stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 11:28 AM
Original message |
My Simple Answer to Those Who Support *'s SS Scheme. |
|
"Name ONE thing that * has done that he hasn't totally fucked up."
Why would it be any different with Social Security?
|
Az
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
Inland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. LOL! Love the change in the last frame. |
|
Only difference between Bush's Iraq lies and his other lies are how fast we found out the truth. Bush will be retired a decade before the fiscal shit hits the fan, BY DESIGN.
|
LynnTheDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-05-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
2. And a very simple equation |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-05-05 11:33 AM by LynnTheDem
Under bush's plan, according to the Republican Committee, by 2042 you will only receive 75% of promised benefits.
If we do NOTHING AT ALL to SS, by 2052 you will get 81% of promised benefits.
And the amount needed to FULLY FUND ss at 100% into the 2100s is LESS than what we're spending now in Iraq.
And them's REPUBLICAN facts.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |