Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Last 2 Elected US Presidents to Appear on Larry Kling Live (sic) Tonight!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:20 PM
Original message
Last 2 Elected US Presidents to Appear on Larry Kling Live (sic) Tonight!
Tonight: Poppy & The BigDog. Check your local listings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shouldn't that be Clinton and Gore?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annus Horribilis Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No
Kerry and Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hell it should be Kerry & Gore! My bad.
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 07:22 PM by elehhhhna
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is this a repeat?
I am not going to watch. If Clinton says anything about how Dubya "won" I will smash my TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If I'm not mistaken,
I just heard that dubya wants the two to head up fundraising efforts for the tsunami victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. taking calls or just e-mails?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeilChimp Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think Poppy Bush's win was legit EITHER
No way Dukakis lost Maryland and California. Maryland was even more rock solid Dem in the 80s than it is today. (So was Conn., which Poppy also "won"), and Vermont looks suspicious as well.

They really didn't have anything on Duke other than the Willie Horton card. I think the Repugs manufactured several million votes in '88 because Duke got back all the Reagan Democrats. The Skull-and-bones crowd also tossed out thousands of minority votes in Maryland and elsewhere.

To be quite honest, I think they last time a repug presidential candidate's electoral count "victory" actually reflected ALL the votes cast was probably during the Einsenhower era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. California was a different state in 1988
It was a swing state at best, tending red, until the 90's. It was a feat on Dukakis's part to have come close to winning it. (The state wasn't called until the next day.) The blue-ing of the state showed up in 1992, when Clinton won, but it wasn't nailed down until Pete Wilson's idiotic advocacy of Prop 187, which alienated Latino voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeilChimp Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. that still doesn't explain the Repug's "win" in Maryland
Maryland is one of the most solidly Democrat states in the country. It's been that way for decades. The Repugs managed to sweep every state south of the Mason-Dixon in the last two elections and they still couldn't even come CLOSE to winning Maryland.

Kennedy, Humphrey, and Carter had NO problem winning Maryland during THEIR close elections, because Maryland is in the Dem column except when an absolute GOP landslide (Nixon, Reagan) nudges it in the other column.

Dems were running Maryland for 30 years straight. I did a quick check and here's who they elected during the Reagan era in 1988:

GOVERNOR
William Donald Schaefer (DEM)

LT. GOV.
Melvin A. Steinberg (DEM)

U.S. SENATE DELEGATION
2 DEMS, 0 REPUGS. Dems win in landslide.

U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION
6 DEMS, 2 REPUGS (and 1 of the REPUGS voted just like a DEM!)

The state was full of progressive leaders including Rep. Cardin, McMillen, Hoyer, Mfume (of the NAACP fame), Mikulski, Morella, and Senators Mathias and Sarbanes.


Now, compare this to the Presidential vote "totals" in Maryland

PRESIDENTIAL VOTE:
Bush/Quayle REPUG 876,167 51.11%
Dukakis/Bentsen DEM 826,304 48.20%

Hmmm. Poppy wins by exactly "50,000" votes. Funny how that works, eh? If you check the electoral map, you will also notice that Poppy LOST the neighboring state of West Virgina (which is full of "God fearin'" homophobes and is MUCH more right-wing than MD), yet somehow, he "won" a Progressive state that no other GOP candidate has been able to accomplish since then, even when Shrub got even HIGHER numbers in the south than Poppy Bush ever dreamed of.

Let's face it, the skull n' bones crowd was up to vote fraud tricks then, just as they are now. The Bush crime syndicate has never vote a legit election, even though they claim close in 1988. And California may have been much more a "Swing" state in '88, but without Reagan on the ticket, I'm find it fishy that they'd turn out in record numbers against Poppy only to "find" he won the narrowest of margins the next day. Even worse, look at Vermont's numbers in '88. Vermont had ceased being a Repug state by the mid 70s. Poppy "won" that state by only a few thousand votes.

Chimpy is NOT my president, and NEITHER was Poppy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Mondale and Dukakis both lost Maryland in the mid to late
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 11:45 PM by WI_DEM
80's. Prior to that while it was generally democratic, Humphrey's very narrow win probably was due to the Wallace vote. Nixon, of course, won it handily in 1972. Carter won it in both '76 and '80 probably due to his great appeal with African-American voters and moderate southern roots. Even in '80 the Carter margin was down substantially from his margin of 1976. Since 1992, Maryland like other Northern states such as California and Illinois have moved more solidly to the Democratic party. But we shouldn't take it for granted. In '02 Maryland voted for a GOP Governor and in '04 Kerry won Maryland by only half the margin that Gore did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. The sight of Poppy now makes me sick
because he greased the way for his stupid, mean, drunken, moronic offspring to wreak havoc on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Listened to most of it on radio.Clinton sucks.
Edited on Mon Jan-03-05 11:14 PM by Algorem
If he wants to kiss someone's ass he should get another girlfriend instead of the Bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Clinton is much more liked by the Bushies than Carter
At times it is a mutual admiration society between the chimp and Clinton and it's disgusting. Clinton has many times gone on record as saying how much he admires the chimps political skills. As for Carter, Poppy wanted to give him "a piece of my mind" at the Clinton Library opening for having Michael Moore sit in his box at the Democratic Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-04-05 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Carter!Carter!Carter! Are they drugging Clinton or something?
Bush I and his righteous indignation act is too much.When I see him do that I always think he's trying to get the person he's talking about killed.Hope Michael Moore's being axtremely careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OutsourceBush Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-05 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. They are going to explain to the middle class and poor why they
should donate all their money (what's left after 4 years of Bush) to disaster relief in Asia because billionaires and multi-national corporations in the US just can't afford to lend a helping hand. But, if they need billions for bombs, NO PROBLEMO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC