This is the largest ant-war protest in a generation
that the New York Times completely ignored last year.
It was front page news across the globe, except in USA.
It was front page news BUT the New York Times
had NOTHING, NADA, ZIP, ZILTCH, NOT A GOD DAMNED THING !
The New York Times covered-up and 'protected' their boyking.
The New York Times refused to cover the news that the entire
world was reporting in detail.
The New York Times had been bought off by the Bushitas.
here's what the New York Times ignored.
It was the LARGEST anti-war protest since Vietnam.
It was the Largest anti-war protest in over 30 years
yet the New York Times, even though it has a office in London,
failed to somehow reven report on the anti-Bush protest the next day's
Sunday newspaper, or the Monday paper (except a single sentence buried
in an artcile about Blair's troubles, it mentioned large anti-war protests during the past weekend. YUP - that was all the NYwhores reported)
http://uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=42598&group=webcastYup.....according to the NYTimes....this wasnt news worthy -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=8180&forum=DCForumID60http://germany.indymedia.org/2002/09/30614.shtml