Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kofi Annan was in Jackson Hole, WY for THREE days after Tsunami.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:29 PM
Original message
Kofi Annan was in Jackson Hole, WY for THREE days after Tsunami.
I am not a UN basher.

But this is almost as bad as W.

http://www.un.org/apps/sg/offthecuff.asp?nid=660

Q: Mr. Secretary, picking up on Richard's question, I think a lot of people are asking exactly why you waited three days on vacation in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, before you decided to fly back to New York in the face of this extraordinary crisis. Could you give us a full explanation of your thinking on that? Secondly, what kind of signal does that 72-hour delay send to the nations to which you are now appealing for greater help?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope, it's every bit as bad as W
Edited on Fri Dec-31-04 05:30 PM by Walt Starr
And it cannot be denied!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's where Cheney lives.
Where was Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Where the hell is Cheney?
When's the last time he was seen? I'm beginning to think he's dead, and they're working on the cgi version for TV appearances!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. Jesus, what if Kofi IS Cheney???
Omg

what if they are the same person.

and the undisclosed location is the Kofi suit?

The possibilities are endless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Why are you a UN basher?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
nymd81 Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. that's right!
the UN is a joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retired AF Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
56. I agree
I will support the UN when they add ethnic cleansing to their vocabulary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. If you're going to find fault with what happened in Rwanda....

...then you cannot leave the U.S. out. The U.S. could have done something and did not.

Also, please remember that the U.S. has supported murdurous dictators - as long as they support our policies.

What, in your opinion, should take the place of the U.N.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. But haven't you folks ever heard of the verb "to paraphrase"?
that's when you take a quote from Limbaugh or Buckley Jr or that dumbass on the NYT whose name I can't remember, or Will, and mix it up a little bit, kind of rearrange it, so it looks like you are having an original thought instead of being some neo-con's butt-boy bitch and quoting verbatim like the good master told you to after he zipped up and left for the evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #37
71. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. My biggest reason to support the UN is that the weed and his
admin hate it and are doing their damnedest to destroy it. Makes you wonder what are they afraid of? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
60. Did Rush tell you about the successful operations?
17 peacekeeping missions going on right now. Many past successful operations too.

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/index.asp

Many people have an ignorant dislike of foreigners. The right-wing is lead by leaders of *multinational* corporations like Halliburton. But to retain power, they exploit ignorant people's dislike of foreigners.
Ironic and sad, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
72. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's wrong with his answer?
"First of all, there was action. It wasn't inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don't have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don't have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

"I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don't have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nymd81 Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. it's the same thing Bush
said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I doubt it, but so what?
What's wrong with Annan's answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. So, do you have no problem
with Bush running things from Crawford, Texas?

Sorry, but you can't make a pass for Annan and then turn around on Bush for the same thing. Both should've put vacations on hold and gotten the fuck back to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Do you have evidence that bush did exactly that while on the "ranch"?
Then show it to me. That's all I'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. you left the answer out, Bush would never say this about August 2001
First of all, there was action. It wasn't inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don't have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don't have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don't have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Be Brave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thank you for providing the answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. No fair not including his answer
SG: First of all, there was action. It wasn't inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don't have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don't have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don't have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession.


:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Same answer W would give. Not good enough.
He should have left IMMEDIATELY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Cheney, huh
Edited on Fri Dec-31-04 05:38 PM by Last Lemming
Perhaps Annan was negotiating the end of the line for this administration Made Dick Cheney an offer that he couldn't refuse--he delivered a crucial message--rest of the world stands solidly beside Kerry--

Or maybe he was skiing

You gotta stop thinking rationally when you are governed by thugs--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truman01 Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have it from high level sources that Kofi Annan was meeting
with Dick Cheeny in Wyoming. They were talking about how they could cause another 50,000-100,000 people to die if they just waited a few more days to start anything happening.

Isn't that awful?

In this day of the information superhighway, I can work from home, or Italy, just as easy as I can my office. If we can, don't you think Kofi Annan can?

Cut the man a break.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. Kofi was telecommuting. Bush was drunk.
Who's the better leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Isn't that near Yellowstone?
Pondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulaFarrell Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. a great quote
"When we sometimes overwhelm them with high-profile visitors, we move people away from their work, and in fact we become more of a problem, an impediment, than actual assistance"

Was it a dig at Jeb? Or wasn't it? Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. My co-worker told me this
morning that they were sending jeb over there to assess the damage and she was all bummed out because her one consolation of bush getting in again was that we wouldn't have anymore of him after 4 years. But sending jeb over there was in her mind a way of getting him known "internationally"..and she has a point.

I told her after 4 more years of gwb that the US would not want to hear the name "bush" again. We can only hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nymd81 Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. no kidding!
He's just as bad or worse than Bush!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Why?
Edited on Fri Dec-31-04 06:15 PM by tuvor
I mean, WORSE THAN BUSH? Back it up, I'm more than curious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. What are you doing here?
Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Thought you were flying from Florida
to NYC to be in Times Square for New Years Eve? You weren't trying to pull one over on us were you?

:eyes:

BTW, I'm STILL waiting with bated breath for the name of that local Florida newscast that questioned Conyers' sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
65. "Loaner" account?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
67. Why don't you go over to where your buddies are @ FR
and enjoy a nice CJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. When was Annan's first public statement?
The issue, to my mind, is not where Bush was. It was his utter SILENCE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. zactly
this is the RW simply trying to DEFLECT again and they got DU'ers fall'n for it :puke:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
33. Yup. Criticism directed at Bush? "Hey look...
... there's someone else who did the same thing!"

Er, sort of. Well not really. But heck, mission accomplished -- now we're debating whether Kofi Annan reacted quickly enough, rather than driving the point home that Bush has FAILED AGAIN.

The repug side did this over and over again all throughout the campaign, and it worked every time.

Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just As Bad As Bush
And Tony Blair and Paul Martin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. You can't do that and not elaborate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Sorry
Bush, Kofi, Blair and Martin all didn't cut their vacation short.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Where is the problem in Annan's answer?
"First of all, there was action. It wasn't inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don't have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don't have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

"I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don't have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession."

He's saying he was working. Sounds to me like he cut off any vacation he was on. Until there's something more damning than that, I can't see why anyone has made up their mind that he was slacking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Well
Bush said the same thing and many people criticized him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Bush said the same thing... THREE DAYS LATER.
That's the issue, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
58. Can I please see your evidence?
There must be a link somewhere that you have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. He should have left IMMEDIATELY.
This is something Bush would say.

It doesn't pass the smell test.

They are both in the same boat now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. I Agree
That's what I was saying. These world leaders need to get their acts together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. People, lookit, this was God at Work.
Eggelund got badly misquoted and now these folks have tons of aid money.

Annan wouldn't have gotten the same response, he's none to popular right now because of the junta spin about his son and the food for oil program.

This may have been strategy, and it is Rovian it is so good. They put a non scandal related face on this tragedy and it ended up having a wonderful result.

So quitcher bitchen. Don't play into the hands of the right, let's get on with it and put the focus back on the victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. How is this playing into the hands of the right?
Instead of skiing, Kofi should have flew back to NYC. Instead of cutting brush or whatever Shrub does at his ranch, he should have went back to the White House. Same goes for Tony Blair and Paul Martin. When something like this happens, we need our leaders to be doing something, not relaxing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Link to "Annan was skiing"? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. He Was At a Ski Resort
So, he might have been snowboarding, but he strikes me as the skiing type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I see. Guess he was forced out of his room and onto the slopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Whatever
My point is that he should have cut his vacation short. It took him 3 days to get back to NYC. And BTW, I have never heard of someone spending their vacation at a ski resort and not skiing, snowboarding, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. I've never heard of a cowboy scared of horses,either,
but, hey, it takes all kinds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. "I've never heard of a cowboy scared of horses"
I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Boosh, yer phoney cowboy...
Remember him? The ex-cheerleader Yale who now acts like a stud,owns a "ranch" with no cattle which for normal people is called a farm?

Has the best education money can buy but fakes being stupid? Affects a southern drawl? Knows damn well how to pronounce nuclear but uses the southern pronounciation of genuine cracker Jimmy Carter?

Shall I go on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Ohhh, OK
I wasn't aware that he was afraid of horses. I always knew he wasn't a real cowboy and was just trying to emulate Reagan. But never knew about his lack of cattle and fear of horses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. The network anchors have not interrupted THEIR vacations either
Strange, isn't it? Sub anchors are on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. Mebbe so.
But this is a partisan site. We are generally anti-Bush, and will take every opportunity to criticise him that he gives us. Just because we don't criticise everybody else for similar behavior doesn't change anything. Some may not find us as 'credible" because of this, but too bad.

It just had to be said.
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. BTW - a check of freeperland shows them ready to nail us on this.
Lets not be hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. It's not the WHERE. It's the WHEN.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Not good enough. You don't stay on vacation ever. You leave, then talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Anyone who wants to make a story of this will embarass themselves
Europeans are sophisticated enough to understand this, Americans aren't, and they will just embarass us further by harping about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Well that point is debatable. What is not is the issue of Bush's silence.
Trying to tag Annan with Bush's failure seems like a smokescreen to me, and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. In these days of instant communication, that's a pretty arbitrary rule.
I'm seeing a lot of assertions on this thread, but nothing that stands up to any real scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. Since when do we have to worry about the "freepers?"
They don't need facts. They'll go with anything, I've never known them to worry about being correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. I will be selectively critical, and so what?
Why should I give a damn whether the freeps think I am a hypocrite or not?

Bill Clinton was not perfect, but I don't go looking for things to criticise him about. There are plenty of others who will do that.

Anyone who thinks that you have to be non-partisan to be truthful is mistaken.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
51. I notice that YOU deliberately skipped Kofi's answer, so here it is
YOUR deliberate OMISSION of Kofi's answer, reminds me of FOX and bush* minions....so I am putting the WHOLE queston/answer here, so as NOT to deceive DUers...notice how Kofi mentions NOT TO SEND HIGH PROFILE VISITORS like bush* just did by sending his brother jeb, and colin powell...

----------------------------------------------

Q: Mr. Secretary, picking up on Richard's question, I think a lot of people are asking exactly why you waited three days on vacation in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, before you decided to fly back to New York in the face of this extraordinary crisis. Could you give us a full explanation of your thinking on that? Secondly, what kind of signal does that 72-hour delay send to the nations to which you are now appealing for greater help?

SG: First of all, there was action. It wasn't inaction. We live in a world where you can operate from wherever you are. You know the world we live in now. You don't have to be physically here to be dealing with the leaders and the Governments I have been dealing with. You don't have to be physically here to be discussing with some of the agencies that we have done.

I came back here because we have reached a level that I wanted to have meetings with all the people that I have met with today. So, we have taken action. And I don't have to be sitting in my office to take action. I think the same goes for you in your profession.

Q: Given the magnitude of this disaster, shouldn't the United Nations, rather the United States, have taken the lead in establishing a coalition of donor and affected countries to deal with this disaster? And following up on the last two questions, shouldn't you, as Secretary-General, possibly be visiting the affected region to show moral support to the affected communities?

SG: First of all, on the question of how we pool the international community together, I think it is important that an initiative has been taken. We ourselves were discussing our possible initiative, but I applaud what has been done by the United States Government, by the United States Administration and President Bush. As I have said, we have spoken to other countries which are also going to join the group, and that group will be in support of the efforts that the United Nations is leading. So, we are very satisfied with that.

On the question of visits to the region, as I indicated, that is not excluded. But let me also say that we all need to be careful. When you have these sorts of massive emergencies, the urgent need is assistance to the people - shelter, food, water, health and other things. When we sometimes overwhelm them with high-profile visitors, we move people away from their work, and in fact we become more of a problem, an impediment, than actual assistance.

So, one should go to the region, but at the right time. Those who go to the region should make sure that they do not detract from the essential work that is being done, because it takes lots of efforts, and they have limited facilities. In some of these places, you often would not have even accommodation - and all the essential accommodation should go to those who actually doing it. So, yes, visit the region, but at the right time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
61. I keep hearing that. Is it really true Bush is afraid of horses?
Edited on Fri Dec-31-04 07:20 PM by Zenlitened
Maybe that's why the brush-clearing is as far as his little Reagan-wannabe act goes. :D

Edit: Oops, meant to post this in response to #59.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
62. What a joke.
Kofi did exactly what he was supposed to, utilized modern technology to address the situation immediately rather than taking a rushed trip to New York to prove a point to a bunch of people who apparently would rather have thier leaders conform to an outdated model of behavior than react quickly to SAVE LIVES.

It doesnt matter that Bush could have said the same things. I havent critisized Bush for not going to Washington and even if every liberal in the country did, it wouldnt make me, or them a hypocrite.

Im glad that the last thing anyone thought of during this tragedy is where a bunch of forum posters would feel better about them being while they took action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goathead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
73. James Baker III has a ranch near there
In Pinedale, WY, it is where he and Bush Sr. used to hold high level meetings to cut the world up into smaller pieces for them and their cronies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC