Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Alabama Question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:29 PM
Original message
The Alabama Question
My first post wasn't phrased that well. As many of you may know, the GOP convention is scheduled 2 days after Alabama's filing date- so as it stands now, Bush won't get the Democrat-controlled legislature to change the law for him-pity.

http://www.annistonstar.com/opinion/2003/as-editorials-0424-editorial-3d23p4224.htm

Gore only got 40% of the vote in 2000, but he didn't try. In fact, noone has. The last Dem president to carry Alabama was Carter. In a time when the Democrats need Southern states, the prospect of Bush running as a write-in candidate against a democrat and the libertarian party is awesome. But will it hold? Do you think the Bamacrats will change the law to avoid getting Bushes and lawyers shoved down their throats?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. They'll change it. Alabama is now almost solidly Repuke.
Governor on down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. nope, Democrats still have the majority in both houses of the legislature
but since these are mostly conservative Democrats, it remains to be seen what they'll do.

This does sew West Virginia up for us though, if that state is also affected like I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nannygoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. So is Illinois but I haven't heard what
it plans to do about it. Oh, please don't let * on the ballot in Illinois!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romberry Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Old news. The legislature already made the change.
The change to allow Smirk on the ballot passed in the last session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What?
You can change things when it's in the interest of the voter? That can't be right, I could swear I heard somewhere that wasn't right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. blech
what about the other states? California, West Virginia and Illinois I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trek234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. It will be a cold day in hell when AL goes Blue
Doesn't matter if they have to write Bush in - Alabama WILL go Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joeve Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. What did you expect from Alabamans?
I'm not surprised they voted to let George off the hook, after all, he's a good Christian who would never lie, right? And he's going out there and killing those ragheads: who cares about them? They're all going to hell, anyway, right?

You know, the South gets more federal tax dollars than they pay out, whereas the industrial Northeast pays out more federal tax than they get in: in essence they subsidize their poorer Southern neighbors. So maybe what we ought to do is to even things out, in fact let's go back for the last fifty years or so and make the South pay the Northeast back for carrying them all these years.

These people are so stupid, if you DID do that,and phrased it in such a way as to make it look like you were getting the feds out of their hair, they'd vote for it, overwhelmingly. That kind of arrogant stupidity deserves to be punished, IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. It's "Alabamians", by Joeve!
And I'm not taking this personally,
but generalities do rankle just a bit.
We'll return the money if you'll take back all the snowbirds.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Illinois is probably our best chance
Too many Dixiecrats still in Alabama. Other states where this problem existed or still exist are: West Virginia, Texas, Indiana and California. I suppose WV is a possibility for keeping him off; Republicans control everything in Texas; Indiana, last I heard was moving toward changing the deadline. I don't know about California. I suppose the Democrats (who control everything there) could say, "we don't have time to be bothered with this. We have a huge budget deficit, a recall election and stalemate in the legislature. It's not our fault you guys CHOSE to hold a late convention to exploit the 9/11 tragedy! Don't waste our time!" The Illinois Board of Elections was going through the motions to make the change, but they asked the Attorney General (D) for an opinion first. That was the last I heard there.

We can always say to them, "You can't change the rules just because you don't like the outcome!" (When have we heard that before?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. This will mean we won't have to fight for Illinois
and will make West Virginia far far easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I hadn't heard about West Virginia
This is good, though. WV is usually a southern state that you can count on going Dem, but Gore didn't carry it (no surprise there.) It only has 3 or 4 electoral votes, but that would have made the difference last time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. it's got 5
if we can get every state Gore did + WV and NV, we win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. No state is going to keep a sitting president (sic) off the ballot
it just isn't going to happen. I hope they make a big stink about republicans asking them to change the rules before they do, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I disagree...
The states aren't going to keep him off the ballot, blame the GOP for filing too late. Also, I agree with Trof that there are too many generalities. I grew up in Alabama, and I don't remember hardly any Republicans there. The ones that exist are because of race-baiting, but they are by no means the majority. I don't see how, if Bama has two houses controlled by Democrats and frequently has Dem governors, one could say it is "solidly Republican." It's just the fact that nobody bothers to campaign there, or they don't know how to do it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I met the Lt. Gov. (D) yesterday
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 03:26 PM by trof
and she might be worth a thread all to herself.
Funny, witty, intelligent, and not bad looking for a "lady of a certain age".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. perhaps, but they are mostly conservative Democrats
that will vote Republican in presidential elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He misses the California Ballot too
Now I know why the push for recall of the Dem Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. even if they succeed
the legislature won't give him it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. AWOL would lose Alabama if he ran as a Democrat. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Doesn't matter
Even conservative Democrats can be persuaded to be partisan. Look at Zell Miller for example. He is no doubt the most conservative Dem in the Senate. But when Repubes tried to convince him to switch parties and give them control of the Senate, he wouldn't have it. Traditional loyalty in Alabama is to the Democrats, and if that could be communicated over ideology, we win every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC