Messages at WPost.com are very negative

[spooky3]

Check out:

http://forums.washingtonpost.com/wppolitics/messages?msg=3305

[nomaco-10]

1. Thanks for the link

There certainly are some very passionate and eloquent posters there, some really well written stuff.

[carrowsboy]

2. site is down

either too many posters or the WH had the paper remove it

[kaos]

3. Even freeperland is pissed....

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/977824/posts

Does this man have any concept of money whatsoever?

Short answer? No. I heard it on Fox right before he started to talk, something around 60 billion for day to day operations and another 20 billion for something else. But who cares? It's just 'paperwork' to the administration now. God only knows how we're going to pay for it...


8 posted on 09/07/2003 5:48 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice).......

Can I have $87 billion? I've spent my allowance but I want to go to war tonight.


15 posted on 09/07/2003 6:02 PM PDT by Djarum

over $300 for every man woman and child in the country. I wonder when parents should break the news to their young children that they are going to work an extra few years to pay for this

A few extra years for $300? Man, I'd heard that employers were getting stingy about pay, but I never thought it had gotten that bad.


17 posted on 09/07/2003 6:14 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast

[disgruntella]

4. i just visited

The defenders of Bush complain that Democrats "just can't say anything good about Bush, they attack him no matter what he does." If I wasn't getting sleepy I would register and ask them the last time they said anything good about Clinton?

Maybe someone else will bring that up...

[SeveneightyWhoa]

5. Anything "good" about Clinton?

It appears to me that you've forgotten that there WAS nothing good about Clinton. He got a blowjob, remember? He's evil!

[disgruntella]

6. i am hoping that is sarcasm

I read a funny quote somewhere (I think All Hat, No Cattle) where a woman talked about how hard Clinton worked as president compared to "4-week vacation" Bush Jr. It was something like, "That was a real president, and he deserved every blow job he got!"

(Edit: That's ALL Hat, No Cattle... LOL)

[Clete]

8. Now that's funny.

Many clueless people, who voted for Bush, did so because he was moral and Gore was probably immoral because Clinton was immoral. There was no thought it their minds as to what kind of President he would make.
Now let's hope that they realize that they'd better think about the issues first before they cast that ballot for a flakey unrelated reasons.

[opihimoimoi]

13. And please tell us what pub don like blowjobs....?? They all do and if

a Monica came on to them... in a heart beat. Maybe not all of them, but most.

Das all I have to say about the matter, LOL.

Come, we go Sam Choys, eat reef and beef.

[alphafemale]

11. LOL! Welcome. Careful with the sarcasm though.

At least 'til we're more familier with 'ya.

:toast:

[Gloria]

7. The site seems to be working now.....scathing collection of posts!

eom

[grasswire]

9. why are so many deleted???

It's very hard to read the thread because so many posts are deleted. Looks like about 1/3 of them!

[pruner]

12. TOS violations

apparently telling Bush defenders just how absolutely fucking retarded they are is against the rules.

[gristy]

10. scathing, just scathing.

WP readers are ALL OVER *. I read the first 34 posts. Two of them were supportive. Many of the other 32 were deleted! I do not understand why so many. ALL of the others in this first group were slammin' shrub against the wall. OMG, it is amazing.

I can't WAIT to see the poll numbers in the coming weeks.

The BFEE: Evil? Yes. Smart? Absolutely NOT. Bush and his cabal are showing themselves to be even more clueless than Ken Lay and his pals who raped Enron while driving it into the ground.

[IkeWarnedUs]

14. Did you see this post by the forum moderator?

"In sharing your thoughts, please remember the washingtonpost.com Rules of Discussion to which you agreed when joining our forums. Name calling and profanity are unacceptable and will be deleted. Those violating the rules will lose posting access on all washingtonpost.com Forums.

Please use civility in your discussion."

-----------------------

All the posts coming down hard on Bush that are there, I wonder how bad were the ones they deleted?