Caught CNN saying that the recount in Ohio was over...Bush wins!

[PassingFair]

Sorry, no link. Did anyone else catch it? Guy said that Bush officially wins by 118,000 votes. Anyone? I only caught it out of the corner of my eye.

[GRLMGC]

1. well, geez, man

That was to be expected. The recount wasn't going to do anything. What we need is thorough investigations as to how those "votes" were obtained.

[PassingFair]

3. Ack! Here is a link for Washington Times...

:puke:

Try not to look at their "map"

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20041228-102805-1353r.htm

[dmac]

2. I am not surprised they are saying this

However I hope they are made to answer all of the questions put before them and explain why if the initial vote was accurate and fair, why they refused to cooperate on so many fronts in the recount process.

[johnaries]

4. So far, the Prima Facie (on the face) cases of fraud have

been discovered during the recount. The recount is fraudulent. What were they trying to hide during the recount?
They always get caught because of the cover-up.

[shadowknows69]

5. I saw it, made me wonder

how do you follow up on a story that you never covered in the first place?

[magellan]

7. Yep, they said it like they've been covering events in OH all along.

Imagine what their regular viewers were thinking.

"Huh? What do they mean the election's finally over in Ohio? What's been happening in Ohio??"

CNN = Censored News Network

[Dem2theMax]

9. You made me laugh on that one. Local news here in San Diego

did the exact same thing tonight, well, last night. It's now early Wed. morning. I was shocked to hear them even mention it. I didn't think they knew Ohio was a state in the Union, let alone that they knew anything about VOTING problems there.

[Raiden]

6. Fuck CNN!

I haven't watched them since the election and I don't intend to ever again.

[proudbluestater]

8. Gee, then, why are they too afraid to release the exit poll data?

If he really, truly, honestly won, why will they not turn over the RAW data? They claim they are not done "analyzing it." Hey, we don't want your PHONY, trumped up, added in extra votes, crap, we want the RAW stuff. NOW.

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[PassingFair]

11. Well then...

I guess it must be true!

[Name removed]

18. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Cobalt Violet]

12. Why are you so happy about it?

Are you a Bush supporter?

[Kathy in Cambridge]

13. Naughty, naughty!

:spank:

You can't ask such a question on DU! Someone may be oversensitive and take it the wrong way! :crazy:

[Cobalt Violet]

14. I don't like gloating.

:( I've done a good job avoiding it. But I hope it's not allowed here.

[Kathy in Cambridge]

17. I hate to see that crap on DU too

it's bad enough that there's gloating all over the mainstream media. I shouldn't have to deal with it on DU.

It sure has been smelly around here lately. :eyes:

[Behind the Aegis]

20. Yes it is!

I said this to you in another thread...I loves me some advanced search feature!!! Very, very EYE-OPENING! The real shame is that all newbies get grouped into the 'suspect' column. We were all newbies at some point...but this is getting insane! BTW..hello again,,seems we keep meeting the most 'interesting' people! heehee!

[Name removed]

15. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[MARALE]

19. Yes he/she is

A post and run Fr@@p@r I would say.

[Cocoa]

16. what recount?

is what most CNN viewers will wonder.