Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Please don't refer to them as "pro-life"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stop_the_War Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:53 PM
Original message
Please don't refer to them as "pro-life"...
they are ANTI-CHOICE. It's more realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
melv Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. right on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree...(n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've also heard the term... Pro-birth bandied about.
Current events should make it clear the RWers care *nothing* about
life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Slight correction: pro-FORCED birth
Nothing wrong with birth... unless it's against your will, like these bastards are gunning for!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. I prefer to call it Involuntary Gestation
So those who oppose abortion - and often also any "artificial" birth control - and especially those who say "the physicians job is to save both" and using that rationale they claim that abortion even in cases of rape, or incest, or danger of death to the pregnant woman, deliberate abortion is still not an acceptable "option".

I actually often refer to such a person as a Pro Involuntary Gestator (PIG).


- Eileen`s always in process page -


Eileen

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pro REPRODUCTIVE SLAVERY
is the correct term.

They don't give a hoot about the living. They only want any woman who allowed a man to do "that" to her to be enslaved to the possible result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. That's the most accurate discription of what they are.
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 04:16 PM by BrklynLiberal
To repeat Florynce R. Kennedy's famous quote
"If men got pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament"
(I had been giving Simone deBeauvoir credit for that quote, but it is actually American lawyer and women's rights activist Florynce Kennedy who said it. She also said "Don't agonize. Organize!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Most of them are pro-birth
But if one is anti-abortion, anti-death penalty, anti war in Iraq and is an advocate of children's programs, health care and education then I have no problem calling them pro-life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually not, to be completely accurate
you'd have to call them anti-abortion. They can't be pro-life because so many of them support the death penalty. They can't be anti-choice because even if the pregnancy is brought to term there are choices to be made which they acknowledge. The only thing left is anti-abortion which is the only choice they want to suppress.

Besides, it irritates the #ell out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booksenkatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. So how should I classify my Dem pals who are against abortion?
They can't stand the idea of abortion, but they are very much pro-choice because they understand that it should be a woman's choice.

Damn these semantics, LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Against abortion? I guess it's a matter of degree.
If someone is actively trying to remove abortion from the list of options they are obviously "anti-abortion". If they don't approve but respect the right to choose that option I don't see that as "anti-abortion" or "anti-choice". I see that as a perfectly reasonable stand on the issue: "I won't have one, but what others do is up to them."

I have a great deal of respect for those who can have a contrary opinion but do not wish to visit it by force on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pro -life might imply that they were against
Wars of Conquest
Death penalty
medical care for the sick
anti choice is the only name for the Am. Taliban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daydreamer Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Name is very important
You have to give GOP credit for coming up with good names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yes, you do.
The GOP has successfully defined the DEM party. It is important to note that regardless how angry us Dem's get we are labeled as "whiners". BS! I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore. Every time I get an email from a Repub telling me I'm whining I "reply to all" with the largest text Eudora offers with one line: Get this straight, I'm not fucking whining, I'm yelling at the top of my voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree, they are anti-choice, imo
Often the same people who are anti-choice about abortion are anti-choice about many other rights as well. Even if abortion is the only issue they are anti-choice, there is no question they are against a woman's right to choose, ergo anti-choice is appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. Their position is best described as Anti-Abortion, not Pro-Life
One cannot support wars and capital punishment and reasonably claim to be pro-life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. If their only concern was the life of the unborn, why do they campaign
Edited on Tue Feb-08-05 04:23 PM by BrklynLiberal
against sex education, pre-natal and post natal care, HIV care and information, birth control information and medication and giving funds to organizations that provide those things to poor women, both here and around the world? What does that have to do with "preserving the sanctity of unborn life"?
They are all about controlling women's minds and bodies.
While these groups support pharmacists being able to deny women birth control pills due to their "conscience", I would like to see these groups support pharmacists who have the nerve to say no to a man asking for Viagra or condoms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Because they are motivated out of religious dogma
And not out of any concern for the welfare of women or children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. They are PRO-FETUS, not pro-life...
Pro-life wouldn't be blowing away Iraqi families, letting kids starve to death after they are born, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. So what would you label me?
No smart ass comments please.

Really how should people like me be labeled?

*anti-abortion(not based on any religious belief)
*Low cost and free contraceptives for teens without parental permission
*Plan B over the counter
*Real sex education in schools instead of the "abstinence only" crap
*Better support and care for young and poor mothers
*anti-Death Penalty
*anti-war(unless we are REALLY defending ourselves)
*Full on democrat except for this one issue
*Don't support the pro-life movements because well thier ideas are religion based, don't work and are meant to punish women.
*I have put my money were my mouth is and spent my time supporting young mothers.

I had one poster classify me as Pro-Prevention but I really think all Pro-choicers are also Pro-Prevention so how would you all label me?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. That depends on your answer to one specific question.
Do you favor the illegalization of abortion.

If your answer is NO then you are pro choice but willing to work for the real provision of abortion alternatives.

If your answer is YES then you are in favor of the demotion of women to second class status through denial of rights; in favor of the treatment of fetuses as 'persons' entitled to rights that nobody else is constitutionally entitled to; the removal of the right to bodily autonomy from women; the enslavement of women to their biological limitations as defined by others; and the involuntarily forced risk of death and a definite certainty of bodily injury, without knowing to what extent, for life, on fertile women.

You can call that stand whatever you like but it is certainly not in line with the democratic ideology.

- Eileen`s always in process page -


Eileen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. I agree. They are PRO-GOVERNMENT INTRUSION & ANTI-FREEDOM.
In addition to being ANTI-CHOICE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
namvet73 Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. 100% Pro-Life seems logically impossible!
In the case that giving birth makes death inevitable for the mother, then the choice of being anti-choice is impossible. One must make the choice.

OK, whose life do you terminate the mother or the child?

Why is this question rarely used to challenge anti-choicers?

Even if it is considered martyrdom or saintly to give one's life for the baby, death has been chosen.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. They are Pro-birth, then it's "may the best man win."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Thank you.. I am pro-life, I am ANTI-WAR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mystified Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. Does that mean
That instead of refering to others as pro-choice we should instead say "Pro-Death" or "Anti-Life"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC