Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maybe Vetwife had a point

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:31 PM
Original message
Maybe Vetwife had a point
First of all, I don't believe she was a troll. She genuinely believed in a lot of the issues we believe in. She also happened to have some more conservative viewpoints as well. I'd wager that there are many of us who aren't totally liberal on every singe issue, also.

But here's where we might do well to listen to her. She is absolutely correct when she talks about what we owe to veterans. We don't have to be pro-war to recognize what soldiers go through and what veterans have gone through to ensure that we have the freedom to sit here at our computers expressing ourselves freely, particularly if it's in disagreement with our leaders and their policies. We may not like the fact that violence and killing have bought us this freedom, God knows I don't, but unfortunately in the real world that's the way it is and always has been. I hate that and you hate that, but it's reality. And that doesn't mean we shouldn't recognize what veterans have suffered on our behalf because of that.

If you doubt that, go and watch the first hour of Saving Private Ryan, think of the Nazis and what they were doing and would have done to us and the rest of the world had they not been stopped and what had to be done in order to stop them, and you'll see exactly what I mean. Think of the Civil War, with all its violence and killing and blood and suffering and horrendous casualties, and think of how it was fought to keep the nation together and to end slavery and think of what would have happened without it. Think of the American Revolution and all of its death and blood and suffering, why it had to be fought, and what would have happened had it not been fought. No one hates war more than I, but we also have to be realistic and recognize that that is how we have gained and maintained our freedom, including that of expressing our disagreements with our government on this message board. We often let our opposition to this particular war in Iraq blind us to that fact, and we need to recognize that. THAT is what she was trying to say.

And we would do well to recognize our own hypocrisy in that we rightfully bash those on the right, including Bush, who trash those veterans who disagree in the slightest with them and who don't toe the party line, as well as their hypocrisy in cutting veterans benefits, forcing the reserves to stay longer or extending their duties, Bush not attending one single military funeral and not allowing the media to photograph the coffins of returning casualties, etc., but guess what? We often do the same thing to those who don't toe OUR line or who don't denounce the Iraqi war. That is also what she was trying to say.

Note that when I say that, I'm not talking about those soldiers accused of or convicted of prisoner abuse or other similar atrocities. This is just something we really need to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well put
vets do deserve what they were promised by the government. They did put their lives on the line for the country. Its not their fault Bush has fucked up this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Vets usually get screwed over by the government
I refer you to the Bonus Army in the 1930s that wound up shot and gassed in Washington, D.C. by General Douglas McArthur and Major George S. Patton. This happened to them because World War I vets were seeking bonus money that the government had promised to them which was urgently needed during the Depression. Rather than pay them off, the government shot a lot of them and burned them out of their tents in Anacostia.

This government is in the habit of using folks and then fucking them over. You can look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
89. Pretty Much. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hector459 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. What happened? What did Vetwife say or post?
Another question: How much do you have to contribute to DU to get your star? I sent in a contribution last week and no star yet, which means I can't use some of the search features of the site. Who do I contact?
Thanks for any help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Vetwife posted a goodbye thread today
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 10:59 PM by missb
She apparently bashed DU in the process, earning herself a tombstone.

There are lots of threads on General Discussion about this. Keep looking through the first few pages to find threads talking about her.

Go to Ask The Administrator's Forum and ask Skinner about your star. It is probably a clerical error. Edited to add: I don't think there is a minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Go to ATA
at the bottom left of the Latest page and inquire there.

that's ask the admins (ATA) forum.

they'll help you find your star :)

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. She's not going after the people who are screwing the
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 10:45 PM by Cleita
vets over, our government. She is going after us. That tells me either she's stupid or out to destroy the community that does question the present government, who are committing the atrocities against the military enlisted person and veterans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. The fact she mischaracterized DU in such an exaggerated way,...
,...was just plain wrong. The fact that she posted such exaggerations on "conservative" sites,...was just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
122. I agree
Cleita. Why couldn't she have just said a goodbye post and had it at that? Why call into a talk show and make a whole "poor is me" type of phone call? You could tell in her voice that was the type of call. It's nice she's trying to help veterans and we all need to do our part to help these poor men/women who are being abused by the Bush administration. But, as I mentioned on the other thread, I HATE IT when someone goes around and says "support the troops! If you don't it's unAmerican!" and then they turn around and bash and make fun of John Kerry who is a true hero! If you've never seen "Going UpRiver" you should. And those stupid purpleheart bandaids was such a disgusting and disgraceful thing. :grr: :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
133. she twisted the words of a few to damnation of the whole
thats a kick in the groin when your already laying on the ground bleeding, thanks Cleita.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Working against this would help vets:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Indeed.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sorry, I don't think 'we' are hypocrites & need to apologize for anything
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 10:42 PM by Bluebear
The collective body of DU has always supported the troops. To imply that we or at least a significant number of us refer to troops as "baby killers" is horrendous. Anyone who feels that way is certainly no regular member of our community that I have ever encountered here.

You say yourself that you are not talking about soldiers who abuse, atrocities, etc. That has been the prevailing attitude for 99% of the posts I have seen.

"Our own hypocrisy"?? It is this group of people that campaigned long and hard for a President who would hopefully support our troops by bringing them home ALIVE.

Speaking of hypocrites, how about instances where people 'bashed' Senator Kerry, his record and medals? Start with them, I just don't see this wholesale "bashing" of troops at DemocraticUnderground.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. True!!! Zero limits policy on Democrat-bashing.
Zero tolerance policy if a few idiots (or very angry people) post something derogatory about individuals serving in the armed forces.

That's pretty hypocritical.

Beyond the scant extreme-type posts (which could not possibly compare to some of the hateful shit right-wingers post), the only posts I ever recall bashing troops involved those responsible for war crimes, and even then posters were being exceptionally well-reasoned in advocating that full responsibility be borne by the freakin' leadership that OBVIOUSLY trickled the "okay" to the individuals involved.

I mean, damn, give me a break!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd just remind you it's the Democrats who put in place and defend
the veteran's benefits programs and

not a day goes by on DU without a thread of sadness and weeping of the news of more killing and maiming of good people (American and Iraqi) suffering in this needless illegal war.

we beg for support and counseling for the troops as they return and for the military families who feel such strain thanks to BushCo and his evil minions

I haven't weighed in on any of the other Vetwife threads since it is her decision to go where she feels drawn, but to say that DU as a whole is anti-military is, IMHO, bullshit of the highest order.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
41. I'm well aware of that,
and I'm very well aware of Republican hypocrisy when it comes to the troops. I wasn't implying at all that Dems are against the troops or anything like that, that wasn't my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. interesting.
thanks for posting those links. I am not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's disturbing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. what is all this about?
Originally Posted by SmoothBelly
I personally wouldn't waste time trying to sign in again, the trolls can't really disrupt. Their posts get deleted and only handful of people see them before they are deleted. It'll only be fun to be a trolling DU mod

Maybe Skinner is a troll, and all the money he collects goes to Bush, I mean, who honestly knows?

Today, 02:26 AM
Skinner
Member


trolls dont do well - master moles like freeper melissa and myself do quite well and our posts are not deleted and our accounts are not ts'd.

Vetwife was not a mole or a troll. She was never part of anything like that at all.

Its all how you do it.

Defending vetwife on DU right now stirs em up, for example.

Thats got enough for a smirk and not a bannable offense IF you have the post count.

post count is EVERYTHING at DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Ah, so is someone running back and forth and giggling about it?
Yeah, working up both conservatives and liberals on an internets board by dropping bombs really will help the tropps. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Have they nothing better to do?
I'm truly puzzled by people like that. Why would people waste their time on games like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. You're confused?
Maybe? :shrug:

Are you from Ohio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
39. she does describe herself as "one of those awful liberals"
but that being said, this about vetwife, she had/has issues beyond the "vet bashing" that goes on here at DU, Obviously she craves the limelight of authority offered at CU that she lacked here at DU, I remember a post from her about a year ago concerning the death of a kitten at the hands of her neighbor..without actually seeing the act she laid the blame directly on her neighbor...no doubt in her mind whatsoever. At the time I thought she was a little dramatic and overemotional. I guess I was right. Too bad though, at times she did post some decent threads but I always approached them a little apprehensively. She'll be back though...not too much action at CU nor the other site...lol she'll be back, DU is the monkey on her back and every addict loves the first hit best!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. dammit Fenris, always flamebaiting......effectively....lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. I am a liberal on that site
and have never hidden that and have often been called on my liberal posts. I am not a troll or a traitor and Jonny, you in particular should damn well know that considering all the time you spent with my son and I during the march on Washington in October of '03.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. What does, "nice work Lisa, Fenris seems to be on to you" mean?
Nice work Lisa....Fenris seems to be on to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #62
67. To be fair to liberalhistorian
any time they see anybody do anything that starts controversy here, they throw their kudoes up.

The person starting a controversial post doesn't even have to be a member there to be praised by the guys. I guess they start jacking off in their mother's basements whenever they see DUers arguing over anything.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #67
93. Yes but if someone posts here as a "dare" I wish they would say so
It would be nice to know a thread is being posted to be watched as entertainment before we respond to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. It was posted as a dare and for their entertainment
Dont let them out lisa - she is one of the more successful infiltraters. I think we should stop talking about it.

TxLib, who cannot even stand to be around them anymore - so we must suffer him excepted


is lisa lib historia aka moonbeam or whatever it was?

Would you fuckers stop changing your fucking names jeez.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. liberalhistorian is a 100% true blue democratic liberal
and I agree, posting a thread on a dare is wrong. That said, she's a good liberal and a good DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #109
119. Her friends at CU are saying that she and JustMe are moles???
Maybe they are making it up. Maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #119
123. They're making it up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #119
127. *lol* Gee. I'm a "target" now. I must be making a difference!!!
Wow. I am actually feeling a bit more confident now.

Thanks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #119
129. They're manipulative bastards
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:18 AM by Goldmund
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #54
101. I don't think posting on conservative sites assumes the poster is
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 11:55 PM by Demonaut
conservative, if that were the case then I've been trolling here at DU since my first post at FreeRepublic a year ago......My ID "Hefalump"





on edit it was a year ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #101
140. I happen to be a liberal
there posting a liberal point of view, I've had my share of being trashed there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #140
142. no........."one of those awful liberals"...lol, no hiding your agenda
I respect that you aren't hiding behind a neutral profile
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Vets Are Cogs in the Vast Machinery of BOTH Just and Unjust Wars
and should be compensated with care and disability cash adequately. However, if they are expressing their rights to political opinions, everybody else has a right to oppose their opinions. On those grounds, their political opinions don't carry more weight because of their service. And if they are political partisans, they ought NOT to use their uniforms and decorations as props for their opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. Be careful. "Level" posts like yours takes the winds out of RW sails!
:hi:

All level-headed people would agree with your poignant position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was how she did it.
She made us ALL seem like a few that said things that weren't right. Why couldn't she have addressed the issue? I just get the feeling that she wanted to leave, she was a mod on the other site not just someone there to participate and help. She betrayed all of us defend and work for the troops. These are our childen and brothers and sisters and hubands and wives and she made it seem like we don't care. It just wasn't right what she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Is that you?
:hi:

Lisa, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. BWHAHAHA!!! LMAO!
Walt, you are too funny!

lol

TWO IN ONE DAY? HOT DAMN

What is going on around here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. It's no secret
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 10:58 PM by Pithlet
to anyone that has ever polluted their monitors by visiting said site. I've gone over a few times after past dramas regarding that site (ETA lurked, never joined), and have vowed never to go back. Quite a lot of them post here also, and are pretty open about it over there. They just can't mention that site here, so it isn't obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
40. Well, hell, ya'll,...it seemed like a secret to me!!!
Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Not really. It's right there in the public
on the internets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. I know. I don't know why
this is an "outing" as it is something I've known about for awhile. In Liberalhistorian's defense, I never saw her post anything conservative or badmouth DU when I saw that she posts there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. I do still trust a "vetting" process AND your post makes me think twice,..
,...about what is happening here.

WTF is happening here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. I'm not sure what you mean
Are you asking about the Vetwife hooha of last night and today? Or about the "site which cannot be named"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #65
76. Neither. I am concerned about becoming a bit "trigger-happy".
"vetwife" mischaracterizing our community and spreading that mischaracterization was totally unacceptable, exclamation mark!

On the other hand, I don't want to drown those who are trying to build bridges.

If that doesn't make sense to you, PM me and we'll have a discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #76
82. i hear you
i thought about registering there and chatting. i saw other du'ers and always they did it in integrity. saw one with issue here, and they were talking it at the other site and this person said no. they werent on that site to bash du. they would deal with their issue in the appropriate way with appropriate people. i admire and respect that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. No, you've clarified it for me.
I don't want to drown anyone here. I hope that isn't how I came across. My point was that it isn't necessarily unknown that there are people who participate both here and at that other site. I don't necessarily think that those who post there automatically have nefarious reasons for being here. The main purpose of the other site is to troll this one and then talk about it, so sparks do fly whenever that subject comes up here, understandably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. and that is true. that is the oddity of the site
one forum is all about pulling post of here and ridiculing and shamefully mouthing and villifying the post. out of context. dissing people. it is sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #87
108. And, your point is very well-taken. Nothing pisses me off more than,...
,...being manipulated or used. NOTHING!!!

I am in this world for everybody. I am a member of one race,...the human race,...and those who are in it for just themselves and who take advantage of all us who SHARE responsibility,...really piss me off!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. In disgusted Oliver Douglas from Green Acres voice: "LISA!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. As a Veteran
you don't owe me a damn thing. You do owe your country your opinion and you have right to scream it from the highest treetops. Never give a blanket to any occupation, NEVER. I'm a wife of a disable cop injured in the line of duty and I read and laugh at the cop bashing and I couldn't care less. You owe my husband nothing either.

I'm sorry but no one is going to place me in a box. I will like and honor who I choose to honor and I will not be dictated too. I am an American after all and my democracy can handle a cranky female veteran. If it can't we are in worst shape that I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:48 PM
Original message
She sure has a funny way of saying it.
I honestly don't know how anyone who is even centrist can stand to post or even lurk at that site which cannot be named, let alone be a mod for it. Badmouth us at that said site. And then come here and announce in a huff that she's leaving because we don't support the troops here at DU. Her accusations in her goodbye post were baseless. It's not too hard to figure out why some here might be a bit baffled, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
63. If she is a mod at 'unsaid' site,
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 11:47 PM by troubleinwinter
and bad-mouthing DU there, and folks here knew about it.... why was she permitted to remain here until she insulted us here today?

No one alerted the mods here? What do I know? I thought she was odd, but was unaware that she was on 'unsaid' site, as I can't stomach those places.

Oh well, here's for her and her ilk:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kerry's a vet yet she sat there and repeated the "bandaid wound" lie
Also, I appreciate that those in the armed forces are willing to fight for our freedoms. But the last time that they were used in that manner was sixty years ago. Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War and now this Iraq War are NOT for our freedoms. To use our troops who signed up to protect this nation in such a false manner is the real disrespect to the troops. And people on DU for the most part understand that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
88. The Kerry slander is what pisses me off
I really don't care about the rest of it. I understand that people who are interested in particular issues have to hold their noses sometimes to get work done--it's just pragmatism. But to repeat the Kerry slander like that, and then to post that pic with Max Cleland, who worked tirelessly to dispel it, is a level of duplicity with which I am not familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #88
146. The obvious bias against Kerry is a dead giveaway. It's a slam dunk
guilty as charged. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
two gun sid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. I notice that you mention no veterans after WWII.
Our military has not been used to protect our freedom in the last 60 years. Our government has hired them out to corporations that profit from war and we pay the bill.

I don't understand how vetwife could be so pissed at a couple of schmucks on a message board dissing the troops. Being called a name never hurt anyone. Especially someone who has seen the violence and destruction of war. That kind of thing tends to toughen a person up. vetwife chose to leave DU because of these so called insults to the troops. Before she left she posted a "I'm takin' my ball and goin' home" thread with a picture tribute to herself.

I could care less where she has been or is posting now. That is her business. My own feeling is she is a narcissist or a grifter looking to make money off of peoples patriotism or guilt. She doesn't speak for me or defend my rights as a veteran. All she wants and ever wanted was attention from people. Let us move on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
74. "All she wants and ever wanted was attention from people"
Well said. And we are giving it to her. You're right, let us move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. You two are in the same pea pod.
Whether there are any points in there is something else altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. No, actually I am a staunch
die-hard liberal and Dem and always will be. That doesn't mean I always have to agree 100% with everything everyone here says and that I can't express myself when I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
57. if all du was bashing vets and not supporting troops then
maybe she did have a point. but it simply is not true. i read her post this morning, and i read these boards all day, i sat in wonder about what bashing of troops, i dont see it. i dont do it. not what i believe. why once again, are democrats being protrayed as not supporting the troops

i suggest to you that democrats support troops above and beyond the republican party, and i bet being a staunch democrat you would be right there with me pointing out all the many ways

i have been on cu and listened to how she talks about du

i listened to her talk as if she was the only christian on this board. a bit offensive.

a couple hecklors and she goes off on everyone.

no, i dont think vetwife was right. and she doesnt get to say we dont support troops. especially all the support i have seen individuals and the group as a whole give to troops and their families.

it isnt like everyone woke up this morning and said hey, lets diss vetwife. lets say the ugliest lies we can think of her. she came on here. she made her statements. she decided who we all are dismissing the facts and actuality of who we are. she is responsible for the chaos, and she alone. she made her choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. AND THAT IS PRECISELY THE POINT!
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amaya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
26. Ah fuck...
hmmmm.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
58. Sorry, that doesn't fly
>>Note that every soldier in Iraq is part of a force that is actively committing atrocities (not all are convicted, mind you), I cannot support any part of such a group. It hurts, but it's true.<<

Anymore than saying the BTK killer in Kansas belinged to a church so the whole church is a "killer".

Anymore than saying a soldier who committed atrocities is American so all Americans are atrocious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. Precisely! IT'S THE FREAKIN' NEOCON'S FAULT!!!
This would NOT be happening if the fucking neoCONspirators and their Rove fascist machine was not working over this country to their power-mongering, profitteering benefit!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #58
81. Sorry, it does
Every soldier in Iraq is part of that force, as they are actively contributing towards its actions. It is not right nor is it excusable to aid such a despicable effort. In this way, the soldiers of the US military are helping the war and oppression of Iraq, and therefore I cannot support any of them until they oppose it or as long as this continues.

I really don't know anything about the BTK killer to be honest with you. That being said, the members of that church did not help the killer, they did not fight for the killings, and they did not have a part in carrying it out.

I never said every American (or even US soldier) is "atrocious", but merely that since the actions of US soldiers contribute to the atrocities in Iraq and around the world, I will not support any part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #81
98. It's your fault by association. We're all connected. We're all at fault.
Let's remove responsibility from the neoCONfuckers and place it squarely where it belongs,...on us!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #98
107. It is our choice to oppose what wrongs our government commits
If we choose to fulfill that obligation, then we are doing something that is truly right and necessary. I have not done all that I can, and I am responsible for that. The causes we fight for are ours to decide (sometimes the cause chooses the individual) and ours to complete. The responsibility of the US' actions is not completely on us, but the responsibility of opposing it IS ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #107
120. To the VAST majority of human beings, "freedom" is doing the best you can
with what you get. It's not like we all have some kind of smorgasbord (sp?) of choices. We do the best we can with what we have.

Those on the "top" tower over us as if we are mere suds while advantaging themselves of our souls.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #120
126. I think that although
it may seem as though there is little hope for most people, there is so much more potential in all of us. To think of someone on "the top" is purely the perspective of society, as everything is fundamentally the same, and therefore every person is ultimately equal. I believe that no amount of riches or power can make anyone better or actually any more wealthy or powerful than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #126
130. Yep. But, we still have to live what is while pursuing what can be. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. "No such user registered"
It must be a broken link ,who was it jonnyblitz?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. I don't know, they are copying & pasting links from here though!
I'm confused!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Yes, it is
:shrug:

I can understand it. It's a site whose existance was formed on disrupting DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Links to that site are not allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. didn't know that.
sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. OH! Sorry, I didn't realize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
85. I guess only links to some RW sites are allowed while others are not.
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 11:44 PM by Just Me
'cause I see links to RW sites posted here everyday.

:shrug:

I wonder if this post of mine will be deleted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. I don't think it was.
I can't quite recall who it was, but I'm certain it wasn't him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
35. Hello, any further dialogue coming?
I think you raised some interesting points for discussion, are you going to respond? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
36. Nothing to do with hating war. Your comparison to WWII is obscene.
I had two uncles in WWII who came home and my grandfather's brother was shot down over Belgium. No one in the family ever talked about it, they just did what they had to do.

I'm getting really sick of the whining from the military families in this country about so-called "support." Perhaps their problem is that they know that this is no WWII so they are trying to make it into one by bullying and carping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
42. Give me a break.
VW telling us that we're losing elections because we're anti-troops is slander against the party. I defy you or anyone to show me exactly what the Democratic party has done to deserve this label. Democrats have been generals and soldiers and led the country through wars. WHY ARE WE EVEN HAVING TO DEFEND OURSELVES ON THIS ISSUE?

This is getting so f-ing ridiculous it makes me sick. Through vicious libel and smear campaigns by the neo-cons backed up by their loyal parrots, the right have claimed self defense, patriotism, family, morality, troops, and god for themselves and made liberals out to be anti-all of those things. It's disgusting.

There have been posts on this site that I haven't liked. I don't care for posts that are anti-police that use one-liners like "cops are assholes" as their arguments. You know what I do? I put them on ignore and focus on the MAJORITY of the posts that aren't like that. I don't go starting a thread titled "I'M LEAVING DU BECAUSE THE ANTI-POLICE THREADS ARE JUST TOO MUCH TO BEAR" making it *appear* as though it's a real problem. Furthermore, it brands the whole group as being that way, which would be a slanderous, insulting lie. VW's smear-post was a slanderous and insulting and I don't give a flying fuck what she's done for vets. I donate to vets, both my parents are vets, i've got a relative in Iraq right now and one that recently returned.

If the right wants to take issues up with the Democrats, then why don't they ever take up issues that counter what the Democrats REALLY AND ACTUALLY believe, instead of accusing us of believing this or that lie and making us defend ourselves. It's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. Thank you. Liberals and Democrats are the TRUE supporters of Veterans
While Republicans can only talk the talk but when it comes time to pay for the programs, they fail to walk the walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:18 PM
Original message
I agree bling bling! well said
DEMOCRATS are the ones who supported a candidate that was OPPOSED to CUTTING VA BENEFITS.

There is a difference between parroting nationalistic propaganda and supporting the troops. The latter being one that includes honest discussion about the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
77. Give bling bling a drink and put it on my tab!
:toast: Well said, madame. Well said indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #42
103. Thanks Bling Bling n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
134. Me, too!!! I am SICK of the RW just making shit up as they go along.
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:27 AM by Just Me
And who the hell are they who advance only themselves? WHO??? What makes them so great that they can advantage themselves on the backs of the rest of humanity? WHAT?

I see extremists, I see hatred, I see division, I see poverty, I see anger, I see "danger" (all around us), I see judgmentalism, I see predatory barbarianism "EXPLAINED", I see public wealth disappearing into an opaque hole, I see deception, I see destruction, I see desparation.

This leadership is fully responsible for all that!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
60. Missed the whole thing. Think Dems should have bumber stickers
on their cars that say - Vets: you fought for us there, we'll fight for you here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. I'd put that on my car
along with my two "Support the Troops" ribbons, my "Proud American" ribbon, my "FW" oval sticker, my "Don't blame me, I live in a BLUE STATE" sticker, and my "Liar liar, oil well's on fire" sticker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coreystone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #64
86. Support our American Work Force! Most of those stickers are .....
MADE IN CHINA! Perhaps not yours, but about 60% of them are!!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. you fought for us there, we'll fight for you here!
i like but only you and i will get we are saying fighting for them against bushco. a second flash was the right will be thinking they mean fighting for vets against the anti troop dems, lol lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
61. Do you think today's generation would not step up in similar circumsta
circumstances? It's not as if they had a choice and wat they fought for has been betrayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
66. Just a point of reference here
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 11:34 PM by DancingBear
I'm coming in on the end of this thing, so I'd rather not get too deeply involved since I am not in full command of the facts, but in liberalhistorian's defense:

i recall meeting here and her son at a big D.C. anti-war rally last year. I recall she drove all the way from Ohio to participate, and (for me, anyway) that cuts some slack re: this issue. I believe her when she states who she is, and what she stands for.

Agree or disagree with her position, I just think she is a member here in good standing. I'll be the first to anoint myself the fool if I'm wrong, As always, if anyone has evidence to the contrary I'm (as Ross said) all ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. I don't know...
Look at my post on the other thread, by their words you shall know them.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3184152&mesg_id=3185680
To be honest, I don't really care what someone's politics are, but the fact that she would be associated(Married) to someone like that, or make up a story like that, makes me think its best she does join the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #72
84. Solon, I'm speaking of liberalhistorian here
not vetwife. From what I have been able to uncover (pardon the pun) about vetwife I have no qualms at all (at this point) about her true intentions - they seem to lie on the wrong side.

That said, I was just commenting about lh and her take on veterans, war, et al.

Sorry if I was unclear - too late at night for us old guys... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #84
116. Sorry about that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. Thank you, DB, I just
told Jonny that in another post because my son and I spent time with him at the march as well. I am a staunch, die-hard liberal and always will be. I just think we need to temper our anti-war stance with the recognition of just how much we owe vets and of what they suffer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #75
90. my gosh i feel for the soldiers.
i happen to be one that has empathy for those that are placed in the situation of not having the leadership to be able to refuse the orders of torture. i have empathy for all the soldiers over there and their families here. i feel their pain and fear. that is the absudity in it. that is the constant irritant of being told because i am democrat i do not care. i dont know a single democrat, peace advocate that doesnt have love for fellow man, and that includes all the soldiers. the difference, in the love of fellow man, it also includes the over 100k innocent men women and children. i cannot make them less too. if i cannot make those that tortured less or those that did horrific things over there, why oh why could i make the innocent life less too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #75
91. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #75
92. Gee, I hardly remember jonny
He didn't stand out at all... :)

:hi: JB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #92
135. LOL...
well I remember YOU. yeah i blend. :P :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
100. oh I dont question how you define yourself
but I wouldnt know where to begin in regards to the cumultive "issues" I have with you so I won't. I am finding your posts in the "other" forum amusing though. Quite the different tone you take in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #100
113. Jonny, the issues you have with
me are that I don't agree with you in every single thing 100%. I respect your right to have your views, please respect mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
102. But, we do.
Sure, there have been some posts that don't, but it's hardly fair to blanket the whole of DU. I do think that overall this website DOES recognize how much we owe vets. A lot of the people here ARE vets, and a good deal more are friends and loved ones of vets. When people here have lost loved ones to this God forsaking war, there was a ton of support from DU. Smearing DU as troop hating is baseless, and hurt many who post here. I think what Vetwife did was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
78. dancing bear i am with you and thank you for your post
i trust liberal historian as far as i trust anyone on the net. and cool you met her in person and nifty her son was participating with her. i think that is just cool. i for one am not questioning liberalhistorian. nor do i have animosity to vetwife. i am just done with people bashing dems all the time in falsehood
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
79. Yup, Liberalhistorian is a TRUE BLUE liberal, 100% agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
68. The last time our freedom was threatened as a nation...
Was in the war of 1812, the last time we were invaded by a foriegn nation. The last time our country was in dire peril was the Civil War, so I would thank a vet of that war, on the Union side, for keeping the country intact. Since then? Mostly wars of imperialism or defending allies, usually begrudgely, so in those cases, I wouldn't necessarily thank them, they did a job they were called to do, and in that case they should be taken care of through VA benefits and such because we owe them for putting themselves in harm's way in that case. Beyond that, we owe them nothing, its may sound cold, but to say something like "Thank a Vet if you like your freedom!" is both dishonest and wrong.

Even during WW2 we sided with an adamate Imperialist and a homicidal maniac to kill another homicidal maniac, and ended up with the Cold War. At worst, if Pearl Harbor didn't happen, we never would have participated, and a slightly different cold war would have happened, between 4 major world powers rather 2. To entertain any thoughts that either Germany or Japan could have invaded our country is stupid. Hell, if any veteran of the modern era is to be thanked for our freedom, it would be a little known Marine Commandant who hated war at the end, became a Socialist, and also prevented Fascist traitors to democracy from overthrowing the American government. So to Smedley Butler, I thank you for your service after retirement, you alone did more than all the vets since then in preserving our democracy.

Do I hate the troops? No I do not, they are being used in another imperialist war by yet another imperialist president. I do not like the fact that anyone is to die for an elective war, personally I believe that if we are to project our power in this manner anywhere, it is to prevent imminent genocide of another people, or in peacekeeping. Beyond that, we should simply protect our borders and that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. I REALLY disagree
I sincerely believe our freedom was threatened by the Axis powers during WWII. Both the Japanese and the Germans were working on nuclear weapons and one or both would have developed them had the United States not joined the war. With such an imbalance in global power by one or both of those empires having that awesom power, the United States would have one of two choices. Either capitulate, or become a vast molten slag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #71
80. Germany was not nearly as close as the United States at the time...
Remember, Germany had the "brain drain" that Hitler caused with the stupid Anti-Jewish laws. Also, while Japan was kicking everyone's rear all the way up to when we joined the war. Hitler's advance into Soviet territory would have stalled and turned back, in fact, if Stalin really got his act together, he would have marched into Berlin by himself. Who knows, its all conjecture anyways. I will say this however, the Manhattan project would have arrived, either on schedule or maybe a year or two behind our timeline, but both Germany's and Japan's would have been even further behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. They were close enough
that if they did not have the resource drain of having to combat the United States, they would have developed the weapon.

Had we never been forced into that war (remember, we were attacked by the Japanese and the Germans declared war on us before we declared war on them), we would have never put the resources towards development of the weapon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #83
104. You think Roosevelt wouldn't have thought that far ahead?
You were right about the turn of event that lead us into WW2, hence the "begrudgely" part of my first post in the thread. We never would have even entered the war, no matter how much Roosevelt wanted to, in Europe, if Hitler didn't declare war. Also, at the time, even with all his power, Hitler would have still had difficulty with the war in the East, Britian would have still hurt him, and Japan would be too busy trying to conquer India to even devote as much resources as they could into the development of an atomic weapon, a theoratical weapon with dubious benefit at the time. Even in their most desparate times, Hitler still had more faith in the many off the wall schemes that the Germans were experimenting with, like Jet engines and such. We would still have been unscathed by the war, and the United States would have still had time to go forward with the Manhattan project and other things. The only difference would be we wouldn't have turned so many factories into war machine production and things like that.

Even by the end of the war, if we didn't participate at all, we would have still have preeminent Manufacturing power, as well as two oceans between us and the enemy. Even if they developed nuclear weapons first, they were still many years away from developing ballistic missles to actually make them reach our shores. Would it have happened? Most likely, but even then we would have caught up very quickly, and then MAD would kick in just as surely as it did between us and the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #104
121. The Manhattan project received the attention it got
only because were were actively engaged in a war. If not, it would not have received even 10% of the resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #80
96. I have to disagree here.
Germany and the Axis powers were, indeed, a threat to us as well as Europe and many parts of the world. We're looking back on it now through the hindsight of more than sixty years, but there was no guarantee at all that we'd win.

At the time we entered WWII, the Allies were actually losing and it looked pretty grim. You'd better believe that Hitler, Germany and the Axis powers would have definitely been a major threat to us. It was perhaps one of the greatest threats we'd faced as a nation up to that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #96
112. So was the USSR after WW2...
That's my point, one of our very allies during that war became our greatest threat. Oddly enough, they ended up reforming themselves out of that threat. I never said they wouldn't have been a threat AFTER the war, but they had no real designs on us up to that point, with the exception of Japan knocking us out of the Pacific, as they thought they would, with Pearl Harbor. As we all know, that didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #112
117. To be honest, Stalin was a threat to us before WWII
and was only an ally of convenience because Hitler was a numnutted idiot when it came to military strategy. Starting a two front war was moronic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #117
128. That much is true....
I have no clue as to what Hitler was smoking at the time he thought that up, and even then, he bit off more than he could chew. I strongly doubt, either with our help or not, if Stalin wouldn't have been able to fend him off eventually. Also to the remark on the resources dedicated to the Manhattan project, you are most likely correct, however, even before we entered the war, we were still ahead of either Germany or Japan at the time, I doubt that would have changed anytime soon, Pearl Harbor or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe_in_Sydney Donating Member (160 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #96
143. As an anti-war Australian
I have to say I think the US entering WWII was a good thing. Someone mentioned upthread that Japan would've had its hands full conquering India -- maybe. But what makes you think India would've been next in line?

The Japanese were moving south through Asia and had reached Papua New Guinea just to the north of Australia. Australia was underpopulated, resource rich (including in uranium) and under-defended. Almost all of Australia's military forces were in Europe or Africa fighting the Germans.

If the Japanese had taken Australia they would've been in a strong position re south-east Asia and the Pacific. I don't think America could've remained unaffected ultimately if they'd stayed out of the war.

Unfortunately the WWII efforts seemed to give the US a bit of a "world saviour" complex, and I agree there's been a lot of military meddling since that was unrequired -- but I think they had to enter that war. Unbridled aggression, such as was being shown by the Germans and Japanese was wrong and deserved to be countered rather than rewarded.

Sadly, the US has now become an international aggressor itself. But I don't think you should throw the baby out with the bathwater by questioning the need for US involvement in WWII.

As much as I'm anti-war, I believe there are times when wars are unavoidable. The worry is fighting them for profit rather than principle.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #143
148. No offense to national pride or anything...
but I would have mentioned Australia but I thought it would have been good to mention the toughest nut to crack in the region that they would go after, after conquering Australia. Please don't take offense at that, its not like I think they were right with the whole Easter Co-Prosperity Sphere and all that BS. Just that, for the very reasons you mentioned, as long as they were able to secure rubber and oil, mostly from the Dutch East Indies, then Australia wouldn't have stood a chance.

Hell if the Japanese actually thought it through, they could have conquered Hawaii as well, instead of a hit and run. If they did that, do you really think the U.S. could have done any type of counter strike anytime soon? Hell no they wouldn't, and cities like San Francisco and LA would have had to worry about air raids all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
94. Nope. And neither do you Moonbeam
Edited on Sat Feb-26-05 11:50 PM by Tinoire
Though I'm not surprised; after all you wanted everyone to stay home when the boy King was being recrowned saying we "will only look ridiculous and marginalized if we protest this inauguration". Why it's not a good idea to protest the inauguration on Thursday

Please. And double please for this - (war) "is how we have gained and maintained our freedom". You have a strange view of freedom. What freedom? What war ever brought anyone here "freedom"? The Revolutionary war is as close as you can get and that only brought a bunch of white men freedom from a bunch of other white men- it didn't bring "freedom" to millions of Indigenous Americans or the millions of African slaves who made it to these "free" shores in their shackles, or to the many more millions who were tossed from the slave ships during a 200 year slave trade.

Fuck that shit. I'm a veteran and I don't care at ALL for the histrionic glorification of this fake red, white and blue apple pie. But then again, I don't have a single issue in common with that scum on those RW boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #94
105. and the last thing I would do is go over there to complain about
DU. fucking sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #94
110. Oh, I don't know, Tinoire, how about
a little thing called WWII where we'd be speaking German and under the thumb of the Nazis right now if it weren't for us, along with the allies, managing to defeat them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #110
114. Even the French in that case wouldn't have been speaking German...
Even under the thumb of the Nazis they still would have been speaking the same language they were speaking before. That's a stupid comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #110
124. We'd be speaking German? Lol.
Not only had the Russians and the French already done most of the hard work when the US finally decided to stop being so chummy with the Germans and mosie on over there but the Germans, last time I checked, were NOWHERE near American soil. You really, really need to read a good history book. I'd recommend starting with like Zinn & Chomsky but throw in some Malcolm X & Ward Churchill to really round it out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #94
111. Oh, I don't know, Tinoire, how about
a little thing called WWII where we'd be speaking German and under the thumb of the Nazis right now if it weren't for us, along with the allies, managing to defeat them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #111
115. Every war since 1945 has been about imperialism
and that's a fact. Our freedoms were not under attack in any war since WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #111
118. Is this like we would all be speaking Arabic had we not invaded Iraq?
Do you think the Germans would have made us all learn German? Really? Do you think no one here had people like my father who served in WWII?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #118
144. No, that's a ridiculous
comparison. And I was being metaphorical in that post, I was trying to point out that we were in real danger from Nazi Germany and the Axis powers and that it was vital that they be stopped.

And you know I believe that the invasion of Iraq was wrong, that they had nothing to do with 9/11, no links to Al-Queda, and no WMD's, they were no danger to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #144
147. Whatever. I don't know how ridiculous the comparison is
I don't know much around here after today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #111
137. Whoops. A "blip" in the matrix.
:bounce:

What?

WHAT?

It's bedtime for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Longhorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
97. I have freqently posted that my son is a Marine.
And all I have ever received from the members of this site are expressions of support and gratitude for his service. I've read some posts occasionally that rankled me but I've read posts that rankle me on a variety of topics -- obviously, not enough to run me off as I still practically live here!

I'm sorry to hear about the situation with Vetwife as she was always helpful and supportive of me when I discussed my son's moral crises as he tries to reconcile his service with his anti-Iraq war views. However, from what I've read about the situation, I trust the judgment of the Admins and moderators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-26-05 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
106. Personally
I think she's had something else happen to bring her down, she knows just as well as I do that dems & progressives do not loathe the military, it is nothing more than another social program, as far as I'm concerned.

I check this board everyday, and I can count the number of anti vet/soldier thread on one hand.

We are a diverse community here: if she can't accept that, then she cannot accept democracy---IMHO.

I do not agree 100% with all the opinions that are discussed here, but that is the beauty of democracy.

I wish her well, but she has given up too easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
125. Sorry, but I do not trust anyone who posts
on CONservative forums.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #125
139. And I happen to post as a LIBERAL
giving the LIBERAL point of view. I didn't realize that DUers weren't allowed to post anywhere else, even if it's to give the liberal point of view on a conservative site. I've had my share of drubbing there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #139
150. Of course you can post anywhere
But acting on their "dares" to stir things up here can make people suspicious of motives. They used you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #139
151. No one said it wasn't allowed.
I've read your posts there, and you give the Liberal point of view.

I say, why bother?

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #139
152. Do you mind saying what your username there was/is? I am curious
to see how "dissenting opinion" is handled there since it sounds like you are a member in good standing and not banned there.

It isn't "liberalhistorian" is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
131. Sure she did. Her point was missing a few facts though
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 12:19 AM by nothingshocksmeanymo
First of all, I don't believe she was a troll. She genuinely believed in a lot of the issues we believe in. She also happened to have some more conservative viewpoints as well. I'd wager that there are many of us who aren't totally liberal on every singe issue, also.

I have no doubt she was sincere when she came. I have read posts that state she had had a hard time, but I have also watched her particpate on sites where people train others in the art of moling DU such as making inflammatory statements.

Therefore, she gives witness daily to deliberate attempts to take even those things that might ALREADY embarrass this board and make them worse.

She complains about a situation here, then enables it by her tacit participation with those who do it even if she may never have publically condoned them.


She also forgets that SOME of the people who post their alleged venom for the military on this site ARE disabled veterans such as several long time posters in LBN who served in Viet Nam. They have a right to their sentiments and they sacrificed as much as anyone - even her.



I never had a confrontation with her nor treated her poorly. I think it's a shame she often speaks of this site poorly when so many DU'ers did and still do support her.

Did she forget THEY are DU, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gemini Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
132. Troll or not I don't f*cking care now.
I did at one point respect her. Oh well.

I have on very rare occasions witnessed a little bashing of various troops here. Big fucking deal. Those posters generally were found later to be the work of disruptor's. Thankfully I didn't tell the disruptors exactly where to fuck off at or otherwise I would have been banned.

As far as the troops are concerned, I have seen countless postings on supporting the troops, on sending them care packages, how to send the packages, and so on. I have seen many posts telling of children, husbands, wives, cousins, nephews, nieces and/or neighbours being sucked up into bushs' hell hole and I have seen the countless supportive replies given to the posters. So who is bashing who and who is helping/supporting who? From where I sit, I see many people at DU putting action into their words by ACTUALLY supporting the troops.





Of course not all people think the same about all things political.
There may be a couple of things I'm not as liberal on as others. I suppose I can be reasoned with. So can most people on this site.



Yes, we do owe the vets. From what I've seen we are the ones fighting for the vets and caring about the vets, unlike the repubs who would rather let them eat day old roach encrusted cake while living in a card board box outside the whitehouse. I'm sure the vets would rather have decent health care and homes and other support than be shoved outside like yesterdays rubbish!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
136. Oh for the love of Pete!
The woman was a selfpromoter and professional "Vet-Wife". Just look at all the selfserving cheesy pictures of herself enveloping anyone standing next to her.
Good riddance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
138. This "Vetwife" accomplished one thing:
She's made alot of people alot less likely to donate to causes like hers in the future, out of fear that they're being being played for suckers. That's a rather dubious accomplishment.

Frankly, I think this woman is getting far too much attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #138
141. What is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
145. claiming to support vets
and simultaneously supporting the bushgang is delusional

either that or shw is a liar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
149. I don't support our soldiers in Iraq or anywhere today.
I feel sorry for them. I wish that they weren't where they are. But I don't support them, or what they are doing.

I would have supported the men and women who fought in WWII, because I think that Hitler would have taken over the world, were it not for them, and then we wouldn't be free to sit at our keyboards and write what we want. I would have supported the revolutionary soldiers, as well, had I lived during that time.

But I have no support for the guys and gals in Iraq today. I hope they live long lives and don't get shot up over there, but I think that they should not be there, period.

I do realize that they wouldn't be there if it weren't for the idiot GWB, but at the same time, I think that they also had a hand in where they are, by not refusing to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #149
153. It is easy to have courage when you have no skin in the game
When Senators and Representatives do not have the courage to challenge the administration on their lies about WMD, Plamegate, voting fraud, Social Security destruction, and the rest of the right wing agenda because they are afraid of being called "liberal", how can one expect an 18 year old soldier to refuse a direct military order and face imprisonment, court martial, or possibly execution?

My generation faced this exact problem during Viet Nam. If you were drafted, you either went, went to jail, or left the country. A very small percentage chose the last two options. It is easy to say intellectually "I would have gone to Canada". It is another thing entirely to have lived through the decision and actually weighed the consequences.

I grew up knowing that I would be drafted. I was very torn about the war, and I felt it was wrong, but I could not visualize leaving the country because I had no money, or any percieved means of doing that, and I was not interested in spending time in jail. I got a reprieve from my death sentence when my lottery number came up 354, and I knew I would not have to face the decision for real. But I know that had my number come up such that I would have had to go, I would have. At 18 years old, did not have the financial means to avoid a fate so distateful, unlike Bush. I also did not have years of reading and thinking experience behind me to judge the morality of what my country would have forced me to do.

30 years later, I view it as a mistake to judge those that are herded into the miltary and compelled through force to exert the will of the leadership. I think you can hold them accountable when they commit war crimes, but they are not responsible for the strategy and decisions made by the civilian and military leadership. They are virtual prisoners to the demands placed on them. We need to hold leadership accountable, not soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
154. Locking
These threads have gotten out of control. This is now a private matter between the admins and the banned member. If anyone has questions or comments, they can post in the Ask the Admins forum.

Thanks for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC