Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gaming the Social Security issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:37 PM
Original message
Gaming the Social Security issue
Edited on Tue Mar-01-05 02:43 PM by Walt Starr
Remember back in Clinton's first term? Everything bad in the world was going to ahppen if "Hillarycare" passed and Clinton's healthcare proposal became an albatross hung around his neck. Ads terrified the public of what would happen if healthcare reform passed.

We have to do the same to Bush over his plan to dismantle Social Security, and polls show we have the right stuff here. If Democrats can keep pounding on this and framing it as "dismantling Social Security", we could actually take back Congress in 2006 because we could nationalize the election over this albatross Bush has hung around his own neck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agree 100%
We need to start educating the public now...we need to do it before BUSH* does......

another post quoted a WH spokesman saying that Bush* hasn't begun to "educate" the public yet......

but the Social Security "War Room " is open.

look out..... here it comes..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree - I'd actually like to see 401k private accounts absorb payroll
tax excess generated by total wage cap removal - since this would increase savings and be good for the economy.

But then Hillary care would have been good for the economy.

Universal child care would have been good for the economy.

But this is politics - and the 1994 screwing we got is now set up to get the GOP in 06 if we just do not cave on private accounts.

Will some Dems trade what is good for the country - total wage cap removal w/ private accounts - for the political gains that are certain in 2006? I do not know.

I do know that if a partial wage cap removal - say the raise to $200,000 that seems on the table - is all they can get - then screw those Dems that agree.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC