Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't it redundant to kill someone then autopsy them?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:12 PM
Original message
Isn't it redundant to kill someone then autopsy them?
I'm wathching Medium and they're watching a guy from death row get killed. States require them to be autopsied before they are released to the families. More tax dollars wasted?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. The original purpose of such statutes was...
... to prove that the death was not 'cruel', believe it or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Weird.
How does that prove anything besides their state at death?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. what were they looking for?
I mean, if it's the chair, are they looking for burns and stuff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's state law that after someone is put to death...
They have to have an autopsy. On this episode of Medium, the guy was lethally injected.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. There's also an additional reason, actually...
In Ilinois, when anyone dies 'at the hands of another' (homicide), an autopsy is virtually mandatory to establish the cause and manner f death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gotta slice'em up to
make sure that they're dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gotta blame the liberals for this...
If not for them the state would be killing people without any notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, redundancy assures that the job is done.
I mean, if you wanna be sure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. No.
As someone who has actually observed a few autopsies, I can state, categorically, that the sole purpose of an autopsy is for forensics.
There very well may be a case, solicited by the Schindlers, with Jeb's approval, to charge Michael Schiavo (or some within the court system) with manslaughter.
If the forensics show, once and for all, that Terri Schiavo had nothing but liquid in place of where the emotional and rationalizing epicenter of the cerebral cortex is, then there's no case.
The reason this is important, from my understanding, is that, because of some experimental metal nodes of some sort in Mrs. Schiavo's brain, a more detailed PET scan cannot be performed; therefore, all we have is the less-detailed CAT scan and 15 years of non-responsiveness.
It's all forenisics. I'm no expert, by any stretch, but I've covered my fair share of trials, medical examiners, police case and even Dr. William Bass and the Body Farm in my years as a reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thanks for that explaination. I had asked on another post why
Michael had asked for an autopsy. As much as I always think I thought of everything, I NEVER thought of the opposition charging him with manslaughter!

Yet another reason I have a living will, and Healthcare POA that states NO ARTIFICIAL MEANS OF LIFE SUPPORT! After this insanity, I figure...if they never put it in, they won't have to worry about taking it out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. In a normal world, no one WOULD charge him with manslaughter
But, my guess is that the criminal courts will not do it, but her family possibly will file a wrongful death suit in civil court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It's very sad when relatives hate! They can be so much more
vindictive than almost any other enemy.

One more time, I'me afraid the only winners in this whole thing are the lawyers!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcon007 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder if they use sterile needles and alcohol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yes, they do.
So as not to infect the people performing the autopsy in case of an accident.
It's really an amazing process. If you can get past two elements: the breaking of the breast plate and the sawing off of the top of the skull, the rest is really quite interesting. It's those initial, invasive techniques that really make your stomach knot up, but, once inside, curiosity of the human body and its workings takes over and it's not so "gross" anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. While my friend was taking Anatomy in medical school
she was going to take me to the lab to see the people. I'm curious about pretty much everything revolving around the human body. Our schedules never met up where I could go, but I was ready to jump at the chance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. An Operating Room nurse told me this same thing....
that the worst part of surgery for her was the initial incision through the skin of the breathing three-dimensional human being, and once the incision was made the anatomy text memory and human body geography part of her brain took over, and the human-beingness of the patient faded into the background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't know what "Medium" is,
but if they are autopsying executed prisoners, it's probably to find out if:

the bad bone is connected to the crime bone; the crime bone is connected to the evil bone; the evil bone is connected to the terrorist bone; now hear the Word of the Dub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Medium is a show on NBC starring Patricia Arquette as a Psychic
Medium. It's supposed to be based on a true person and her adventures.
It's really good.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. LOL!!
I know you're making a funny, but it is true that they do take DNA samples of certain types of criminals for research purposes. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes and sometimes they take the entire brain for research
There have been some interesting studies done on the brains of sociopaths, for instance.

I agree with your other statements, Michael ordered the autopsy to ensure that Terri's cerebral cortex was indeed gone. This will protect him from any civil suits but I also think he wants to set the public record straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC