hector459
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:29 AM
Original message |
So, Bush doesn't have to answer a damn question. He hasn't so far! |
|
Even the Republicans should be ready to impeach him. They would be if they weren't so greedy and dishonest.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. HE DOESN'T ANSWER ANYTHING |
|
JUST REPEATS THE SAME MINDLESS SHIT OVER AND OVER. DID HELEN SPEAK YET? GET HIM GIRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
Liberal In Texas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
2. That's why no "follow-ups"...less of a chance he could be pinned down |
|
or have to come up with another way to say the same pre-arranged answer or talking-point.
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You would think that the speaker of the House would be |
|
rearing to go, he basically is the next in line. Cheney wouldn't last 10 minutes in the job, he would have a heart attack and kick. The speaker could push for articles of Impeachment, bush would be impeached or resign, Cheney would assume the position for a few moments, have a heart attack, the speaker would become president.
|
Hand
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Bad idea... Speaker of the House=Dennis (Lardass) Hastert=Tom ("If he starts foaming at the mouth, you grab his arms, I'll grab his legs") Delay=undisguised and unbridled theocratic fascism=:nuke:
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-26-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I know but the implosion of the repukes would be fun to watch |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message |