Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2004, the first year the electoral map colors did not reflect incumbency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:28 PM
Original message
2004, the first year the electoral map colors did not reflect incumbency
It used to be every four years, the electoral vote maps would be colored based upon the incumbent party. Blue was the coloir of incumbency and red was the color of the challenging party.

As of 2004, that no longer held true. For the first time, Red was the color of Republicans and Blue was the color of Democrats, and this is the way it shall remain forever more.

So, to re-coin a phrase:

BETTER DEAD THAN RED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it HAD to be this way..
The "Bush'ites" would not be able to identify themselves if they had to THINK about what color they were supposed to salute :)

Republicans do NOT do nuance:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Why did they plump for red??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somnior Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Really?
I'm ashamed of my ignorance (on however small a matter)!

I've only really "grown up" (I'm still young) since the 2000 election. I would have sworn that Republicans had used/been represented by red for years, at least into the 80's.

I like blue better, anyway. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They were represented by Red in 1980
Carter was the incumbent that year.

They were represented by Blue in 1984, 1988, and 1992. 1992 was another year where the map was mostly red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somnior Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Speaking of colors
http://www.moral-politics.com/xPolitics.aspx?menu=Home

On the matter of colors and ideologies, a friend sent me to this site recently. Not knowing if, perhaps, it's been posted at DU in the past, and also pretty sure I can't start threads myself yet, this seemed as good a place as any to mention it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. and red was ridge's HS
full bore, 21 whistle, full volume alarm alert 4 terrorists strike!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. The colours are inverted in Britain.
Red is Labour's colour, Blue the Conservatives. The Lib-Dems get yellow, Greens get green, it varies for the other parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Blue's better -- red reminds me of
those butt-ugly fireengine red suits that Republican freaks like Nancy Reagan and Kay Baily Hutchinson wear. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's interesting.
You're right; dems and repubs didn't have colors, until recently.

Makes sense, what with the Greens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if they did this to further polarize people
The whole red-state/blue-state thing feeds into an us vs them mentality. "Liberals are the enemy" and so forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC