Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld and Bob Graham on Meet the Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:58 AM
Original message
Rumsfeld and Bob Graham on Meet the Press
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 08:00 AM by Armstead
Not together, but Russert just said Rumsfeld then Graham.

Will be interesting to see how the two are handled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. PLEASE UPDATE!!
I dont have cable or NBC, LMK what is going on!!

I'm stuck watching Fox, Rice is getting practice on here...lob that softball right this way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. rummy is on ABC right now (EST)
This Week with George Stephanopolous

blowing it off as 'nothing'

tenet and the intelligence services to a good job ?????????

yeah, tell that to the 9/11 families
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Timmy is actually pushing him fairly hard about number of troops & the
quagmire. Rummy spinning like a dervish. He just said we "...have
already formally requested NATO for help..." I never heard this before.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Last DEC!
He'd mentioned that in the hearing last week- they then asked when. He had to "get back to them" after the break and said the request was made last Dec. Remember? They tried to get NATO into Turkey to "protect" it? NATO said no because the members opposed the war!

They haven't asked after the fact as a method of fixing the HUGE problem of having no cred and no plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. "We're making progress in Iraq..."
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 08:08 AM by Armstead
but unfortunately the more progress we make, the more vicious the attacks will become." -- Rummy

(Will try to provide highlights, but am also doing something else, so anyone who can pick up slack wold be good,)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Did he actually say that??? What a DOPE!
"...the more progress we make, the more vicious the attacks will become."

Does that even make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. "Beatings will continue until morale improves"...
One of my favorite taglines from the old Fido network.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rummy's on This Week right now in NYC market...
Steph asking about how Niger got into the SOTU speech. I two VCRs going this morning to tape all of the Sunday shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I get ABC....
it's on at 10:30am for me though.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rumsfeld now mentioning Bosnia
"They didn't know cost then." Using it to justify higher costs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Rummy
looks like he's about to blow a fuse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. "I don't KNOW how many.....I don't KNOW..."
He said when Gen. SHINSEKI(sp) said stabilizing would take "several thousand" troops, that "SEVERAL" means 300,000 and above, that there are 148,000, that he DOES NOT KNOW how many it will take. (How come G.E.RUSSERT pinned DEAN to a NUMBER about the military 3 weeks ago?)

Darth RUMS testy. About France participating, "I've ANSWERED that FIFTEEN times. YES."

G.E.: "The INFAMOUS words pResident (Shrub) uttered." Rums: "The use of the word 'infamous' is (sputter sputter)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Would someone tell him
That Bosnia was a NATO mission, not a US mission. There's a big difference. Besides, how many troops did the US lose in Bosnia? And how many lives were saved by ending a brutal civil war? In Iraq, the society was functioning and we went in and destroyed it. There is no comparision between the two conflicts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. NATO
Russert mentioning Senate vote to bring in NATO. Will we request NATO?

"We already have requested that. Back last year."

"15 of 19 NATO countries already assisting in Iraq."

France and Germany?

"I don;t know. It's up to them."

(He's very testy.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. "pieces of indications"

of suggested possibile cooperation btw SH and al Qaeda...

sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. oh boy
"pieces of indications"

oh man, and they complain about Clinton parsing words. ... shit he could take serious lessons from these criminals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norbert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. Rummy is groping, people
Russert hit him with the "We know where the WMD are. He's reaching and his viens are popping up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. My God..Rumsfeld is slimy...& Tim pretending to "grill" him is sickening!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's 6:30 AM on the Left Coast. Interesting to get these previews -
Keep 'em coming!

MTP doesn't start for another 90 minutes out here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
18. Graham
"Not a problem of intelligence. A problem with George Bush."

Going after the Big Picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. "Stretches belief..."
doubts Cheney would ask for investigation of Africa, and then not get a report back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Selective use of intelligence
supportive evidence was hyped. Contraditory evidence put in back seat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. "neurotic, obsessive, bizarre" - the Notebooks
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 09:04 AM by UTUSN
Wouldn't these be used as a tool, subpoenaed by KLAYMAN or whomever, any time they wanted to hassle and harass us?

G.E.: "Why should Dems nominate Bob GRAHAM (last in the polls/money). (Running for re-election/senator?"

"I am RUNNING for POTUS." (repeated 5 times.) Way to slam G.E. upside the head.

Am cutting G.E. off before he returns with the Classic MtP Moment, since it is a reminder of how good the real deal journalists of the past were. Same as with This Weak, I cut out right after the round table, before George "Debate Books" WILL spews his Deep Thoughts at the end, or when he expects to win whimsy points by his raptures about baseball.

Anway, words for captioning: "SIXTEEN WORDS." ("Infamous" optional for now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Changenow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. You are right about the subpoenas
Then again it would keep him honest, wouldn't it?

Didn't he vote against the War resolutionn because he didn't think it went far enough?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lkinsale Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. He voted against Iraq because he said it was the wrong target
Senator Graham's Floor Statement on the Iraq Resolution


I would also like to reinforce my conviction that this resolution forces the President to focus our military and intelligence on the wrong target. A historical example, which has been used in this debate, is the example of the 1930s? that England, France and other nations would eventually join in the world's greatest alliance, slept, while Hitler's power grew.

Senator Graham's Floor Statement on the Iraq Resolution


They say that passing this resolution is the equivalent of if the Alllies had declared war on Hitler. I disagree with that assessment of what this lesson of history means. In my judgment, passing this resolution tonight will be the equivalent of declaring war on Italy. That is not what we should be doing. We should not just be declaring war on Mussolini's Italy. We should be declaring war on Hitler's Germany.

Now, there are good reasons for considering attacking today's Italy, meaning Iraq. Saddam Hussein's regime has chemical and biological weapons and is trying to get nuclear capacity. But the briefings I have received have shown that trying to block him and any necessary nuclear materials have been largely successful, as evidenced by the recent intercept of centrifuge tubes. And he is years away from having nuclear capability. So why does it make sense to attack this era's Italy, and not Germany, especially when by attacking Italy, we are making Germany a more probable adversary?

Madam President, the CIA has warned us that international terrorist organizations will probably use United States action against Iraq as an indication for striking us here in the homeland.


******

He did use say the resolution was "timid, limited and weak," in the context of not addressing the real issues of terrorism and al Qaeda. He's not a dove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. Seems like Rumsfeld intimidated Russert...
Rumsfeld put on a pretty good performance...he comes on hard, and it seemed like Russert was sort of thrown by him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Graham: "Selling you swampland". Also, the notebooks.
Graham did a good job laying out the chronology about the Niger/SOTU issue, who did what, when, and then closed with the quip about "Selling you some swampland in Florida" re the denials and statemenst coming out of the Whitehouse.

Also, that info about Grahams personal notebooks was pretty funny. Sort of a personal eccentricity. He keeps notes as to what he had for breakfast and the time he had it...well, thats pretty harmless. Its on of those details that sort of humanizes a candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I really like Graham....
he has done the best interview, in my opinion.....second would be Kerry...on MTP that I have seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. Russert must have been castrated
since his interview with Dean. No cojones whatsoever. Rummy had him fumbling worse than Dean was, and its evident that Russert is somehow in awe of him. Pathetic.

He was asking the right questions, but no followup. Why did the President make the statement when it was based on intel that was deemed faulty a year earlier? Simple question. Wasn't asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wes_clark_for_pres Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Agree....sounds like the
"there you go again" playbook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. Rummy's hands are shaking!
Edited on Sun Jul-13-03 09:12 AM by FlashHarry
When Tim called him on the "double the cost" line. He was nervously rubbing his hands. It was a beautiful sight.

Jesus! Rummy's squirming and parsing like a motherf#cker. He's giving Tim the definition of "several hundred thousand." Wow. I guess that's the definition of "is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC