Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

smirk sold our gold mine (on Fed land) to Can corp.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:30 PM
Original message
smirk sold our gold mine (on Fed land) to Can corp.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/aplocal_story.asp?category=6420&slug=WA%20Okanogan%20Gold%20Mine&dpfrom=1

Permits issued for Okanogan County gold mine


A federal agency has issued mining patents to a company that wants to build a gold mine on Buckhorn Mountain, a move backers hope will give the project a long-awaited boost.

U.S. Bureau of Land Management Director Kathleen Clarke issued mining patents to Crown Resources Corp. on Dec. 21 after 12 years of review.

Crown Resources, a Denver-based gold development company, wants to dig a 1.2 million-ounce gold deposit from Buckhorn Mountain, near the Canadian border in northern Okanogan County.

-snip-

Kinross hopes to receive necessary environmental permits soon and begin construction in late 2005, he said.

The state Department of Ecology and U.S. Forest Service are preparing a revised environmental impact statement for the proposed mine.

-snip-

"It means that there's less land in the public domain, and a half a billion dollars worth of gold gets given away for no return," said Dave Kliegman, director of the Okanogan Highlands Alliance.

"If it was oil, they'd pay royalties. If it was coal, they'd pay royalties. But if it's gold, it's scot-free," he said.
-snip-
----------------------------------


bet your booties a lot of this money will go in the bushgang's pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gold mining is also one of the most toxic of all
as it uses mass quanitities of cyanide to turn tons of mountain into ounces of gold.

The Bush family owns interests in African gold mines doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Cyanide mining is no longer allowed
In WA, ID and MT.
Mining interests in MT tried to overthrow the law on the Nov ballot but it was voted down by a 75% majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. But it is still allowed in NV. :cry:
I'm glad the people of MT voted that proposition down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. poppa bush is acquainted with gold mines and I think

he has something to do with cyanide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The bush family owns or has intrests in
several gold companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Pat Robertson has many interest in Africa also!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Everytime I hear that commerical on diamonds that sez
"Every Kiss begin with Kay" I think of Pat Robertson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought his dad did that.
Last thing on leaving office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Poppy Strikes Gold
Some of the loot for the Republican effort in the 1997-2000 election cycles came from an outfit called Barrick Corporation. The sum, while over $100,000, is comparatively small change for the GOP, yet it seemed quite a gesture for a corporation based in Canada. Technically, the funds came from those associated with the Canadian’s U.S. unit, Barrick Gold Strike.

They could well afford it. In the final days of the Bush (Senior) administration, the Interior Department made an extraordinary but little noticed change in procedures under the 1872 Mining Law, the gold rush-era act that permitted those whiskered small-time prospectors with their tin pans and mules to stake claims on their tiny plots. The department initiated an expedited procedure for mining companies that allowed Barrick to swiftly lay claim to the largest gold find in America. In the terminology of the law, Barrick could “perfect its patent” on the estimated $10 billion in ore—for which Barrick paid the U.S. Treasury a little under $ 10,000. Eureka!

Barrick, of course, had to put up cash for the initial property rights and the cost of digging out the booty (and the cost of donations, in smaller amounts, to support Nevada’s Democratic senator, Harry Reid). Still, the shift in rules paid off big time: According to experts at the Mineral Policy Center of Washington, DC, Barrick saved—and the U.S. taxpayer lost—a cool billion or so.

Upon taking office, Bill Clinton’s new interior secretary, Bruce Babbitt, called Barrick’s claim the “biggest gold heist since the days of Butch Cassidy.” Nevertheless, because the company followed the fast-track process laid out for them under Bush, this corporate Goldfinger had Babbitt by the legal nuggets. Clinton had no choice but to give them the gold mine while the public got the shaft.

Barrick says it had no contact whatsoever with the president at the time of the rules change.<1> There was always a place in Barrick’s heart for the older Bush—and a place on its payroll. In 1995, Barrick hired the former president as Honorary Senior Advisor to the Toronto company’s International Advisory Board. Bush joined at the suggestion of former Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney, who, like Bush, had been ignominiously booted from office. I was a bit surprised that the president had signed on. When Bush was voted out of the White House, he vowed never to lobby or join a corporate board. The chairman of Barrick openly boasts that granting the title “Senior Advisor” was a sly maneuver to help Bush tiptoe around this promise.

I was curious: What does one do with a used president? Barrick vehemently denies that it appointed Bush “in order to procure him to make contact with other world leaders whom he knows, or who could be of considerable assistance” to the company. Yet, in September 1996, Bush wrote a letter to help convince Indonesian dictator Suharto to give Barrick a new, hot gold-mining concession.
more
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=207&row=4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Screwing of Cynthia McKinney
After George Bush Senior left the White House, he became an advisor and lobbyist for a Canadian gold-mining company, Barrick Gold. Hey, a guy’s got to work. But there were a couple of questions about Barrick, to say the least. For example, was Barrick’s Congo gold mine funding both sides of a civil war and perpetuating that bloody conflict? Only one Congressperson demanded hearings on the matter.

You’ve guessed: Cynthia McKinney.

That was covered in the . . . well, it wasn’t covered at all in the U.S. press.

McKinney contacted me at the BBC. She asked if I’d heard of Barrick. Indeed, I had. Top human rights investigators had evidence that a mine that Barrick bought in 1999 had, in clearing their Tanzanian properties three years earlier, bulldozed mine shafts . . . burying about 50 miners alive.

more
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=229&row=1
War is Golden for the Bush Administration

And the commodities connection? President Pretzel's relentless hissy-fit for war on Iraq has of course goosed the price of gold enormously--and that's set Bush Family coffers a-clinking. How so? In the waning days of his failed presidency, Bush I invoked an obscure 1872 statute to give a Canadian firm, Barrick Corporation, the right to mine $10 billion in gold from U.S. public lands. (U.S. taxpayers got a whopping $10,000 fee in return.) Bush then joined Barrick as a highly-paid "international consultant," brokering deals with various dictators of his close acquaintance. Barrick reciprocated with big bucks for Junior's presidential run. And in another quid for the old pro quo, last year Junior dutifully approved Barrick's controversial acquisition of a major rival. (Barrick is also one of the biggest polluters in America, by the way.)

Thus every step toward war fills Bush pockets quite literally with gold. That's the way they operate, these liars and thieves in thousand-dollar suits, these secretive fronts who profit from war, fear, blood and greasy palms. They arm the "monsters," they disarm the monsters, making money both ways. Then they drape themselves with Bible and flag, like smug pimps promenading to church, singing "Glory Hallelujah" while the whole world burns.
more
http://www.counterpunch.org/floyd02152003.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Barrick and Crown's parent Kinross own a couple of joint ventures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. "All your gold are belong to us." - BushCo
"Unless your family owns an oil well, a gold mine, or pharmaceutical company, there is no reason they should support the Republican party." - U.S. Citizen (not a resident of no steenkin "homeland")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where exactly will the newly mined gold end up? Carlisle?
Edited on Wed Dec-29-04 02:35 PM by whistle
...Follow the money (Carlisle Group and Carlisle Holdings are the same company):

http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2003/11/17/daily38.html

<snip>

* * Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC/TSX:K) – Kinross put up a good second quarter, announcing earnings of $6.6 million, versus a loss for the same time last year of $7.7 million. The firm reported production of over 22,000 ounces of gold at its Kettle River Mine near Curlew, Washington, but said the $243 an ounce cash cost of production was higher than expected. It also reported strong drilling results there.

KGC says its acquisition of Crown Resources is still under SEC review and the transaction should close this quarter. Included in the deal is Crown’s Buckhorn Mountain gold deposit in north central Washington -- about 40 miles from Kinross’ mill at Kettle River. Kinross plans to develop an underground mine at Buckhorn Mountain, which is a high-grade gold skarn reported to have almost a million ounces of total proven and probable reserves. During last year’s gold rise, KGC traded a good ways above $9.00. It’s trading lately on the Big Board at a bit over $ 6.00.

http://www.pennaluna.com/prospector.htm

and here is what Transnational.org shows which is part of the Carlisle Group, is it not:

Mining: Apex Silver Mines Ltd., Azco Mining Inc., Cambior, Inc., Campbell Resources Inc., Crown Resources Corp, Hecla Mining Co, Meridian Gold Inc., Metallica Resources Inc., Newmont Mining Corp., Pan American Silver Corp., Phelps Dodge Corp., Ryerson Tull Inc.,

http://www.transnationale.org/pays/mexp.htm

http://www.scom.com/aboutus.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC