you can vote on "Should Bush have spoken earlier on the tsunami disaster"

[Demit]

at MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/ The poll is something like 67% yes, 33% no.

[Sporadicus]

1. Freeps Must Have Discovered It Too

Now 66% Yes - 34% No. I can't imagine anyone but a neocon apologist saying that * keeping quiet about the disaster for so long was just fine.

[xultar]

2. My statement...

Bush's inauguration costs 40 million and we are only offering 15 million. Geez, the Yankees payroll is 25 million. I think Bush should have a quiet inauguration we are @ war and 100k people may have been killed in the worst natural disaster in our lifetimes.

[Ian David]

3. My response to MSNBC

We loaned $35 million to the tsunami victims. We didn't give it-- we LOANED it. $35 million is what the New York Yankees pay in payroll taxes. $35 million is $5 million less than the cost of Bush's Innaugural Ball. Yet we gave $15 billion to hurricaine victims in Florida. While over 60,000 people died, Bush rode his bike and cleared brush at his ranch in Crawford. While planes flew into the World Trade Center, Bush sat and read to a third-grade class. How many more times must Nero fiddle while Rome burns? War President? My pet goat!

[Dawgs]

4. Amazing that 33% are that evil...

It must be a really hard life to not think for yourself.

[Catchawave]

5. 65-35 now :(

Who are those 35%? Argghhhhh.

[imax2268]

6. voted...

[bloom]

7. The question should be - "Is it possible for Bush to ever be wrong"

That would take care of most of these types of questions. Would probably always have the same results. App. 35% saying "no".

[Catchawave]

8. Now 61-39

...must be getting freeped ?

[proud2BlibKansan]

9. 61-39

thanks for the link

[Obamarama]

10. My response to MSNBC:

"I realize it took so long because Bush had to actually FIND Sri Lanka on the map first, but isn't there SOMEONE in the administration who could have helped him out before DAY FOUR of the tragedy??"