|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:34 AM Original message |
Dems agree on need to overhaul Social Security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OrlandoGator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
1. The "overhaul" is to start taxing incomes over $90,000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I agree with this plan wholeheartedly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enid602 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-28-05 01:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
49. IRA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gizmo1979 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
2. Where does it say dems agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Further in the article - here's the snip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That doesn't come close to answering the question put to you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Headline actually reads "Dem PANS Overhaul" ... interesting change you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:40 AM Original message |
how about: "dems agree bush is trying to dismantle social security" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. Because that's not what the article says... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. repaired or overhauled? big distinction to be made there....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. If there is no problem with Social Security then what is this person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There is no immediate problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. repair is vastly different from overhaul. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
5. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
8. How is this Bullshit? Ready and Willing to start work on a plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Pans = Support? Overhaul= "considering challenges? Okaaay, Mike. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I twisted it because when I read it - that's what the article was saying.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 01:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. wow, more twisting!! LOL. the dems pan social security?!? ROTFL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 08:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
40. I forgot Poland - Dammit!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 08:49 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. BA-HA-HA *cough cough* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 10:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I'm Pure EVIL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Which isn't "overhaul" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. When I talk to people about social security... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 01:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. more SS tax on earners over 90K....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. What's the purpose of a cap anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. maybe it's time for you to send DU a small check so you can use the search |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 01:31 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. First of all the system will not be bankrupt in 2041 (or 52 or whatever) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. "the trustees who oversee the government retirement program" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Then where the hell is the AP getting this bankrupt model by 2041? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Career Prole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 04:07 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. That pretty much covers it, bro. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liveoaktx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
15. Levin Vid Clips-from the Social Security Policy hearing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
22. System needs to be tweaked to fit new data on growth of usa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Is there a way that we could put money in the stock market and not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 04:12 PM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Fuck voluntary privatization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 05:22 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. 1) it's not my bullshit plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Derisive nonsense should be met with derision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 06:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Yes, that was my intent - to decieve, you have found me out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 06:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-28-05 12:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Bush has admitted that the voluntary privatization does not even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 10:59 PM Response to Reply #26 |
46. I agree that stock market should not be avoided. Because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
25. No, they do not think it needs an overhaul. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AirAmFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
27. Social Security is FINE: it's the COUNTRY that Dubya and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Reagan was actually Zaphod Beeblebrox - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. SS needs some fixing to make it more progressive, like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. My bi-partisan compromise that would fix social security |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 07:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
39. How much more would removing the cap bring into the system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 08:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Do you know the projected rate of growth the trustees use to arrive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-28-05 12:47 AM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Most K-12 teachers in 12 states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
42. BOY, what short memories everyone have! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikelewis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-27-05 10:13 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. DO NOT MANIPULATE THE DEBATE WITH HISTORICAL FACTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC