Thank George for me!
I'll email him later.:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I am going to believe that you are serious
...I think the man is wonderful for all the good works he has done, in addition to his politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Just saw the Reply. No Sarcasm here.
I tip my hat off to the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. so you are being paid by Soros?
okay - what's the business, PR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:49 PM
Original message
Shhh, it's a secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. heh, not anymore :)
Soros and his clan are the international equivalent to the DLC - I want no part of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Fie, I say to you.
...I personally love the guy. He dispenses so much of his wealth to those who deserve it...we will have to agree to disagree. Happy New Year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. If he's your client, beg him to buy us a news network
I'll watch.

I also bet he'd make a hell of a profit. Half of the country would watch, with FoxCNNMSNBCCBSABCNBC splitting the other half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I said he was my client, not my husband.
...seriously, he is very philanthropic and he has donated a lot of his money to very good causes. I wouldn't want to see him lumped in with Bush for any reason. One of his main goals in life is to try to use his money to help others. Not many can say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Buying a network would help MILLIONS of people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I know.
and I also think the idea has been broached previously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Since You Have Something to Say
just say it. No need for the Snarkiness. Is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleBallots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I just did
What does "snarky" mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. This is a key point..
The ruling elite in Russia hasn't changed much. Instead of the Communist party it's organized crime that is pulling the strings. I get sick when people bleed for the poor, oppressed Yukos crime gang.

Russia is the picture perfect image of what capitalism does when left to run amok. A small minority class of very rich is created who enjoy all the gravy and a huge pool of workers are left to struggle and fight for table scraps.

Ask my wife's family who live in Kamensk Uralsky. They'll tell you about the wonders of their new 'democratic' system (read CAPITALIST system). Ask them what happened to their access to higher education. Ask them about what has happened to their access to health care. Ask them about what has happened to their child care programs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I wish I'd saved the link there was a thread here about a year ago
a suicide letter from a young Georgian(?) kid who immolated himself in public "thanking" us for the "democracy" we'd brought them. It had me so ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
51. I'll try searching for it later Tinoire
when the advanced search is on. Any other clues to the thread it might be in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Thanks but unfortunately, I can't remember... It was about 2 yrs ago
or 1 1/2 and I'm pretty sure it was in GD. I think it was either around the time of the Georgian "revolution" or the Dyncorps Sex Trade scandals.

Don't waste your time though... The last thing I'd want to do is take you away from your own research. I'll be donating to DU again and when I get my star I'll dig it up for reference. It was a really sad thread.

Peace to you xx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yuschenko's wife, Bush & Reagan links
She spreads out dozens of family photographs. There's Victor Yushchenko holding one of his children. Kathy and Victor and their children at a birthday celebration. A picture of Moll and her sister in Ukraine. And one of the girls with their mother in Florida. There are also framed photographs of her sister with former President Ronald Reagan and another with her and former President George Bush and his wife, Barbara.
www.ajc.com/metro/content/ metro/cherokee/1204/22ukraine.html -

==================
(snip)

After receiving a bachelor's degree from Georgetown University and a master's degree in business administration from the University of Chicago, Chumachenko Yushchenko held a series of jobs in Washington. She worked as an adviser on Eastern European ethnic affairs in the Reagan White House and in the State Department's human rights office.

When the Soviet Union began to fall apart in 1991, she co-founded U.S.-Ukraine Foundation, a non-profit organization that facilitates democratic development and free market reform in the European country.

Chumachenko Yushchenko moved to Kiev just before Ukraine became independent. The daughter of immigrants always had her heart there, said Nadia McConnell, president of the Washington-based foundation. Chumachenko Yushchenko was active in an organization that helps Ukrainian orphans, and she has even tried to help the scraggly mutts she noticed in Kiev, McConnell said.

(snip)

In 1993, Chumachenko Yushchenko met Viktor Yushchenko, now 50. She was working for KPMG LLP - an international audit, tax and advisory firm - and she led a study tour that brought Ukrainian bankers to several U.S. cities, including Chicago. At the time, Viktor Yushchenko was head of the Central Bank, and he joined the trip. Unlike many Ukrainian bankers then, she said, he was well-versed in free-market economics, and he was eager to reform a system struggling to emerge from communism.

(snip)

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/120604C.shtml


NEWS AND VIEWS: The IRI delegation's observation of the presidential runoff in Ukraine ((Neocon/Neoliberal NED))

by Bohdan Watral
On November 14 the citizens of Ukraine voted in the runoff election for president. In order to verify the validity of the election process, the International Republican Institute sent a 22-member observation mission to Ukraine, comprising nine volunteers and 13 employees.
Established in 1984, the International Republican Institute is a private, non-profit organization dedicated to advancing democracy worldwide. It is not a part of the Republican Party of the United States Oh ha ha ha ; its programs are non-partisan and promote fundamental American principles such as individual liberty, the rule of law and the entrepreneurial spirit that fosters economic development.
Thanks to the sponsorship of Sen. John McCain, chairman of IRI's board of directors, I was appointed as one of international election delegates who monitored the elections. The significance of the mission lies in the fact that democratic elections in Ukraine send a positive message to the entire world that Ukraine is committed to an orderly transition to democracy.

(snip)

Upon arriving in Ukraine, IRI delegates had an opportunity to meet other each other during the evening of November 10. We spent the next day in briefings, which began with an introduction and welcome from IRI Vice-President Grace Moe and IRI CIS Program Director Judy Van Rest, as well as a presentation on the election environment given by Tom Garrett, the IRI's resident program director for Ukraine. Briefings were also held with U.S. Ambassador Steven Pifer; the manager of Barents Group, Kathy Chumachenko; and representatives of the European Community.

(snip)

This mission reinforced my belief that Ukraine continues to struggle on the difficult path to democracy and economic freedom. Working with international observers, consultants and the providers of international assistance will help Ukraine in that struggle. I am confident that Ukraine is making positive strides to become a more viable and meaningful partner of our world community.

Bohdan Watral is CEO and president of Selfreliance Ukrainian Federal Credit Union. He is well-known for his work in promoting the re-introduction of credit unions in Ukraine.
http://ukrweekly.com/Archive/1999/519923.shtml


======

(not too sure about this one but interesting nonetheless!!)

    During a House Government Reform and Oversight Committee investigation it was reported that Bill and Hillary Clinton had been gathering FBI files on people. At that time, June 10th 1996, they had only gone through the files on people who's last names began with the letters A-G and found what was reported to be close to 1000 files, and 399 of them were on officials who served during the Bush and Reagan administrations, and are listed below. Many of our critics say that this is a lie and we are conspirators trying to tarnish the good name of Bill Clinton, but they have no evidence, just opinions. I present you with the, almost 400, names of the people who served under the Reagan and Bush administrations, who's FBI files were in the possession of Bill and Hillary Clinton, as reported by USA-Today and the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee on June 10th of 1996. The investigation is still going on and this list of people tied with the Bush and Reagan administrations is now rumored to have over 700 names, but I will only share the solid factual evidence I can get my hands on. What were they used for?
    I don't have any FBI files on the Clintons or their administration,
    yet I'm supposed to be a conspirator.

    (snip/a ton of names)

    Chumachenko, Katherine Clare: Reagan, State Department special assistant

    http://home.earthlink.net/~mrnetwork/filegate.html

===

(snip)

In the late 1980s and early 1990s she worked in the human rights office of the U.S. State Department. She also worked for the first President Bush in the Treasury Department. But her dream was always to help Ukraine become independent. So after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 she moved to Kiev. Her business degree from the University of Chicago helped her land a job with KPMG, the U.S. international auditing company, and she prospered training the country's economists in Western practices. She met Viktor Yushchenko when he was part of a delegation of central bankers she brought to Chicago. "He understood free markets, had a firm faith in God and knew what the right path for the country should be," she told me.

(snip)

Now that Mr. Yushchenko is to become president, it's likely he'll be able to push through more than his wife's citizenship application. He helped implement some free-market reforms when he served as prime minister for 16 months between 1999 and 2001 before being ousted by hard-liners in Parliament. Now he has a popular mandate at his back as well as international support, which has only increased with the success of his "orange revolution." His wife has also proved invaluable by introducing him to contacts in the West.

(snip)

The challenge will be to move Ukraine towards a free-market economy. Mrs. Yushchenko makes clear that her husband makes all of his own political decisions, but she will no doubt be a valuable asset to him. "She is one of the brightest, most dedicated conservatives I have ever known," says Bruce Bartlett, a former official in the Treasury Department under the first President Bush. "Anyone who met Kathy quickly discovered that creating a free, successful Ukraine was her primary mission in life, to the exclusion of almost everything else."

Now the challenge facing Ukraine is to make the leap towards becoming a democratic society truly governed by the rule of law. Mrs. Yushchenko is realistic about the obstacles facing her husband and his team. " people are making a lot of money off the current system," she told ABC News. "The last thing they want is for the system to change and for the economy to be a free market economy where the general population benefits rather than a small group of people at the top."

(snip)

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110006076


This is becoming a little bit disturbing.

When you do a namebase on this woman you get a strange organization named Slava Stetsko that's related, in namebase, to among other things,

The American Freedom Coalition, a http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/132/36.0.html">conservative, evangelical political organization with ties to Sun Myung Moon (Also has a Coors connection)

    The American Freedom Coalition, or AFC, is a political education and lobbying group which was founded in April 1987. Calling itself a "supra-coalition," the group claimed some 300,000 members in all 50 states by February 1988. (13,37)
    The AFC represents an attempt to unite political conservatives and conservative religious groups and individuals behind a common campaign to preserve and promote what it describes as "traditional values." Among the values promoted by the AFC are a strong defense, opposition to abortion and pornography, anticommunism, religious freedom but with an emphasis on including "moral and religious standards" in government and other social institutions, the right to own property, and minimal governmental interference in the marketplace. (34,37) Its promotional literature says that the AFC acts as a "catalyst to unite a vast array of groups, activists, churches, and community organizations in cooperative and effective action. (3,37) According to AFC president Robert Grant, the AFC was formed because of the "inability of the `Christian Right' to achieve its agenda" because of its "fragmentation and its failure to build coalitions with its philosophical allies from other communities..."(13)

    (snip)

    The AFC is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization which produces educational materials on political issues; conducts workshops and seminars; promotes citizen participation in the political process; generates media coverage through well-placed speakers, articles, and Op-Ed pieces; and conducts lobbying campaigns on public policy. (3,11,37) It produces the American Freedom Journal, a monthly newspaper. Among recent contributors to the Journal have been former Reagan aide Patrick Buchanan, former Attorney General Ed Meese, the American Enterprise Institute's Ben Wattenberg, and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Jeane Kirkpatrick. (20
    The AFC frames foreign policy issues in East-West terms. In Central America, for example, it called on its backers to support "the cause to stop the spread of Soviet conquest of Central America; not appease it as many in Congress would... . If we abandon the Freedom fighters to slaughter by the communists in Central America--communists from Cuba, North Korea, East Germany and elsewhere--nothing will stop the Soviet-backed conquest of this vital area at America's very doorstep."(1) As an outgrowth of this analysis, the AFC calls for support of "freedom fighters," in countries such as Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Angola, Poland, and Estonia. (18) In terms of U.S. foreign policy, the AFC believes the United States should--in the words of Steven Trevino--"take the lead for the Free World with regards to improving the human condition."(21)
    (snip)
    At the leadership levels in both the national office and state chapters, the American Freedom Coalition is closely tied to the Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church. The Washington Post (March 30, 1988) has even described the AFC as a "Moonsponsored lobbying group."(34) The links between the two entities are so extensive that they will be discussed here in the Background section as well as in Private Connections.

    (snip)

    Among its most prominent activities recently have been its fundraising efforts on behalf of former National Security Council aide, Oliver North. One special project of the American Freedom Coalition is its "Emergency Project to Support Colonel North's Freedom Fight in Central America." The group put together a television special on North entitled "Fight for Freedom."(1) It also hoped to mobilize popular support for North's cause in order to create pressure on President Reagan to pardon North. (1,20) Between October 1987 and April 1988, the group had purchased air time in 180 television markets to air its pro-North video. During that time it also collected some 600,000 signatures supporting North. (23) In one of its petitions to President Reagan for a North pardon, the AFC argued that the former National Security Council aide was "under attack from soft-on-communism politicians in Congress. (36)

    (snip)

    http://rightweb.irc-online.org/groupwatch/afc.php



    Bush
    Coors
    Heritage Foundation

    So I keep digging….


    (fascinating read – only skimmed but plan to revisit later)

    When journalists first saw the White House fundraising
    letter dated April 14, 1982, written for Roger Pearson and signed
    by Ronald Reagan
    , it was thought to be a fluke. Since Pearson, a
    former leader of the World Anti-Communist League, was a
    world-renowned racialist with a long history of associations with
    neo-Nazi groups and individuals, a White House repudiation of the
    letter was expected when the problem was discovered. After all,
    it was the summer of 1984, and who would want Reagan connected in
    any way with an advocate of racial extermination policies before
    the November elections?

    (snip)

    After the Stetskos visited the White House, Yaroslav
    Stetsko's wife Slava Stetsko, who lives in Munich, West Germany,
    called on the ABN to support Reagan's re-election. She carried
    that message to ABN chapters during 1984 as well. The
    Reagan campaign cooperated with ABN, including scheduling an
    appearance by Michael Sotirhos, head of Ethnic Voters for
    Reagan-Bush Campaign 1984 as well as the Republican Heritage
    Groups Council, at the 1984 ABN conference in New York City.

    The goal of the ABN is to pressure the U.S. government
    toward a "liberation" policy aimed against the USSR
    , with ABN
    leaders as the liberators. Although ABN members say they only
    need technical assistance from the West, they want the U.S.
    military to put them in power in Eastern Europe and the USSR.
    This is the formula they tried under German Nazi sponsorship.
    Their manipulations of the American political system are toward
    that end.
    (snip)

    According to Henry, "a representative assembly of the most
    prominent Ukrainian leaders from all walks of life issued a
    Proclamation of the Restoration of Ukrainia's Independence. .
    ..The proclamation received enthusiastic support of the Ukrainian
    people." Henry referred to the "freedom fighters" of the
    "Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), led by Stepan
    Bandera." When questioned about his praise for a document which
    included the line "Glory to the Heroic German Army and its
    Fuhrer, Adolph Hitler," a spokesperson for Henry said he'd "not
    been aware of the fine print. . . ."


    On July 20, 1988, George Bush reaffirmed the ties between
    the Republican Party and the ABN by making a campaign stop at
    Fedorak's Ukrainian Cultural Center in Warren, Michigan. Bush
    delivered a hard-line foreign policy speech to those attending
    the annual Captive Nations banquet sponsored jointly by the
    Captive Nations Committee and the ABN. Sharing the dais with
    Fedorak and Bush was Katherine Chumachenko, formerly the director
    of the UCCA's Captive Nations Committee
    and currently the Deputy
    Director for Public Liaison at the White House. Ignatius M.
    Billinsky, President of UCCA, had already been named named
    Honorary Chair of Ukrainians for Bush, and Bohdan Fedorak named
    National vice-chair of Ukrainians for Bush.

    (snip)

    Bellant: Old Nazi Networks in US
    http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/political-science/fascism/bellant/bellant.pt3


    (snip)

    I subsequently made a number of trips into Soviet Ukraine in the 1980s to meet with the leaders of Rukh, the emerging democracy-resistance movement -- Mykhailo Horyn in Lviv and Vyacheslav Chornovil in Kiev. These meetings were arranged by a dynamic young Ukrainian-American lady in the Human Rights section of the State Department named Kathy Chumachenko.

    http://www.tothepointnews.com/weekly_report.php?i=&report=1101432338

    ==
    NOTICE OF DETERMINATION BY THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS UNDER RULE 35, PARAGRAPH 4, PERMITTING ACCEPTANCE OF A GIFT OF EDUCATIONAL TRAVEL FROM A FOREIGN ORGANIZATION (Senate - March 20, 1990)
    (Page: S2811)


    Mr. HEFLIN. Mr. President, it is required by paragraph 4 of rule 35 that I place in the Congressional Record notices of Senate employees who participate in programs, the principal objective of which is educational, sponsored by a foreign government or a foreign educational or charitable organization involving travel to a foreign country paid for by that foreign government or organization.
    The select committee has received a request for a determination under rule 35 for Kathy Chumachenko, a member of the Joint Economic Committee staff, to participate in a program in the Soviet Union, sponsored by USIA in conjunction with the Soviet Communist Youth League, from February 2-16, 1990.
    The committee has determined that participation by Ms. Chumachenko in the program in the Soviet Union, at the expense of USIA in conjunction with the Soviet Communist Youth League, is in the interest of the Senate and the United States.
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r101:S20MR0-1023:

    ===

    American officials are being very confident, they do not even try to conceal their support to agents of influence. The division of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) in Ukraine has spent more than $1.6 billion during ten years for the implementation of various democratic reforms in Ukraine. It is worth mentioning here that Ekaterina Chumachenko, Viktor Yuschenko's wife, used to chair that structure.
    http://www.pravda.us/world/20/91/368/11034_policy.html


    Even more obvious, Washington's tightest link to the Orange Revolution is exactly where Yushchenko's most vocal critics said it was - through his bright, charming, and well-connected American wife Katherine Chumachenko.

    Born in Chicago to a family of Ukrainian émigrés, Kathy - as she was then known - got her M.B.A. from the fierce free marketers at the University of Chicago, became a well-known conservative activist, and worked in the Reagan White House, where she handled contacts with American groups of Eastern European origin. She also served in the State Department, at the Treasury, and on the staff of Congress's Joint Economic Committee.

    In 1991, as the Soviet Union was breaking up, Kathy created the U.S.-Ukraine Foundation, whose announced mission was to promote Ukrainian democracy and free market reform. Kathy was the foundation's president, and then moved to Kiev as its in-country representative. As you might expect by now, U.S. funding came from NED and the Agency for International Development.

    Living in Ukraine, Kathy - now Katya - met and married Yushchenko, who was then head of the Central Bank and later Kuchma's Prime Minister. What a coup for Katya's American backers! Only Yushchenko and Kuchma fell out, and Washington had to play catch up with a classic destabilization campaign, which is how the CIA would view the Orange Revolution.
    Significantly, the first ten years of funding for Katya's U.S.-Ukraine Foundation was separate from the $65 million in U.S. spending quoted by the Associated Press. AP's figure does include money to bring Yushchenko to meet as-yet unnamed U.S. government officials.
    No doubt, both Washington and Moscow will continue to meddle in Ukraine through and beyond the new run-off election, now scheduled for December 26. What the rest of us might ask - wherever we live - is how to respond.

    http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/121604A.shtml

    Katherine Chumachenko on June 20 (1988) assumed the position of associate director of the White House Office of Public Liaison. In that capacity she is the Reagan administration's ethnic affairs liaison.
    http://www.ukrweekly.com/Archive/1988/528823.shtml

    LEGAL AND LEGAL RELATED ENTITIES IN UKRAINE (Feb 2002)

    AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION Central & East European Law Initiative (CEELI)
    ASSOCIATES IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT (ARD)/CHECCHI RULE OF LAW CONSORTIUM-KYIV
    HARVARD INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (HIID) (macroeconomic policy/legal reform)
    IFES (International Foundation For Electoral Systems)
    IRIS (International Reform and the Informal Sector)
    RULE OF LAW CONSORTIUM
    UKRAINIAN LEGAL FOUNDATION
    U.S. TREASURY TAX ADVISOR FOR UKRAINE
    BARENTS GROUP, LLC (limited liability company - lawyers)
    Katherine Chumachenko, Country Manager

    x, xxxxxxxx., Kyiv 01034, Ukraine
    Tel: xxxxx; Fax: xxxxxx
    E-mail: xxxxxxx
    (snip snip snip – an AWFUL lot of US lawyers and accounting businesses over there)

    ARNOLD & PORTER
    HAIGHT, GARDNER, POOR & HAVENS
    ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., SC (accounting & consulting services)
    DELOITTE & TOUCHE (accounting, audit and consulting service)
    ERNST & YOUNG (accounting, audit and consulting service)
    KPMG (accounting, audit and consulting service)
    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (management, audit and tax consulting)

    http://www.bisnis.doc.gov/bisnis/bisdoc/020225uklegcos.htm

    ===

    Bosnia: Sex trade claims against US companies spread 8/22/02 ( Bosnia: Sex Trade Claims Spread ) ((only related to the company but I found this interesting becauase in every ex Soviet Country the US has gone, prostitution & white slaery have flourished))
    Another western organisation in Bosnia is hit by allegations that its workers were using prostitutes
    By Julie Poucher Harbin in Sarajevo (BCR No 360, 21-Aug-02)

    A Bosnian driver has alleged that he was sacked from a US-backed development project in Sarajevo after expressing discomfort at ferrying around prostitutes.

    Edin Zundo has filed suit against KPMG Consulting over the termination of his contract six months early by its Barents Group division, claiming it was a result of his complaints.

    The action, which is due in court next month, comes in the wake of other recent cases involving western companies operating in Bosnia and Herzegovina facing accusations against staff using prostitutes, as well as a major controversy over the UN's alleged involvement in the Balkan sex trade.

    (snip)

    The Virginia-based Barents works as a contractor for the US Agency for International Development, USAID, managing major programmes to help regulate and supervise Bosnia's post-war banking system.
    (snip)
    http://www.iwpr.net/index.pl?archive/bcr2/bcr2_20020821_1_eng.txt

    http://216.239.63.104/search?q=cache:hf0Z21EGtogJ:www.afrocubaweb.com/news/worldnews50.htm+%22BARENTS+GROUP%22+rumsfeld&hl=en


    And of course, our little friend Soros is right smack in the middle of this. Last night I read that he invested $100,000 in this election but have yet to find a good source that specifies more than generic "millions".

    This is stinking really badly.



    CASE Ukraine has a substantial research background. Since 1995 our experts have worked in a number of joint projects with Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID), the Soros International Economic Advisory Group (SIEAG), the Barents Group and other.

      Areas of Concentration
      · Macroeconomic policy:
      tax reform, financial sector reform, fiscal imbalance measurement, demonetization, exchange rate policy and financial crises. A large part of our work is designated to the challenges that transition countries face in the sphere of institutional development: virtual economy, barter, arrears, property rights protection, non-monetary transactions and other.
      ·
      · Enterprise restructuring and development:
      study of effects of privatization on enterprise performance; conduct of enterprise surveys; studies on economic growth, competitiveness assessment, foreign direct investment, bankruptcy procedures, and taxation.
      ·
      · Banking sector:
      complex analyses of banking system functioning: the role of banks in enterprise crediting and growth of the economy, central bank's policies in the sphere of bank regulation and supervision.
      ·
      · Trade policy:
      studies on the issues of foreign trade policies in the context of WTO accession.
      ·
      · Social policy:
      conduct of household survey in 1999 and 2000 to get a reliable information on living standards in Ukraine; analysis of informal labor market in the frames of development of the National program to combat poverty.
      ·
      · Public sector reform:
      strengthening the reform capacity. Our team assisted in many reform efforts in Ukraine, especially in developing the government programs: Pynzenyk comprehensive reform package “Economic Growth-1997” and the Yushchenko government's program “Reforms for Welfare” in spring 2000. The former included reforms in such areas as fiscal policy, deregulation, social policy, monetary policy and financial regulation, enterprise restructuring and privatization, external relations. “Reforms for Welfare” program is notable for its market reforms orientation: leveling of “rules of game”, provision of transparency, introduction of effective bankruptcy procedures etc.
      http://www.case-ukraine.kiev.ua/aboutUs.html

    Well, it just goes on… 153 results for "Barents Group" + Soros
    =====

    Пам’ятали й у Державному департаменті США і в червні 2000 р., коли Держдеп спільно з U. S. & Foreign commercial service у своєму аналітичному огляді «International market insight: The overview of privatization in Ukraine» рекомендував Katherine Chumachenko, регіонального директора (Country Manager) фірми Barents group, LLC (limited liability company – lawyers), як консультанта з «питань приватизації в Україні».

    http://www.fin.org.ua/newws.php?i=271351

    And last but not least from my late night search: NNOHLI's DU thread is already making the rounds :toast:
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1061545&mesg_id=1061545&listing_type=#1062370
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. Interesting - but what you are suggesting due to you selective research
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 10:14 PM by TankLV
is not what I've come up with from reading the Ukrainian newspapers and talking to my relatives.

I admire your research, but if i wanted to, I could probably find more linke to prove anything I want. I don't really have a desire nor the time time to do so.

And I am an AMERICAN - and this is just all a curiosity.

But if you would spend just a day hanging around just one Ukrainain family, your conclusions would be different.

All the members of our church, as well as all other Ukrainain churches in the US and Canada would vociferiously disagree with your attempted conclusions.

It was very eye opening to me when I went home for a visit during my uncle's funeral a year ago November.

I don't like for onc split second the fact that bunkerboy could be "on the same side" and it is only prudent to suspect any and all thihngs even remotely connected to this gang of criminals.

Interesting research - would make a great bond movie, too.

Time will tell - and then we all will see the truth revealed.

All anyone can hope for is that the outcome is good for all the Ukrainian people, who certainly have suffered long enough under the domination of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Hi Tank
Thanks for your open mind. I've been speaking about this to my Ukrainian friends and their reaction is mixed... Most are ecstatic but they're also very cautious about the US backing.

I don't have a dog in this fight other than

- a total dislike of the NED's meddling in other countries' politics
- a real affection for the Ukrainian people, especially an old man no one here has ever heard of, Aleksi Alekseevich Sukhobek, who was my mentor way back when.

I'll be keeping a close eye on this right along with you. Ukraine is an extremely rich country that's always attracted the lust of its neighbors. It should, if left alone, be one of the richest ones in the world. I don't want to see its riches siphoned off.

I'll be looking for your posts on this in the future because I know that no matter how happy you are right now, you'll be the first one to scream bloody murder if there's anything suspect going on that's not in the best interest of the Ukrainian people.

Vs'ovo najkrashchovo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
59. American Freedom Coalition on database put together by ex-Moonies.
http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb04/RJ

You mentioned it, but here is a list from the site.

And a link from there to the AFC
http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb01?AMERICAN_FREEDOM_COALITION

I still reading on this thread, as I have been very confused as to the role we played in the Ukraine and why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. British Helsinki Human Rights Group: Who is Viktor Yushchenko?
With thanks to Reorg

A View from the Other Side (something we won't hear on CNN)

Date: 11 December 2004

(snip)

A First Generation Oligarch

(snip)

As the USSR was disintegrating, the Ukrainian SSR division of the Soviet Gosbank dropped – in its entirety – into the hands of the Ukrainian SSR banking sector chiefs, who formed the Joint-Stock Commercial Agro-Industrial Bank “Ukraina” (Bank Ukraina) with an extensive nationwide network of branches, a complacent clientele of collective and state farms, and billions of rubles in state funds. In 1990, one share of Bank Ukraina was worth roughly $17,000, and Soviet state credits continued to pour into Bank Ukraina as the government allocated multi-million-ruble subsidies to the agricultural sector. Viktor Yushchenko was deputy chairman of the board of Bank Ukraina, and was one of the individuals who is alleged to have embezzled huge revenues at a time when legislative oversight of banking activities was practically non-existent.

(snip)

Bank Ukraina was the incubator for a “front line” of banking cadres, playing a role comparable to that of the Central Committee of the Ukrainian Communist Youth Union (Komsomol) in supplying new members to the Ukrainian SSR Communist Party. The top names at the time were Vadim Hetman, Viktor Yushchenko, Igor Mitiukov, Viktor Kravets and Alexander Veselovsky. Most of these figures met tragic fates. Hetman was murdered, Veselovsky died in a strange auto accident and Kravets went to prison on charges of malfeasance at Bank Ukraina (as did another colleague of Yushchenko’s, Vladimir Bondar). Yushchenko magically went on – unscathed – to the next phase of his career. His long-time partner at Bank Ukraina, Igor Mitiukov, went on to become Ambassador to Great Britain, a post he still holds today.


Before and after Ukrainian independence, Yushchenko was de facto benefactor at Bank Ukraina for a number of shady organisations springing up, including an association called “Impex 55 Crimea” (Impex). From 1989-92, Impex received hundreds of millions of rubles from Bank Ukraina in a series of illicit payments – 510 million rubles in non-interest loans to one entity under the Impex umbrella and another 300 million or so to others at an annual interest rate of 1-8%. Although the charter of Bank Ukraina specified a maximum of 5 million rubles at 25-30% interest for such loans, Impex and its structures received much larger sums under very profitable conditions. The facilitator of these transactions was Viktor Yushchenko. Almost none of the credits were ever returned to the bank, but were converted into hard currency and went into the pockets of the participants.

(snip)

It should be noted that all this was happening at a time of extreme hardship for ordinary Ukrainians. Financial whiz-kid Viktor Yushchenko and his accomplices in the banking sector’s commanding heights were creaming millions off unsupervised transactions while Ukraine experienced hyper-inflation and its currency changed three times (from ruble to kupon to karbovanets to grivna). Furthermore, the ultimate collapse of Bank Ukraine became one of the most tragic scandals in post-Soviet Ukrainian history, and caused millions of ordinary citizens to lose their savings.

(snip)

A Candidate for the New World Order



What is obvious is that the West’s preference for Yushchenko stems not from his democratic credentials or his championing of the rights Ukrainians, but precisely the opposite: from his contribution to increasing the cost of living in Ukraine. Prime Minister Yushchenko succeeded in selling off several regional electricity distribution enterprises (oblenergos) in western Ukraine to foreigners, including to the American company AES. Those familiar with AES’s history in the ex-Soviet republic of Georgia will know that the privatization had disastrous results for the electricity sector there, and left many Georgians in the dark and cold in winter. This sort of change – privatization, scarcity, increased prices – is why Yushchenko’s candidacy is really valued in the West, not for democracy, “civil society,” or any of the other slogans the West trumpets. Apparently, despite Yushchenko’s support among the “enlightened” urbanites of Kiev who long to be “cool” and “Western,” and despite the control that pro-Yushchenko supporters have been able to exercise over the electoral process and machinery in Kiev and much of western Ukraine, a majority of Ukrainian voters in the 2004 election nevertheless remembered Yushchenko’s true legacy, and chose not to return to it.

(snip)

http://www.bhhrg.org/LatestNews.asp?ArticleID=53
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Viktor Yushchenko: Not Quite Ready for Sainthood (Chad Nagle)
Viktor Yushchenko
Not Quite Ready for Sainthood
By CHAD NAGLE

Kiev, Ukraine.

(snip)

Viktor Yushchenko began his career in the banking structures of the USSR, as an official of the Ukrainian division of the giant centralized Soviet planning apparatus known as "Gosbank." In the final years of the Soviet Union's existence, the disintegration of Gosbank spawned many scams and crooked schemes. Under the guise of allocating credits for state-approved projects, the emerging "entrepreneurs" embezzled the equivalent of billions of dollars worth of state resources. Corruption proliferated under a collapsing regime where legislative oversight of banking activity was practically non-existent. Almost overnight, a new breed of financial "oligarchs" was born. Mr. Yushchenko likes to brand others as "oligarchs," but few people personify the concept better than he does.

(snip)

In 1992, as deputy chairman of Bank Ukraina, Yushchenko was the de facto benefactor of a pro-Russian political movement in Ukraine's southern region of Crimea. From 1992-93, the demagogic leader of this movement, Yuri Meshkov, claimed to be standing up for the rights of Russians threatened by nationalism in the newly-independent Ukraine. Meshkov dangerously provoked conflict between Russia and Ukraine in a highly militarized area that served as the headquarters of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet. Would a genuine Ukrainian "national patriot," as Yushchenko is alleged to be, fund a political figure like Meshkov?

All this was happening at a time of serious hardship for ordinary Ukrainians. Hyper-inflation began soon after the breakup of the USSR, and Ukraine's currency changed three times. The eventual collapse of Bank Ukraina was one of the most tragic episodes in post-Soviet Ukrainian history, as millions of ordinary Ukrainians lost their life savings.

Viktor Yushchenko was one of the people who profited from the chaos and social breakdown accompanying the Soviet Union's disintegration. But his opportunism in those days doesn't make him a statesman today.

Chad Nagle is an American lawyer who was accredited as an international observer for the 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections.

http://www.counterpunch.com/nagle12222004.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Thanks for posting these links
I'm beginning to think that this is not the victory for democracy for which we were hoping.

I think it was more a question of who's lapdog won: Putin's or Bush's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. That's what I think
A choice between a US-backed thug or a Russian-backed thug.

People celebrated democracy when Yel'tsin took over the reins in Russia and yet all he did was systematically dismantle his country. Sold it to the West for a few barrels of whiskey.

I don't wish that on the Ukrainian people.

If we start reading all these stories about how US businesses are "flourishing" in Russia we'll basically know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. is there a difference?
Face it, WW3 is coming, and WE are the "germans"

:ry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. wow
what a tangled web. Thanks much for this post.

Once again, this reminds of why I simply hate politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. The media coverage of this was indeed shameful...
Edited on Mon Dec-27-04 04:50 PM by Darranar
The New York Times's lead article on this matter claimed "widespread abuses of state power" in its first paragraph, not quite an objective statement.

Seems to be a contest between a US puppet and a Russian puppet, with the Ukrainian people in trouble either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. The NYT lol, Remember their premature congratulation to the people of
Venezuela as the coup was going on?

Just read the article. Not very objective
Mr. Yanukovich (snip) was backed by many of the oligarchs Mr. Yushchenko has said he hopes to rein in

From what I read the reverse is true. What's the name of the Ukrainian oligarch at Yushchenko's side against whom all charges were recently, very mysteriously dropped? ... Justr found it, Timoshenko aka the "gas princess"?

“Julia Timoshenko kept a total of twenty-two bodyguards on her payroll, all former Spetznaz commandos, graduates of the Red Army’s most elite killing academy.”

“The file on her was maddeningly thin, consisting of a few rumpled Ukrainian press clippings of dubious veracity and a number, underlined twice and adorned with large question marks. The number was $11,000,000,000, the gross revenue of Timoshenko’s virtually unknown Ukrainian company. … Not even Coca-Cola earned that much from its combined international sales.”

(snip)

“Along the way, she struck up an alliance with Dnepropetrovsk’s regional governor, a wily former collective-farm boss by the name of Pavlo Lazarenko. (This was the very same Lazarenko who would end up in a San Francisco jail, charged with large-scale money laundering and receiving seventy-two million dollars directly from Timoshenko ….” “Lazarenko granted Timoshenko the provincial energy concession, making her de facto boss of hundreds of state enterprises, which functioned or shut down operations at her whim.”

“Timoshenko’s big break, however, came on the day of my mugging, when Lazarenko was appointed prime minister of Ukraine. One of his first moves in office was to wrest half a dozen lucrative energy concessions from several big private groups and give Timoshenko a nationawide monopoly on the import and distribution of Russian natural gas. “

“Thus UESU was born, and Timoshenko gained control over nearly 20 percent of Ukraine’s gross national product, an enviable position that probably no other private company in the world could boast.”

From ‘Casino Moscow’ by Matthew Brzezinski
The Free Press
Chapter 6 – Pg. 119-144 “The Eleven-Billion-Dollar-Woman”

http://www.brama.com/survey/messages/24189.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yet the yearning for a hero clouds the perception
funny (not) how these posts drop out of sight so fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. More amazing work Tinoire*** Thank you.
What would our world be like if our media actually told us the truth?

In the meantime, we're grateful for your wonderful research and efforts to keep DUers informed.

I will send this on to friends as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. My pleasure
:) I think it's interesting to know what they're not telling us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. You will be putting all this info in Demopedia, right?
This would be an excellent addition.

I don't have time to read everything you've posted so far, but I think it's very important, and I'd like to read it later. I'd hate to see it slip into the archives.

Thank you, Tinoire, for going to all this effort. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yes ok. Good idea. Will figure out how to do so :) Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
34. Representative Edolphus Towns (D-NY) requesting an investigation
Rising concerns over an estimated $65 million in U.S. taxpayer money used to influence the outcome of the Ukrainian presidential election, despite denial from the White House, have prompted United States Representative Edolphus Towns (D-NY) to request an investigation. Specifically, evidence is mounting that U.S. official funds were funneled to the support of organizations with a known preference for candidate Viktor Yushchenko, and that these organizations were key elements in mobilizing Ukraine's "orange revolution" that sprung up election eve with tents, equipment and huge plasma screens "spontaneously."

"Information in the public domain indicates that a significant portion of the reportedly $65 million spent during the past two years, for such programs in Ukraine, may have been given to organizations with a known partisan agenda in support of one of the presidential candidates," wrote Representative Towns, Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management, in a Dec. 14, 2004 letter to Andrew Natsios, Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), believed to be the agency responsible for most of the funding for pro-Yushchenko forces. "Such a bias would be inconsistent with public claims by the Administration that the United States is impartial in the Ukrainian election, and this would contribute to a negative image of the United States for unwarranted interference in that country's domestic affairs."

In his letter to Administrator Natsios, Representative Towns asks for 1) the total amount of funds provided by USAID to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005 to support ostensible "democracy" and "civil society" programs in Ukraine; 2) the names of organizations receiving these funds and the amounts received by each; 3) the programs for which the funds were intended for use and how they actually were used; and 4) an accounting of how much of the funds were used to support or oppose a particular Ukrainian political party or candidate.

Representative Towns notes, as an example, that USAID funds the Poland-America-Ukraine Cooperation Initiative (PAUCI), which in turn distributed sub-grants to numerous NGOs that clearly display their partisan support for Viktor Yushchenko on their Web sites -- and which some have sought to conceal when such funding became a matter for official scrutiny. Numerous other PAUCI sub-grantees are also believed to have such an agenda but do so covertly.

Representative Towns specifically asked about the "questionable expenditure" of U.S. taxpayer funds by USAID to fund an organization with a known pro-Yushchenko agenda, the US-Ukraine Foundation (USUF). USUF, co- founded by Viktor Yushchenko's wife Kateryna Chumacheko (who also served on USUF's board in the past), co-sponsored several election observation missions to Ukraine in 2004 with the Association of Former Members of Congress.

(snip)


http://zadonbass.org/en/news/message.html?id=8057
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
37. The hidden hand in the Ukraine / By William Blum
The hidden hand in the Ukraine
By William Blum | Special to the Vermont Guardian

It should come as no surprise at all that the Bush administration has spent more than $65 million in the past two years to aid political organizations in Ukraine, to train groups and individuals opposed to the Russian-backed government candidate, to bring opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko to meet US leaders, and to help generate an exit poll indicating that he won the Nov. 21 disputed election (thus seizing the initiative in the propaganda battle with the regime).

All the usual suspects were involved: the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the Agency for International Development (AID), George Soros, Freedom House, et al.

Since the demise of the Soviet Union, the United States has undertaken a relentless campaign to bring Moscow’s former republics and satellites into the fold of globalization and U.S. military outposts, and in some cases to be part of highly-prized oil pipelines. In the early 1990s, the governments of Bulgaria and Albania were overthrown for not appearing to be suitable enough candidates for such honors. In 1999, Yugoslavia was bombed for much the same reasons. Elsewhere in Eastern Europe, Washington has used the weapons of political and economic subversion.

The standard operating procedure in a particular country has been to send in teams of specialists from U.S. government agencies, non-governmental organizations, labor unions, or private organizations funded by U.S. corporations and foundations. These teams go in with as much financial resources as needed and numerous carrots and sticks to wield; they hold conferences and seminars, hand out tons of material, and fund new NGOs, newspapers, and other media, all to educate government employees and other selected portions of the population on the advantages and joys of privatizing and deregulating the economy, teaching them how to run a capitalist society, how to remake the country so that it’s appealing to foreign investors, how to fall happily into the embrace of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

(snip)

http://www.vermontguardian.com/global/0904/Ukraine1224.shtml

William Blum is the author of Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II and Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
38. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
39. Gaining control of Russian oil - John Laughland
Gaining control of Russian oil

John Laughland

11th October 2004


(snip)

This imperative of getting the oil price down, and of establishing control over the sources and transport of hydrocarbons, and has become all the more urgent as the situation in Iraq deteriorates. Oddly enough, it was Mikhaïl Khodorkovsky, the now-imprisoned Russian oil billionaire, who first drew my attention to the true American war aims in Iraq, when Chris Sanders and I met him in September 2002. Khodorkovksy feared that if the US gained control of the Iraqi oilfields, it would pump out so much oil that the price would fall to $12 a barrel. This, he told me, would destroy the Russian oil industry and Russia herself. His worst fears have gone unfulfilled for one simple reason: the unexpected tenacity of the Iraqi resistance.

This is why US strategists are now looking to make up for the mistakes they have so spectacularly made in Iraq. It is this, and not any real change in the internal political situation in Russia, which explains the West’s turn against Putin: the West needs to gain control of Russian oil. The West’s failure in Iraq is as striking as its success in Eastern Europe. The former communist states of Europe have now been comprehensively colonised by the US and its European allies. The political penetration of them is now total, as became clear in February 2003, when the US was able to call on heads of state and government in every single East European member of the EU and NATO to produce an open letter supporting the impending Anglo-American attack on Iraq, at a time when the whole of the rest of the world was lining up against it. Even (perhaps particularly) the Bosnian Serbs, whose terrifying ‘nationalism’ – according to the New World Order fairy-tale version of events – is supposed to have set the Balkans alight in the 1990s, have shown no desire whatever to get rid of the American military bases implanted in their midst since then. The fact that the height of Slavic resistance to the command “Jump!” is to ask for permission to smoke another cigarette first was undoubtedly the reason why American strategists were notoriously convinced that colonising Iraq would be ‘a cakewalk’. Russia also presents the advantage of being the second or third largest producer of oil in the world (after Saudi Arabia and perhaps Iraq) and having the world’s biggest reserves.



Efforts are being redoubled to crank into action the various pipelines which are supposed to transport Caspian oil to Western markets. One of these is the Brody pipeline which runs between the Ukrainian town of that name and the Black Sea port of Odessa (a Russian city but also in Ukraine). The Brody pipeline was initially supposed to take US-controlled Caspian oil to Western markets, but it has instead been pumping Russia oil, something the Americans do not like. "So the New World Order strategists are determined to put their man in control of Ukraine, at the presidential election on 31st October. Huge influence, and presumably money, is being pumped in to ensure a victory for Victor Yushchenko. Paul Wolfowitz said in Warsaw on 5th October that Ukraine should join NATO. Mark Brzezinski and Richard Holbrooke have rattled their sabers over Ukraine, and Anders Aslund, the architect of Yelstin's mass larceny, has eloquently outlined the West's strategic interest in that country.[br />
These national strategic interests are, as ever, supported by the private interests of the powerful people lobbying for this new anti-Putin policy. They include people like David Owen and Jacob Rothschild: the former is Yukos' representative in Britain, the latter put up much of Khodorkovsky's original money, and sits (together with Henry Kissinger) on the board of the Open Russia Foundation, a Yukos front. They also include Anders Aslund, one of the signatories of the AEI's Open Letter, who works for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which is funded by Yukos, Conoco Phillips – the strategic ally of Chevron, on whose board Condoleezza Rice sat for many years – has recently announced a "strategic alliance" with Lukoil, the second largest private oil company in the world, and Conoco Phillips is said to want a controlling stake in the Russian company. Before Khodorkovsky's arrest, indeed, it was said that he wanted to sell Yukos to an American company.

Cheap oil is a matter of life and death for the US, and it is a matter of considerable personal importance to many powerful people. The maintenance of a US-dominated unipolar world, especially in monetary affairs, is also an absolute imperative. Anything which stands in the way of these imperatives must be crushed – and Russia stands in the way of both.

http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/ShowNewsGen.aspx?NewsID=743#_edn4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
40.  PNAC's letter re Russian - Sept 2004
This is the AEI/PNAC's letter re Russia referenced in post 39.

Russia, btw, has just scheduled the first ever joint military exercises with China.

====================================

An Open Letter to the Heads of State and Government
Of the European Union and NATO

September 28, 2004

As citizens of the Euro-Atlantic community of democracies, we wish to express our sympathy and solidarity with the people of the Russian Federation in their struggle against terrorism. The mass murderers who seized School No. 1 in Beslan committed a heinous act of terrorism for which there can be no rationale or excuse. While other mass murderers have killed children and unarmed civilians, the calculated targeting of so many innocent children at school is an unprecedented act of barbarism that violates the values and norms of our community and which all civilized nations must condemn.

At the same time, we are deeply concerned that these tragic events are being used to further undermine democracy in Russia. Russia's democratic institutions have always been weak and fragile. Since becoming President in January 2000, Vladimir Putin has made them even weaker. He has systematically undercut the freedom and independence of the press, destroyed the checks and balances in the Russian federal system, arbitrarily imprisoned both real and imagined political rivals, removed legitimate candidates from electoral ballots, harassed and arrested NGO leaders, and weakened Russia's political parties. In the wake of the horrific crime in Beslan, President Putin has announced plans to further centralize power and to push through measures that will take Russia a step closer to authoritarian regime.

We are also worried about the deteriorating conduct of Russia in its foreign relations. President Putin's foreign policy is increasingly marked by a threatening attitude towards Russia's neighbors and Europe's energy security, the return of rhetoric of militarism and empire, and by a refusal to comply with Russia's international treaty obligations. In all aspects of Russian political life, the instruments of state power appear to be being rebuilt and the dominance of the security services to grow. We believe that this conduct cannot be accepted as the foundation of a true partnership between Russia and the democracies of NATO and the European Union.

These moves are only the latest evidence that the present Russian leadership is breaking away from the core democratic values of the Euro-Atlantic community. All too often in the past, the West has remained silent and restrained its criticism in the belief that President Putin's steps in the wrong direction were temporary and the hope that Russia would soon return to a democratic and pro-Western path. Western leaders continue to embrace President Putin in the face of growing evidence that the country is moving in the wrong direction and that his strategy for fighting terrorism is producing less and less freedom. We firmly believe dictatorship will not and cannot be the answer to Russia's problems and the very real threats it faces.

The leaders of the West must recognize that our current strategy towards Russia is failing. Our policies have failed to contribute to the democratic Russia we wished for and the people of this great country deserve after all the suffering they have endured. It is time for us to rethink how and to what extent we engage with Putin's Russia and to put ourselves unambiguously on the side of democratic forces in Russia. At this critical time in history when the West is pushing for democratic change around the world, including in the broader Middle East, it is imperative that we do not look the other way in assessing Moscow's behaviour or create a double standard for democracy in the countries which lie to Europe's East. We must speak the truth about what is happening in Russia. We owe it to the victims of Beslan and the tens of thousands of Russian democrats who are still fighting to preserve democracy and human freedom in their country.




Urban Ahlin Madeleine K. Albright Giuliano Amato

Uzi Arad Timothy Garton Ash Anders Aslund

Ronald D. Asmus Rafael L. Bardaji Wladyslaw Bartoszewski

Arnold Beichman Jeff Bergner Joseph R. Biden

Carl Bildt Max Boot Ellen Bork

Pascal Bruckner Mark Brzezinski Reinhard Buetikofer

Janusz Bugajski Michael Butler Martin Butora

Daniele Capezzone Per Carlsen Gunilla Carlsson

Ivo Daalder Massimo D'Alema Pavol Demes

Larry Diamond Peter Dimitrov Thomas Donnelly

Nicholas Eberstadt Uffe Elleman-Jensen Helga Flores Trejo

Francis Fukuyama Jeffrey Gedmin Bronislaw Geremek

Carl Gershmann Marc Ginsberg Andre Glucksmann

Phil Gordon Karl-Theodor von und zu Guttenberg

Istvan Gyarmati Pierre Hassner Vaclav Havel

Richard C. Holbrooke Toomas Ilves Bruce Jackson

Donald Kagan Robert Kagan Craig Kennedy

Penn Kemble Glenys Kinnock Bernard Kouchner

Jerzy Kozminski Ivan Krastev William Kristol

Girts Valdis Kristovskis Ludger Kuehnhardt Mart Laar

Vytautas Landsbergis Stephen Larrabee

Mark Leonard Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger

Tod Lindberg Tom Malinowski

Will Marshall Margarita Mathiopoulos

Clifford May John McCain Michael McFaul

Matteo Mecacci Mark Medish Thomas O. Melia

Sarah E. Mendelson Michael Mertes Ilir Meta

Adam Michnik Richard Morningstar Joshua Muravchik

Klaus Naumann Dietmar Nietan James O'Brien

Janusz Onyszkiewicz Cem Ozdemir Can Paker

Mark Palmer Martin Peretz Friedbert Pflueger

Danielle Pletka Florentino Portero Samantha Ravich

Janusz Reiter Alex Rondos Jim Rosapepe

Jacques Rupnik Eberhard Sandschneider

Randy Scheunemann Christian Schmidt

Gary Schmitt Simon Serfaty Stephen Sestanovich

Radek Sikorski Stefano Silvestri Martin Simecka

Gary Smith Abraham Sofaer James Steinberg

Gary Titley Ivan Vejvoda Sasha Vondra

Celeste Wallander Ruth Wedgood Richard Weitz

Kenneth Weinstein Jennifer Windsor R. James Woolsey


http://www.newamericancentury.org/russia-20040928.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
41. Tinoire, you are making me paranoid
and I consider that a good thing

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Lol - well here's make you more paranoid ;) Joint exercises with China
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 02:29 AM by Tinoire
:hi:
Certainly not meaning to do that! Just haven't been liking the rhetoric coming out of Washington re Russia lately and not liking Russia linking up with China for their http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2846711#2846859">first ever military exercises. I mean, in case no one's told Bush, and all those cold war hawks around him, our army's kind of tired out right now.

Maybe we should relax? I mean after all, Bush did gaze into Putin's soul and Putin cooed last month that he still "trusts" Bush.

Why do I trust neither one of them? Must be Leftist paranoia ;)

Peace my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. it's been hard to even KEEP UP with Russia
with all that is going on here

kudos to those who can keep up! :yourock:

relaxing is NOT an option... but surely Putin's "soul" sheds some light, no? :P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Thanks... Just following the oil trail lol
and noticing how the tempo between the US & Russia keeps rising. Take care. These guys are going to keep us on our toes for the next few years! Probably better to chill with the kitty :)

Veshnyakov: No Russian Revolution

As politicians cheered or jeered the apparent victory of Ukrainian presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko on Monday, Central Elections Commission chief Alexander Veshnyakov vowed that an Orange Revolution would never happen in Russia and President Vladimir Putin, who had once strongly supported Yushchenko's opponent, remained conspicuously silent.

(snip)

Following Putin's line of accusing the West of meddling in the elections and speculation that Ukraine might be included in NATO, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Monday urged the United States to be more open about its military presence near Russian borders.

After praising Moscow and Washington's cooperation on countering terrorism, Lavrov said Russia "needs clarity in our relations with the Americans because our country's security depends on it," Itar-Tass reported.


(snip)

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2004/12/28/003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
42. PNAC / Remarks on the Conference 'Ukraine's Choice'
Remarks on the Conference 'Ukraine's Choice'



Remarks on the Conference 'Ukraine's Choice'
— By Krystyna Litton

On Friday, December 10th, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) held a confernce entitled "Ukraine's Choice". The conference attempted to assess Ukraine's geopolitical orientation, civil society, and economy after the presidential elections.

The AEI is one of the largest public policy think tanks in Washington, DC. The conference was also sponsored by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation, Freedom House, the International Republican Institute, the National Endowment for Democracy, and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

Among speakers were well know politicians and researchers such as Zbigniew Brzezinski, Radek Sikorski, Vyacheslav Briukhovetsky, the chief of staff for Viktor Yushchenko Oleh Rybachuk, Adrian Karatnycky of Freedom House, and others.

(snip)

Are Events in Ukraine Capable of Influencing Neighboring Russia, Belarus, and Moldova? What is the Nature of This Influence?

As Samuel P. Huntington once urged, the democratic transition in one country could launch similar transitions in other countries of the region. The majority of speakers at the conference, including Professor Vyacheslav Bryukhovetskyi from Kyiv Mohyla Academy and Adrian Karatnycky from Freedom House, agreed that Ukraine will become such a catalyst for the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Only on how soon the changes would come did opinions differ. In his speech, Dr. Brzezinski was confident that the Ukrainian "Orange Revolution" would boost Russian opposition and lead to democratic revolution in Russia. If not for being such an experienced real-politics player he would be accused of being too naive and idealistic. But Dr. Brzezinski seems to be right. Indeed, the presence of representatives from Russian, Belarusian, and Moldovan opposition forces at the conference was quite noticeable. Their speeches and comments were nurturing a hope for democratic changes in their countries. Vladimir Kara-Murza, co-founder of the "Free Choice 2008 Committee of Russia" declared: "Freedom will come to Russia; maybe not next year, but we are hoping for 2008 (the year of presidential elections in Russia)." Someone from the audience noted that "the parliaments of Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, and Belarus were closely watching current events in Ukraine." James Sherr from the UK Defense Academy, added: "It shows them the possibilities of what could be accomplished."

(snip)

http://www.brama.com/news/press/2004/12/041227aei_ukraineconferenceremarks.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Thanks Tinoire
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Thanks for reading it... lots of links popping up re Cheney & Ukraine
now. Thanks for reading this. I hope more are otherwise it's a wasted effort ;)

Peace and thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. The sun shines for everybody, Tinoire.

THE SUN SHINES FOR EVERYBODY
Olga Grichanok

http://www.chl.kiev.ua/ENG/kids_e.htm

A tiny gift of thanks for this thread

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Thanks! That's beautiful... Absolutely beautiful
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 07:07 PM by Tinoire
And very kind of you to boot :)

I love Slavic art...

Are those camels or horses in the lower right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. Cheney Vows To Stem Reverse Flow Of Odessa-Brody (Aug 2003)
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 05:27 PM by Tinoire
CHENEY VOWS TO STEM REVERSE FLOW OF ODESSA-BRODY

www.PRAVDA.com.ua , 8.10.2003, 14:43

The American government is going to help Ukraine in the realization of the intended direction of flow of oil in the pipeline Odessa-Brody, Vice President Dick Cheney's says.

(snip)

In the words of Yelchenko, vice-president of USA raised the use of the Odessa-Brody pipeline.

"Cheney wanted to know the exact plans of the Ukrainian government concerning direct or the reverse use of the oil pipeline," Yelchenko said.

In the opinion of Cheney, the decision on use of the pipeline in the reverse direction does not exist, but Yanukovych reminded that "all his activity in the capacity of the premier was aimed at using the pipeline in the direction of Brody."

(snip)

He also informed that Yanukovych has asked Cheney that American oil companies moved from declarations to concrete proposals.

"The US vice president stated an opinion, and this the position of the American government, that the decision about the reverse flow of oil would sharply reduce the chances of Ukraine to play a key role of the country through which the energy will go to the Western Europe. Cheney has promised to keep an eye on this issue," Yelchenko said.

(snip)

Interfax-Ukraine
http://www2.pravda.com.ua/en/archive/2003/october/8/news/2.shtml
original source: http://www.interfax.kiev.ua/ukr/

Well. Looks like with $65 million you can really "keep an eye on the issue"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. Yuschenko urges followers to block Cabinet building to stop meeting
BREAKING NEWS

This is brief version.
Full version is available for subscribers only.


Yuschenko urges followers to block Cabinet building, as Yanukovych plans to chair government meeting on Wednesday


Kyiv, December 28 (Interfax-Ukraine) - Presidential candidate Viktor Yuschenko has urged his followers to come to the Cabinet building not to allow a government meeting chaired by Premier Yanukovych on Wednesday.

He addressed his followers in Maydan on Tuesday.

http://www.interfax.kiev.ua/eng/go.cgi?31,20041228010

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. Yushchenko Seeks to Bar Rival's Cabinet From a Meeting
Yushchenko Seeks to Bar Rival's Cabinet From a Meeting

By C. J. CHIVERS

Published: December 29, 2004


IEV, Ukraine, Dec. 28 - Tensions and risk flared anew in Ukraine on Tuesday after Viktor A. Yushchenko, the opposition leader and presumptive president-elect, called for his supporters to renew the blockade of a government building in the capital where the cabinet of ministers plans to meet early Wednesday.

(snip)

Even though the victory seemed clear, with Mr. Yushchenko receiving more than 2.2 million more votes than his rival, Mr. Yanukovich has refused to concede, saying he will challenge the election results in the Supreme Court.

(snip)

Mr. Yushchenko's campaign officials were suspicious and annoyed, however, and asked for the demonstrators on the square, who used mass civil disobedience to paralyze the country for more than two weeks after the Nov. 21 vote, to encircle the cabinet's building early Wednesday.

Many of the opposition's supporters remain in the tent cities they built in late November, when their demonstrations began, and Mr. Yushchenko appealed to them for yet another move against the state.

(snip)

"I would ask the population of the encampment early in the morning to start blocking the cabinet," Mr. Yushchenko said, to prevent what he called "the illegitimate government" from conducting state business. He did not say precisely what he feared Mr. Yanukovich might do

(snip)

Although the idea of a renewed demonstration against the government carried certain risks, Mr. Yushchenko did not call for the sort of activities he encouraged after the November election, which was tainted by widespread fraud.

(snip)

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/29/international/europe/29ukraine.html?oref=login

Unfortunate parallels running through my head :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
52. Ukraine has always been a weak state
Ukraine was an independent state since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. However, it was weak economically and was gradually drawn back into the Russian sphere of influence. I was dismayed by that. I have dreamed of an independent Ukraine since my childhood.

I am glad to see Yushchenko win because his win make Ukraine more independent of Russia. It gives Ukraine more options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. No.. It was a PNAC oil theft to make Ukraine another oil servant (article)
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 06:15 PM by Tinoire
At least that's been my take from the start of this. I've been following our war against Russia for decades, it used to be my job to be part of that war back when I was younger and more naive and I recognize a lot of the "interference" taking place in Ukraine right now.

Ukraine isn't going to have any more options than Poland got. It will be raped and looted by the West. I don't for one minute imagine that the French and Germans have any sort of noble intentions towards Ukraine. Oil and pipelines have a way of making the West drool.

I would like nothing more than an independent Ukraine but I don't believe this is it. Not by a long shot.

Do you truly believe that the Bush/Cheney cabal which invested over, way over, $65 million (because $65 million is only the "official" figure and only over the last 2 years) are going to allow it any independence? I don't. Not for a minute. Any more than I believed that the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq had ANY concern for Iraq's independence.

Same people. Same theft. My good wishes for independence to the people of Ukraine but that 50 whatever percent that voted for Yushchenko may be in for a brutal awakening. Like you, I want an independent Ukraine, for very personal reasons. Trust me, if Yushchenko doesn't turn out to be the West's puppet, I'll be the first to be thrilled.

Thanks for commenting :)

=====

The true story on the Ukraine crisis is that it has revealed a cold war East-West conflict regarding the Cheney/Bush administration's constant preoccupation with the control of OIL.

Free lance writer Larry Chin, who specializes in Geopolitical and Intelligence issues, lays out the grand chessboard design ~ backed up by comments from the chess master himself Zbigniew Brzezinski as well as Michel Chossudovsky ~ who wrote War and Globalisation . As such, Sec of State Powell's comments about ' consequences ' has little to do with democracy and everything to do with geo global Oil designs.

Excerpt: " Interference in Ukraine is one more example of the Bush administration’s desperate need to keep its oil-driven "war on terrorism" train from derailing ...... The failure to install a pro-Western government in Ukraine will gravely threaten the US energy conquest, and perhaps derail their imperial agenda altogether. "

Allen L Roland

=====

Cold War Crisis in The Ukraine
Control of oil: Key Grand Chessboard "Pivot" at Stake


by Larry Chin
www.globalresearch.ca 26 November 2004 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHI411D.html

The bitterly disputed Ukrainian presidential election, and the crisis that is exploding in the wake of the contested outcome, has re-ignited Cold War and a new round of East-West conflict over control of Eurasian/Caspian/Black Sea energy.

Against the backdrop of Peak Oil (also check energy-related coverage in From The Wilderness), this conflict could well decide the geo-resource direction of the planet itself.

(snip)

In an example of off-the-scale hubris and irony, outgoing US Secretary of State "we cannot accept this result as legitimate because it does not meet international standards and because there has not been an investigation of the numerous and credible reports of fraud and abuse".

(snip of other similarities with US 2000 election)

Why does Ukraine merit such furious and violent scrambling by the various parties?

Whichever powers manage to prevail will hold the key to the control of Eurasian oil and energy, the political control of the Eurasian corridor itself, and the survival of Russia as a nation.

Ukraine: key square on the "Grand Chessboard"

Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives has served as a blueprint for world dictatorship, and an incriminating predictor of the post-9/11 world conflict. Against today’s explosive headlines, Brzezinski’s words are, once again, nightmarishly relevant:

    "Geopolitical pivots are the states whose importance is derived not from their power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location and from the consequences of their potentially vulnerable condition for the behavior of geostrategic players. Most often, geopolitical pivots are determined by their geography, which in some cases gives them a special role in either defining access to important areas or in denying resources to a significant player ."

    "Ukraine, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Turkey and Iran play the role of critically important geopolitical pivots…

    "Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south.

    "However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.

    "Ukraine’s determination to preserve its independence was encouraged by external support. In July 1996, the US secretary of defense declared, "I cannot overestimate the importance of Ukraine as an independent country to the security and stability of all of Europe," while in September, the German chancellor…went further in declaring that "Ukraine’s firm place in Europe can no longer be challenged by anyone…"

    "Without Ukraine…an imperial restoration based on either the CIS 9Commonwealth of Independent States0 or on Eurasianism was not a viable option. An empire without Ukraine would eventually mean a Russia that would become more "Asianized" and more remote from Europe.

    "The states deserving America’s strongest geopolitical support are Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and (outside this region) Ukraine, all three being geopolitcally pivotal. Indeed, Kiev’s role reinforces the argument that Ukraine is the critical state, insofar as Russia’s own future evolution is concerned."


Then Brzezinski goes directly at Ukraine’s importance to world energy:

(snip / great read)


http://blogs.salon.com/0002255/2004/11/27.html#a581
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Clinton dumped USmoney into the former Soviet states for democraticization
I recall news stories (on NPR) that the US government was disbursing money to do things there like set up an independent media to have a free press (wouldn't one of those be great!). They were also spending money to somehow set up local political organizations. I have not compared the Clinton experience in those states vs. the US/Bush/Soros expenditures in Ukraine this year, but perhaps they both served the same (noble) goal.

I can see how Ukraine is such a pivotal state right now. I think the issue has been "dumbed down" in the American press as "Russia bad, US good".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Both did imo... Anyone who's been here a while can tell you
I've ranted about that before. Neo-liberals like Clinton & Soros are the velvet gloves, neo-cons are the iron glove. Either way it boils down to

a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs but the gold never goes to the people.

The issue has certainly been dumbed down. One-sided reporting and totally dumbed down.

I think we just turned a very bad corner in the Cold War. The neo-cons made sure we did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. I would say it certainly gives Yuschenko more options.
We will have to see how the Ukranians fare.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC