|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Amy6627 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:19 PM Original message |
Is it in the Constitution: Congress shall pass no law affecting one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DIKB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. Do a search on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amy6627 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks! I found this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adwon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 07:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. actually it did, by denying micheal schiavos rights |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adwon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It's hard to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not true, but there is a partial truth in there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amy6627 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 06:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Thanks for your help. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. Bills of Attainder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amy6627 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 07:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Thank you very much! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 07:12 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. But that isnt a bill of attainder, just a violation of seperation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
journalist3072 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 08:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I see your point, but..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K-W (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-05 08:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I dont think any judge would buy that argument, but hey, I'm not a judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC