ohkay
(286 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 01:59 PM
Original message |
|
someone one a different board just wrote ( I am not making this up):
"No woman is 100% gay. It's usually a mix of posturing and threatrics."
Some appropriate responses please!!
|
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ask them if they think... |
|
...anyone is 100% asexual?
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Kinsey reported that we were all on a scale of hetero/homo - at least |
|
that is what I got from the movie. As to the reality of that - personally I think if you are at the end of the hetero side of the scale - you may go 120 years and never have a though about 'getting with' a memeber of your own sex.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Science says - If you could actually devise a VALID test for any |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 02:20 PM by patrice
characteristic or quality, in this case, homosexuality, the results from using your test will show the trait very strong for a very few people, very weak for a very few people, and some mix (with a mean, median, and mode) for MOST of the people.
The person's remark is very dismissive of the real differences between individuals, demonstrates lack of respect. If you could politely tell her so, she might get mad anyway, but if you could make it work, she might get something to think about.
|
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Scientifically, there are no absolutes, only probabilities. |
|
And that statement is so true that it is true of itself also, i.e. the statement itself is not an absolute.
Go with "the flow", Hare Krsna!
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Just another version of the sexist line of |
|
all any woman who is unhappy, mad, whatever, needs is a really good fuck. Like dick is somehow like air or water that we can't live without.
Just point out that's what AA batteries are for.
|
OneMoreDemocrat
(548 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. That doesn't make any sense........... |
|
I'm assuming of course that the AA batteries you referred to are used in an appliance that is meant to mimic an actual male member, so clearly there is some kind of need or desire for 'engagement' as it were.
This is not to say that a woman needs a man to make her happy, but your post referred to only one part of said man.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Clearly you don't understand the concept of |
|
clitoral stimulation, which has zero to do with actual penetration.
lol.
|
OneMoreDemocrat
(548 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I understand it well.......... |
|
And now you clarified your post.
Thanks.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I should have been more specific then. |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 02:39 PM by kaitykaity
;)
|
OneMoreDemocrat
(548 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Hey, what's that tongue for? |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-24-05 02:40 PM by OneMoreDemocrat
:D
Oops.
|
kaitykaity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I figured I need to be a little less |
freestyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-24-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. But some people are 100% offensive and dumb. |
|
Actually, the first sentence is almost true. Very few people are 100% gay or straight if thoughts and actions are taken into account. We almost all exist on a continuum and may not always be at the same place. Ain't life grand?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |