Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kurtz: AIM outraged at invasion of Gannon privacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:13 AM
Original message
Kurtz: AIM outraged at invasion of Gannon privacy
It sure is odd that someone craving so much privacy posts pictures of his dick all over the web. Mean Liberals made him do it. Yeah, that's the ticket:

Cliff Kincaid, editor of the Accuracy in Media report, wrote on the conservative group's Web site: "The Gannon 'scandal' would be laughable, were it not for the fact that Gannon's personal privacy has been invaded and his mother, in her 70s, had to endure harassing telephone calls from those on the political left trying to dig up dirt. The campaign against Gannon demonstrates the paranoid mentality and mean-spirited nature of the political left."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A27730-2005Feb15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Accuracy In Media??
He's obviously doing a smashing job with that! Does he even question that this guy was a shill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Check it out
if you dare. It is a total RW windbag piece of crap website...

http://www.aim.org/index
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. No kidding...look at this as an example of their idea of "Accuracy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. He trusted us not to look at all those nudie pictures and we let him down!
I feel like a dog, I tell you.

:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. We must respect Gannon's privacy ......
......
Sincerely,
The cum stain on Monica's Blue Dress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whew!
For a moment there, I thought that the American Indian Movement had gone conservative.

Mind you, I once thought that "Niggaz 4 Life" was the name of a radical African-American anti-abortion group.

--p!
The Original Great White Brother
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noise626 Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. oh man...thanks for making spit coffee everywhere!!
now I gotta go clean my keyboard :)

pax
ant

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. I had the same response...
"AIM supporting Gannon?!? WTF?!?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. How dare those meanies!
I mean, who among us hasn't posted pictures of his or herself urinating or fully aroused or lying face down on a bed with nothing between us and the camera except a suggestively placed jock strap?

*crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Those damned liberals!!!!!!!!!!...
I mean, it is not like the VRWC ever did anything similar!? Hmmmmm.....I can think of a few...Pres. Clinton, Sen. Kerry, Sen. Clinton. I am sure there are at least a few more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Someone should ask Churchill about
"paranoid mentality and mean-spirited nature of the political right."

THe left can't even begin to match the right wing who make comments like the one I saw on FR the other day about a federal judge and how she would be "a waste of a perfectly good bullet".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kurtz is on the payroll-what coin is he being paid with
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 10:41 AM by jmcgowanjm
My, my, such lovely names! The Washington Times did a
front page story on this joker some time back, by the way, but
no one dared to touch him because of what, and whom,
he knew…and serviced…”

Washington Post
July 24, 1990:
The alleged leader of what authorities have called the
largest male prostitution operation in the Washington
area surrendered to federal agents yesterday and pleaded
not guilty to racketeering charges that have been filed
against him and three alleged accomplices. Henry W.
Vinson, 29, of Williamson, W.Va., a coal miner's son accused
of
setting up the homosexual escort service...

http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a1376.htm

Mr. Guckert was denied credentials to cover Capitol Hill,
where press gallery workers said that his application
indicated Talon was not his main source of income and that
they could not verify its
legitimacy.

Karl Frisch, a spokesman for Ms. Slaughter, said: “This is a
guy who could not get credentialed by the House or the
Senate press galleries, and yet managed to get into the
White House and question the president” and have access to
a top-secret document.

He added: “To imply he has no connection to the White House
is just not credible.”

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p%3D7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. To maintain my privacy I opened a website
and put nude pictures of myself on it. Don't look and don't tell anyone. Gosh, the professional conservative journalists in this country sure don't want that story to reach America do they. I wonder what their professional concern is based on. Its almost as if there opposition was a planned and staged event. Gosh, they sure can mobilize. Gotta love those professional conservative journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Let Howie know how you really feel--
kurtzh@washpost.com

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. HEY, AIM! "GANNON'S" PRIVACY WAS NOT INVADED.
Edited on Wed Feb-16-05 10:24 AM by tuvor
"Hey, websurfers all over the world! Check ME out! Wanna pay for nookie?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
14. Perhaps
Perhaps we should get a special prosecutor to subpeona him for a deposition, ask him personal questions about his sex life, then televise his deposition for all of America (including children) to see even though there is a court order against its airing.

Oh, wait. That is what the conservatives did to an elected President with all too eager accomplices in the SCLM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. His privates were invaded when he posted nude photos of them
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. AIM's got a great racket
They can be a mean spirited and disingenuous as they want, but when they perceive even a bit of mean spiritedness on the left they shriek like a 3 year old.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. and my thing is, couldn't Kurtz find someone who makes sense
to interview for this story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Pay no attention to the naked gay conservative male prostitute
sitting in the middle of the family values
White House as a shill.

http://buzzflash.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. This complaint from the folks that wanted to expose Clinton
seems like the idiots hunting Clinton wanted to get a photo of his "private parts" -- and we know that the photo would not have been kept private by the Starr gang.

This guy put up his private parts up on a website -- with all the details of his job -- for the world to see -- as in "World Wide Web".

Now . . . booo hoooo they are feeling sorry for this piece of human garbage?

Ironically Gannon's voice doesn't match his body. When I heard his voice I had a picture of him -- the short fat boy in school that tries to be teacher's pet.

My question -- WHO was behind the camera?? WHO took the photos? WHO is his partner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. Classic.
"It sure is odd that someone craving so much privacy posts pictures of his dick all over the web."

This should be added to that one-liners thread. Too funny.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. Caligula in the WH?
Democrats were also involved in this as well, so don't
expect them to expose the
sex ring.

http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_sex_coverup/franklin.htm

You know I didn't pay attention to this until this
post:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1240689
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Also, all child-porn investigations warn, er, ah, involve feds.
The feds have invited all local investigations of child abductions and child porn to notify the feds. So the feds can aid the investigation of course.

What a great warning system for themselves if this stuff is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. apparently
all retardicans and many amerikan sheeple have no memories from the time before W a.d.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. David Brock coming up on AAR
Hopefully he will discuss this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bethany Rockafella Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
27. Poor Guckert.
I'll bet you'll think things further before posting tons of dick pics on the world wide web. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC