Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you had the opportunity to redesign government, where would you start?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SmartBomb Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:43 PM
Original message
If you had the opportunity to redesign government, where would you start?
I put it to the massive DU Collective Brain; what would you keep, what would you toss, what wholly new concepts would you introduce? Would it be a democracy or something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Term limits for all elected officials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. end corporate personhood
everything else will fall out from there.

KISS... end the corporate tyranny by removing their false rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly end the influence of the inhuman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossfish Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's a couple
Public campaign financing

Abolition of the Electoral College
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My pet idea: The "At Large" vote
Each person gets to vote for their local government, president, etc. in their state/district, as usual.

My idea is to add an "at-large vote" for each voter. Using their at-large vote, everyone has the opportunity to cast ONE vote per election on ANY race, ANYWHERE in the country-- but only ONCE.

A citizen in Los Angeles could use their single at-large vote in support of a candidate running for dogcatcher in Des Moines. A citizen of Boston could use their at-large vote for a senator in Pennsylvania.

Again, each citizen would have only ONE at-large vote to use ONCE per election.

My theory is that citizens have the right to elect those they wish to represent them. However, the at-large vote would allow people from other areas to mitigate the damage inflicted upon them by a single bad senator or representative.

It's just my little thought experiment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. how about proportional representation
As much as i appreciate the idea, it is half baked proportional
representation.... why not focus on the real deal.

In such regard, winner take all politics would end, and the people
would get fair representation in government based on the real
breakdown of the politics of the demographics.

Beyond that, a simple amendment making voting mandatory in democracy
would as well correct the systematic concerns you mention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Federal funds ONLY for elections, and stopping the two-way...
...migration between lobbying and elected office OR appointed position.

It's the only way to remove corporate taint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. #1 - ensure that the governmental branches are properly enumerated...
Edited on Tue Dec-28-04 06:35 PM by ChairOne
My Dream Changes:

The primary point of the separation of powers is to (a) make despotism hard, (b) thereby protecting everybody's rights. This is an excellent idea. Constitutional delineation of powers provides for explicit rights and responsibilities of the named powers. It works reasonably well for countries of small and moderate size, but I think a bit more is needed for larger countries.

First, a moderate increase in the power of the judicial branch:

In order that the House of Representatives actually *be* representative of the people, the judicial branch may hear and rule on petitions concerning the fairness of Congressional districts.


In addition to the legislative, executive, and judicial, two more powers need to be specifically mentioned, and their rights and responsibilities explicitly delineated.


===============
(4) The people.

The Constitution is high on their rights, but has practically nothing to say about their responsibilities. IMO we're now seeing the end result of this.

(a) 1-2 yr mandatory public service requirement.
For a variety of well-known reasons, insular, clannish people don't make good citizens of a heterogeneous nation. Mandatory public service is aimed at alleviating this problem. Service may take the form of military, civil domestic, or civil foreign service. Civil domestic and foreign service is aimed at things like the Red Cross, charities, and stuff like that. No service shall be performed within two states of the citizen's home.

(b) Education.
Idiots don't make good citizens of a advanced nation. This will no longer be a right, but rather a responsibility. A college education will be required of citizens. This education will include, but not be limited to, a basic proficiency in calculus, a foreign language, and literature. This education will be paid for by the state, to the extent that the citizen is unable to pay for it on his or her own. Scholars, and only scholars, determine the curriculum.
===============

(5) The Corporation.

The economic necessity of such an entity is without question. The situation with them has become rather like the people's - all rights, and no responsibilities. This must end. They must be recognized as a political power, with their rights and responsibilities clearly and explicitly stated. I'm not knowedgeable enough (yet) to give details, but here are some things I have in mind on the responsibility side:

(a) No offshore tax havens. Hell - no tax loopholes at all.

(b) The total earnings of an employee of the corporation shall not exceed more than N times the median employee's earnings.

(c) Something about regulating lobbying.

(d) Something about requiring a strong hiring preference for Americans, where feasible.

(e) Something about anticompetitive behavior.

(f) Anti-union behavior (on the part of the corp) shall not be tolerated.
================

The media can stay as they are, nominally. I think the responsibilities tacked onto the people and corporations suffice for the media's problems. A free press really *is* important.
================

Howzzat sound? lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC