Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Vietnam War: pro or con?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:25 PM
Original message
Poll question: The Vietnam War: pro or con?
Unfortunately I think this needs asking, given the number of people here calling Ho Chi Minh a "beast," a "fascist," and a "thug," even though Eisenhower himself admitted Ho could have won 80% support if the US had permitted the Vietnamese to hold their internationally-mandated election in 1956.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spinoza Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The American usage
of a fascistic draft to force virtual "slave" armies to fight in wars they had no desire to fight was wrong, vicious, evil during Vietnam. It would be wrong,vicious and evil if was brought back today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Democrat Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. War is almost always wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. The majority of the people...
... involved in it would now probably say that it was one giant, seventeen-year-long clusterfuck.

Ho Chi Minh wasn't a beast (and, by definition, wasn't a fascist). He was the leader of a country with which we had chosen to go to war, and there was a strong propagandistic need to demonize him and all those in the north of Vietnam. He spurred his people on to fight the French, the Japanese, then the French again, and later, us.

Few people know of his history, and how strongly he believed in the independence of Vietnam, nor do they know how easy it would have been to have made an ally of him--if more sense had prevailed in Washington. Few know that Ho Chi Minh announced the Vietnamese Declaration of Independence in August, 1945, while preparations were being made for Japan's surrender, and that document was almost word for word our own Declaration of Independence.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Fewer people know
That Ho Chi Minh sought the support of the United States in establishing an independent Vietnam, but was spurned by the Americans, who thought it should remain under French control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I recall reading...
... that at the end of WWII, there were only three people on the State Dept.'s SE Asia desk, and none of them could read or write Vietnamese.

My guess is that all that anyone knew of Ho was that he was a communist and was trying to take over the country from the French. That would have been the mindset at the time.

There was a deliberate decision at Yalta, and later, at Potsdam, to return control of all allies' possessions to those allies, and that included Vietnam to the French. What's less well-known is that the US covertly interfered with the internationally-accepted 1956 elections, which were to come about as part of agreements after the French were routed at Dien Bien Phu. The DMZ between north and south was to be a temporary measure until those elections, which were intended to unify the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yep, that's right. He asked the US for help in getting the
imperialist/colonialist French to leave. He was actually naive enough back then to think the US actually believed what they wrote in our declaration of Independence and our constitution. Instead we took up where the French left off and an amazing opportunity was missed.

Think of how much more reasonable the whole situation would have been if we had started reconciliation/reunification talks at the onset of the French withdrawal. Even from a cold war hawk perspective we would have come out better dealing with Ho Chi Mihn as the obvious legitimate leader. He was a Western Educated nationalist who wanted an independent country free of foreign occupation.

Who knows how things would have turned out in that case but it doesn't seem like it would have been any worse than what happened.

Sometimes i wonder what would have happened if the North and the portion of the people in the South who supported expelling the invaders had lost, what the outcome would have been? OK, so the US and it's puppets in the South win the country like in Korea, and we have even more troops stationed along another demarcation line? Or what?

Stepping in as the occupier wasn't exactly peace inducing, and it exacerbated a lot of stuff regionally, like Cambodia, Laos and Thailand. It sure fueled the heroin trade here. Vietnam sucked our country dry financially, emotionally and spiritually. It wasn't worth it, even if we had won it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Tragically wrong and still being fought over here in America-we won
every battle and lost the war. It is beyond comprehension to label Ho Chi Minh a fascist and to equate Stalinism to fascism on a liberal/progressive political website, but it did happen here this morning.

Revisionism is on the march with freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was against it in 1962
thanks to a chance meeting with a Vietnamese student at a university. I pointed out I was a kid, I'd never seen her before and I would likely never see her again, and what was the deal, anyway? She looked around to make sure nobody was listening and then told me that the thing most people wanted was for all the foreigners to stop trying to run their country and to go home. I've been grateful for her honesty since then, and I never did see her again.

I may have been a dumb little kid, but I recognized an anticolonial war when I saw one, and that's what she showed me.

We were lied into that war by a bunch of Pentagon ideologues who had no clue about how the region actually worked or what the people actually wanted.

Just like Iraq. I've seen this movie before, and I know how it ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sympleesmshn Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other, I don't think we can judge....
Everyone should have to read McNamara's book, "In Retrospect". The war was something we got forced into because we were there. While I think we disproved the "domino effect", I think that we had some good reasons to be there... As I said read the book, it shows a side that not many people care to admit exists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Indochina's holocaust perpetrated by America.
Millions of dead, torture, war crimes and atrocities, carpet bombing, assasinations, repression, forced evacuations, "resettlement", illegal invasions of Cambodia and Laos, mass exections, coverups, lies, murder of American civilians by American troops, mass arrests of Americans, imprisonment of dissenters, intimidation, etc, etc.

All under the banner of "saving" Vietnam from the "horrors of Communism". Just like Hitler was saving the world from the "horrors of Bolshevism".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wrong then, wrong now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC