Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fine for indecency bigger then if you caused a nuclear mishap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:21 AM
Original message
Fine for indecency bigger then if you caused a nuclear mishap
When the Federal Communications Commission fined Clear Channel Communications $27,500 last year for each of eighteen incidents of "indecent material" spouted by shock jock Howard Stern, it sure seemed like a lot of money. But in retrospect those fines look like chump change. On February 16th, the Bush administration won House approval for a bill that would raise the maximum FCC fine to $500,000 per violation. Under the new measure, Clear Channel -- and Stern himself -- could each have been fined a total of $9 million.

"Free expression and First Amendment rights are the real target of this legislation," declared Rep. Bernie Sanders (Ind-Vt.) during the debate over the bill. "This is not what America is about."

A review of fines levied by other federal agencies suggests that the government may be taking swear words a bit too seriously. If the bill passes the Senate, Bono saying "fucking brilliant" on the air would carry the exact same penalty as illegally testing pesticides on human subjects. And for the price of Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the Super Bowl, you could cause the wrongful death of an elderly patient in a nursing home and still have enough money left to create dangerous mishaps at two nuclear reactors. (Actually, you might be able to afford four "nuke malfunctions": The biggest fine levied by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission last year was only $60,000.)

If Bush has his way, Howard Stern may soon have a tough choice to make: Tell a sex joke on the air, or dump toxic waste in New York's drinking water while willfully placing an employee at risk of injury or death? No wonder the foul-mouthed host is moving to satellite radio, which falls outside the authority of the FCC.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/7047694/bobdylan?pageid=rs.NewsArchive&pageregion=mainRegion&rnd=1109431265625&has-player=unknown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's the same for non-violent drug users
who are given much longer sentences than people who rape or steal or assault others.

Some Justice. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. This country is lead by some stupid people. But we all must dumber for
accepting this kind of bullshit, while attacking those who would speak out against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bigger than a fine handed out by OSHA after a fatal accident
I do believe... Better dead than indecent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, yes, but... how many people killed themselves after Nipplegate?
Do you realize the scope of the death and destruction wrought in the aftermath of seeing Janet Jackson's nipple?

Do you think those tens of thousands of people would have complained if lives didn't hang in the balance?

Think of all those poor children who were orphaned when their parents couldn't take the image of the nipple anymore?

If you don't believe me, watch this clip:

Helms - Teatgate 2004: The Aftermath -- Ed Helms and Stephen Colbert go tit for teat in their explosive coverage of Janet Jackson's breasts.

http://www.comedycentral.com/mp/play.jhtml?reposid=/multimedia/tds/helms/helms_8095.html

THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
signmike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. There was a lot of information in
"A Child's Garden Of Grass", a book about marijuana, about 30 years ago. In one state, Kentucky, I believe, the penalty for possession of even one roach was 20 years in prison, whilst poisoning a public reservoir carried a 6 month jail term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC