Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gannon Thread #1000. :-)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:13 PM
Original message
Gannon Thread #1000. :-)
You know what guys? I don't think Gannon was an escort and I also believe that he isn't even gay. He was just some guy that thought so much of himself that he wanted to show off his body. So he get in contact with people to advertise his body without actually selling his services in the process making a few extra bucks. Although the MSM hasn't talked much about Gannon, a few media outlets have. So how come no one person has come forward saying they hired Gannon for his services? The few times Gannon has been on tv, he has shown us how arrogant and cocky he is. I could see a guy like that advertising his goodies on the net for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh... um... What was the question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What was the answer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. How come nobody has admitted to being a john?
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:19 PM by BuyingThyme
I could only guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. i disagree, a lot
i don't know if he actually is gay, which really doesn't matter, and i do think he was 'hired' for his services at some point or another.

who in the world would come forward and say "yes, i hired Gannon for a night?" Seriously, who would say that? they would be getting themselves in trouble.

i also don't think he comes off as cocky and arrogant, but emotionless and scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yeah, the scared part I could see too.
But if you think about it, no one really have any proof that he sold his services. And I think we should discontinue calling him a whore/hooker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. how bout an inexperienced PRESSTITUTE?
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:45 PM by bpilgrim
:shrug:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. The guy had a price sheet.
$200/hr -$1200 weekend.
He suggested places to take him, things to do.
He was an escort...hooker...prostitute...booty-buddy, you know, a whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Puhleeze..
"we should discontinue calling him a whore/hooker" WHY? He advertised himself and marketed himself as such. HE posted testimony from his supposed satisfied customers.

If the testimonies were bogus, he is a LIAR and should come out and say as much.

While I don't know if he is gay or not, HE is the one to have given a public online profile, offering his homosexual prostitution service for hire.

"no one really have any proof that he sold his services"... well, look at the ads, the testimonies of his clientelle... and if it walks like a fuckin duck... Huh? What? I shouldn't believe my lyin eyes? Why not?

He is a proven LIAR. And a plagiarist. He doesn't even claim that he wasn't a hooker. Even if he did, there'd be no reason for me to take him at 'his word'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. ?????
gannon isn`t gay..ok if you say so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Just my opinion.....for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. i guess you missed reading all of his web sites and how he was rated by
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:27 PM by flyarm
by some of his johns!!
in fact one high military type!! keep reading!! you are bound to find it!!
and its pretty graphic!!

i think you are way off base..but keep reading..

may i suggest you start here!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3144209&mesg_id=3144209

and then move on to here!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3155132&mesg_id=3155132

thats just for starters!!


fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I read some of those letters, but that's still isn't proof.
Edited on Sun Feb-27-05 10:42 PM by cat_girl25
For all we know, Gannon and his co-partners may have written them. Btw, I am a participant in those two threads that you provided. I don't know what that has to do with my thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. "I don't know what that has to do with my thread"
coming off as ignorant to the known facts and wild speculation in face of the known facts probably has something to do with it :shrug:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. lmao...yeah, the term 'top' is not in heterosexual vocab. -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. That doesn't mean he didn't do his homework.
He more than likely chatted with gay friends to get the "in" thing to say and do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
50. uhh huh ... sure!!
yeah right!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
52. The term "top" is certainly in the heterosexual vocabulary
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 02:46 AM by Ms. Clio
When the hets are playing S&M games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Un, hiring somebody with a military fetish
who said he was a top, only, and who hinted very strongly at being into rough trade is not something anyone would ever want anyone else to know.

He's exactly the type a closeted, self loathing gay would hire, a macho type who would convince him there was nothing "womanish" about it.

Those guys aren't about to set one toe outside the closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. going with your gut, eh?
you provide 0 evidence nor any conjecture that makes any sense.

do you think we should drop it now?

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Oh heck no. This is just someting I've thought about over the weekend.
Who knows, maybe next week I'll have a different view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. kewl
progressives are known for keeping open minds ;->

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Dude, didn't you see his new book?
:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Smirk!
Just love that pic, SwampRat. I chuckle everytime I see it.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. lol
though i don't think sponge bob would ever hang with that creep.

dude, you gotta add that do your online gallery :bounce:
http://news.globalfreepress.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=4

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. How do I get more storage than just 4 photos?
Also, will I get kicked off of that website for anti-Bush stuff like this, for example:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. you should be able to upload as many as you want...
and since it is my site you will never get booted for anti bush images ;->

if you get an error MSG please copy-n-paste the error into a DU MSG for me and i will fix it.

:hi:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I PMed you this message:
"Disk quota exceeded

You have a space quota of 1024K, your files currently use 968K, adding this file would make you exceed your quota."

My pics are normally between about 150-200k apiece (after I've reduced them). If I reduce them more they will look bad. For now, I will dump one or two so I can upload the Gannon pic. :)

Thanks bpilgrim.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. great additions, thanks!
FYI - all du'ers can post images here -> http://images.GlobalFreePress.com

first create an account...
http://news.globalfreepress.com/gallery/register.php

then upload at will ;->

this way we can have a permanent archive to refer back to and post their image urls in your favorite blogs to remind folks that the neoCONs have no mandate.

don't forget to vote for your favorite images as well =)

if you have any problems ping me at DU.

psst... pass the word :bounce:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. ROTFL!!!!!!!
Oh man this is funny! But look at that six pack! I wonder if he still has it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. If he does, it's probably in the fridge. n/t
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babel_17 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. My guess
is that most of Gannon's clientele are in the closet and with families.

The money involved implies they have careers. Careers that could be ruined in any number of ways.

A divorce lawyer could have a lot of fun with the story if the person was married.

Custody issues if divorced.

Security clearances if in military or gov't.

Admitting to wanting the services Gannon seems to have specialized in would probably carry an extra onus.

The activity was illegal.

Call me cynical but I think right wing blowhards with access to a TV camera and/or a microphone might think the "outer" was fair game.

They have been known to be less than gentle.

Should any seriousness be given to their claims they could expect a real physical disruption to their lives by way of the press at their door etc.

Afaik most gays who engage in closeted affairs don't take outing each other lightly.

Yes, Gannon's hypocrisy could be a factor in that but a person with principles could still be loathe to out someone.



And last but not least, not everyone remembers the faces of prostitutes they hire.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. "...not everyone remembers the faces of prostitutes they hire."
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 12:13 AM by cat_girl25
That is true.

I was going to post you a link to a thread that I had a conversation with someone from this early morning but it looks like that whole thread was deleted. That conversation was one of the reasons I now believe that he wasn't an escort. This blogger had contacted one of Gannon's web partners. Now I wished I printed the thread.

Oh well, back to the drawing board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. "That conversation was one of the reasons I now believe that he wasn't an
escort".

Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-27-05 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. We're going to ride Gannon's hairy ass up to the front door of the WH.
Fasten your seat belts gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. i sure hope so!!
i am sick of these wh pigs getting away with all the lies and to go this far at propaganda is to spit on the security that those of us with the airlines have had to deal with and the sham of security needs to be exposed , even if it has to start at the wh!!
no one at this wh has been accountable for anything.,,not even the deaths of my co-workers or the innocent lives of 9/11..these pigs have all walked scott free, and the media has been their greatest accomplices!
i am sick of it!!

and i am sick of the propaganda!!
i want them held accountable..no matter how high it goes..and it goes to the top!
they are all filthy liars!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
28. hey there
I'm the one you had the convo with.

What I said was that while there is no PROOF Jim/Jeff was a hooker or gay, there is PROOF he was an Internet pornographer. He sold gay porn on the web via an affiliate/sponsor program.

I suggested that we re-frame Jim/Jeff as an Internet pornographer because he was and I have PROOF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Though we don't have "PROOF"
that he was a hooker... we know that he advertised himself and posted VERY graphic "testimonies" from his "clients". Maybe not "proof", but apparent evidence.

YOU may have "PROOF" that he sold pornography, WE do not. Wanna show it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. read my blog
http://blogslut.com

the Feb 21 entry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. Help me understand:
His "prostution ads" and "client testimonials" may or may not be fantasy, but what he WAS selling was subscription $$ access to online pornographic pictures??? Do I have it correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. correct
Look, I'm not saying Jim/Jeff WASN'T a gay escort.

The thing is, these pages with price lists and client testimonials are not proof. I would be thrilled if we could find proof that the man was a hooker. I would be ecstatic if there were evidence of a clentele.

At the moment, his being and Internet pornographer is a solid fact. Guckert used his image and websites to sell memberships to a gay porn site.

The rethugs are doing the rove/reverse psychology thing and making it look as if the left are hypocritical in their support of gays.

We can turn this around and call Guckert something that is incontrovertibly true

Jeff Gannon: Internet Porographer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. OK. Thanks for the clarification... got it!
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 02:15 PM by troubleinwinter
The gay angle only points to the hypocrisy of the right, but I see your point about it being turned around on us.

Hmmmm... now prostitution IS illegal.

Pornography isn't. So attacking JG as a pornographer only supports Gonzales' efforts, so we are stuck in a dilemma. His being a pornographer is a proven fact, but that is not illegal, nor would we want to help the AG make it so.

Gay / prostitution / pornography all seem unimportant, except that prostitution is illegal, as is non-payment of taxes. The real story is the connection between Gannon/Bobby Eberle and Rove/McClellan/Fleischer. Connection between Eberle and Rove is another proven fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #40
51. yes and i read every bit of the "JOHN" reports about gannon...
i need no more proof than that , and that was on gannons site...one from a military "john"..i do not have to read it more than once to "get it!"
whats not to get??

well * may get a good case offff...oh never mind!! use your imagination!!

May be * can now get a purple heart..for schtupping a m4m military hooker!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Hi there,
I was hoping you'd be back.:hi: And yeah, I remember what you said but after talking to you I kinda agreed with my previous assertion that he may not be a hooker. It's what I thought early on but never said anything about it. And I know you have the proof, I read thru your blog. I was going to link it but didn't know if it was okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. hi back :)
i went ahead and put the link in here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. He's gay and he's a whore.
Most men who use gay prostitutes are closeted, so no one is going to come forward, especially since he specialized in military fantasies.

There was no "make a few extra bucks" from his websites. Most of his listings were on free services. The one that required an AdultCheck ID may have given him a portion of that fee, but that's it from the web.

Also, the Blade has pictures of him at a gay party that "always turns into an orgy...". One of the pictures has him in a sexual situation.


http://washingtonblade.com/2005/2-18/news/national/reporter.cfm

The story isn't over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. he was an affiliate
of malecorps.com. he sold memberships to their site via his USMCPT page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. cat_girl25
I bookmarked this thread if you ever need to refer to it again. Sorry about the other thread. I think it just fell off.

Guckert sold gay porn on the web. This is a fact. For proof, see my blog. It's in my profile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. Yeah, we can bookmark this thread and then maybe later
after you get your post count up, you can start a thread and keep us up to date on your findings. The other thread didn't fall off, they should stay in archive for a while but what happened was probably the original poster was tombstoned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. I wish I still had the link.
But a few years ago, I was checking out some various gay/porn realted yahoo groups and I came across Gannon's yahoo ID. Why I remember it you ask? His picture on his profile was HOT, but he had a link to his "conservative guy.com" website also on his profile.

This guy is gay. This guy is a whore. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. where is your proof?
Until you can find it, the web pornographer thing is the one thing we know he is.

I'm in the Internet porn business and I hate to break it to you but it's ALL AN ILLUSION. Guckert could easily be a straight guy who wanted to exploit a very profitable niche. Just because he posts some rates and some "customer testimony" doesn't mean it's real. What is real is that he sold smut on the web.

Maybe you're not paying attention but Senator Brownback and Focus on the Family are working very hard to get my field shut down. The AG has implemented new rules on model identification that are very dangerous to the safety of the models. COPA is still in the courts. The very first act from the new AG was to announce they're appealing the Rob Black case.

For all intents and purposes, my livelihood is under attack and this little schmuck gets a free pass to the White House?

Jeff Gannon: Internet Pornographer

It's got a nice ring to it, don'tcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. americablog reiterates my point
http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/hey-red-state-guys-and-jeff-gannon.html

" Hey Red State Guys (and Jeff Gannon), Bush Admin. is coming for your porn
by Joe in DC - 2/28/2005 05:52:00 PM

In keeping with the Bush Administration obsession with sex, the new Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez, has made porn a top priority for the Justice Department according to the Associated Press:

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Monday he would move aggressively to prosecute obscenity cases, and he laid out a broader agenda much like that of his predecessor, John Ashcroft.

In his first lengthy address since becoming attorney general in early February, Gonzales said people who distribute obscene materials do not enjoy constitutional guarantees of free speech..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Blogslut,
If you ever have any time (who does), when you get a chance can you read thru these DU threads? Here is the link---->http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3196579 . This is the 4th thread (it started today) but the other 3 are linked in the first post. It will take you a while to read it. I'd like to get your thoughts on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. my thoughts are
that, while fascinating, the numbers don't add up.

Guckert is 47, which means he would have been 24 in the year of Gosch's kidnapping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. That issue of Gucket's age is questionable.
On his prostitution sites, he claimed a much younger age. Early 30's.

This guy tells so many lies, one cannot rely on anything he says.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Yes but Guckert says he's 47, that doesn't mean it's true.
Who knows how old he is. Imo, he looks to be in his mid 30s. And someone on another thread said he looks 47 because of lines around his eyes. That doesn't mean a thing. He could have lead a hard life. Like I said before, if this dude is pushing 50, he must have been drinking from the fountain of youth at those press conferences.:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
36. I am reminded of the Stephen Wright joke:
Edited on Mon Feb-28-05 02:58 PM by tblue37
I don't know if my girlfriend is really pretty or if she just looks that way.

If a man advertises himself as a whore but doesn't get any customers, that doesn't mean he isn't a whore. It just means he is a lousy failure as a whore.

(Frankly, though, I don't think he is a failed whore. My guess is that he's been pretty successful at his chosen profession.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecorster Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. LOOK AT THIS!
My God, we've found the smoking gun!



http://www.WhiteHouseMemos.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #46
49. Jiggy probably would write something like that.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC