elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:09 AM
Original message |
"Will Have Sex For Money" is Gannon's sacred "personal life"? |
|
Hey, Jeffro, you're in good company, ya poor persecuted hypocrite! OJ, Gotti, Dahmer...these folks and many more would be happier today if the media had respected their "personal life".
Maybe he meant his "personals-life"?
|
Bethany Rockafella
(916 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I really don't think Gannon should be lumped in with people |
|
that have murdered. Gannon is amusing, let's give him a break.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Martha Stewart, Heidi Fleiss, and fill-in-the-blank then.
|
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Judith Miller and Mathew Cooper
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. I don't get that analogy. Please elaborate? |
Beetwasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Give Him A Break?!?! Are You Fucking Nuts!!! This Piece Of Filth |
|
Nazi, bootlicking, fascist-enabling, hypocritical Gay-but-Gaybasher-Anyway scumbag deserves everything he gets and then some.
Kick the fucker in the nuts and then spit in his face.
Give him a break? Fuck that...
|
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. no way give him a break....he is propaganda proof |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 11:34 AM by julialnyc
If this was a straight woman PROSTITUTE we would have gotten way past the sex angle and dug into the prostitution angle. He plastered his penis all over the INTERNET and now says his personal life is being intruded on. No way......his package of information has yet to really be opened.
What's up with all of this "poor gay Jeff/James"....... if he's gay than that's who he is and who the fuck cares, but he was spewing propaganda, knew things before other media outlets, and had a background that wouldn't pass a background check.
|
Bethany Rockafella
(916 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. The personal life crap that he is spewing, of course, |
|
...there, he shouldn't get a break. That was not personal and private. It was public. And it was awful what he did with his articles demonizing liberals and democrats. But for some reason, I think Gannon will switch on us. If you think about it, everything this guy did in his "private life", is more in sync with liberals...not conservatives. Once he find out the Roves in the repuke party will use him, he may come around.
|
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. he is a perfect example of a Republican |
|
He is swimming in hypocrisy.
|
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. The sex angle may be amusing |
|
But the knowing of shock and awe before it happened....being implicated in the Valerie Plame case..........and not only getting in, but always being called on are not amusing.
You have to add upp the equation. Gannon + Armstrong Williams + the others that we know about + the ones we don't know about = a very huge problem
|
MeDeMax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. that is a very cool equation |
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
10. anyone who thinks that he won't be looked up |
|
when he calls democrats "divorced from reality" is asking to be looked into.
|
leftofthedial
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
11. it's not "personal: when you advertise it |
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. It's not your private life when you advertise your privates! |
Spike from MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Gee, it was perfectly OK to dig into Clinton's personal life. |
|
That was fair game. But Gannon advertises his "services" on the friggin' web AND posts nude pictures of himself and he thinks he should somehow be "off limits." Oh wait. Does that mean no one can ever be arrested for prostitution because it's their "personal life" and no one else's business? Sorry buddy. Your personal life ceased to be personal once you posted the pics and the price list on the web. And prostitution is illegal last I heard. Except of course if you're a politician in which case it's apparently part of the job description.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. If your naughty bits are off-limits don't post their pics on the Internets |
julialnyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-25-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. If this were a liberal journalist |
|
it would be Christmas for the republicans
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |