Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Pope's and Priests be married?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:15 PM
Original message
Should Pope's and Priests be married?
I'm not Catholic but I'm aware of all the melostation of the young boys. I was just talking with my mother about this and we think that the Pope and priests should be allowed to be married if they wish. In my church we have Elders and deacons and they're married and have families. There are some requirements of course that are Biblical to elect one. I was wondering what Catholics thought about this and if they should change a tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. To Each Other??????
That would solve a lot of problems.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. LOL no
If they meet someone and fall in love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. i don't think anyone's ever really considered that
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rich Hunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. yes, that's a great idea!


Because we all know that nothing prevents child abuse like marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagiana Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
40. Yes, and nuns too.

In fact, priests marrying nuns is probably a pretty good solution. If Ratzinger is elected, it won't happen anytime soon (50 years AT LEAST).

BTW, word has it that if Ratzinger is selected, his papal name will be Claven I.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't see why not
They used to be allowed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Really?
What made them change??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Differing reasons have
been given. A local council decided for it in Spain in the year 300 A.D. and the overall Church in 1139 A.D.. Though most citing holy orders as conflicting with marriage, I suspect it had to do more with protecting assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Land passed from father to son, and the church did not want
church assets leaving the church.. celibacy was the solution they came up with..It's celibacy in name only for most, I presume...but the custom continues..

Priests should be allowed to marry,or NOT..it should be their choice. They should be salaried employees like the reat of us, and if they choose to have a zillion kids, then they too, can apply for d=food stamps and assistance.

If the church did this, they would not have a shortage of priests, and the concentration of "weirdos" might be more dilute..

It takes a very "unusual" young man who would give up a very important part of life to become a "servant" to a bunch of older guys for so many years, in hopes of one day becoming one of them.. Not ALL are weirdos, but priesthood has always offered a sanctuary to some who have a perverted side to them, and they know they can "fly under the radar" in the priesthood.. look how many years it took to finally bring some of them to justice//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I think the idea behind celibacy in the clergy
is that in a world where faith is central to government, the power of the church can become inherited, and therefore diluted.

It's the church protecting itself from would-be holy monarchs and it is the monarchy protecting itself from competition; both ideas are a bit dated in the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. No. The origins of church celibacy lay in property acquisition; members of
the church were marrying powerful families so that the church could acquire land and property; somewhere down the road it was banned so that the church's power could be somewhat restrained.

The alleged piousity that followed was just posing and posturing.

It's my understanding that the whole virgin Mary/virgin birth myth came about substantially later in the bible's on-going evolution as well... possibly only within the past 150 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kmarx Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. Second Lateran Council
The Second Lateran Council in 1139 AD decreed that the marriage of priests was invalid. Prior to this clergymen were allowed to marry. Those who support celibacy forget that many of the apostles were married! Some believe that the idea of celibacy was based on economic gain, that is, the church would not need to support the families of priests and would inherit whatever the priest owned at his death. (This latter practice does not apply these days, at least not in the USA.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. priests who convert from Episcopalian to RC and who are already married
can stay married and there are other churches in communion with Rome that allow married priests so why not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Also, Eastern Catholic priests
have been allowed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitSileya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
39. Yes, that's true.
We have a chaplain in our parish who is married. He was a Lutheran minister before he converted. However, part of the agreement is that he cannot be parish priest, only chaplain, as long as he's married, and he cannot remarry if his wife should die.

My opinion is that secular priests, that is, priests who are not also monks, should be able to do the same as deacons - married men should be able to become priests, but if their wife dies, they cannot remarry. I don't think the fact that the paedophile priests could not marry had anything to do with their molestation, but the fact that priests cannot marry has made it less attractive to become priests, and therefore the Church as not done its job in screening seminary candidates. And looked the other way when those miscreants abused children, instead of tossing them out, because "the Church needs its priests."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is molestation related to not being married?
?
If it were about sex, wouldn't they be able to get it on with nuns, or each other?

I think priests should be able to be date/be married like any other pastor/preacher/reverend.

I guess that would mean the pope too...but that would be strange!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think so too
They should be able to have a life outside of their spiritual life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. yes, absolutely
Edited on Mon Apr-18-05 01:22 PM by GreenArrow
I would have defintely considered the priesthood if marriage -- a sacrament of the Catholic Church -- had been open. As it is, I am a Waaaaaaayyyyy lapsed Catholic, who doesn't really anticipate returning to the Church. Monks and nuns, I think, should maintain vows of celibacy. Additionally, women should be eligible for the priesthood. There are no rational reasons to support either celibate priesthood, or male only priesthood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. There are
Biblical references to women not being preachers. I believe it's in First Corinthians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Paul strikes again!
Edited on Mon Apr-18-05 01:27 PM by tjdee
More and more, as I go through life as a Christian, I consider keeping the gospels and ignoring everything else.

Jesus himself, who Christians purport to worship, never said any such thing. A number of things in modern Christianity come from Paul and what Paul thought.

IMO, Paul's letters were written in context of the time, which was, as everyone recalls, a gazillion years ago. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Right
With Jesus we're all equal in the church. No one should be above each other. That's why I like how my church does things. With us the elders are those who make decisions for the church (there's a small handful of them but it depends on the size cause my grandparents church they only have two) and the deacons help with other programs and running them. My dad is a deacon and his job is a variety of tasks like nursing home communion, driving vans, counting etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. there are also biblical references to women
Edited on Mon Apr-18-05 01:30 PM by GreenArrow
being virtual equals with men in the early church as well. Paul was perhaps not in favor of it. But whether Paul supported it or not, the idea of women not being preachers is in and of itself, not rational. Not allowing women priests was a political decision, not a spiritual one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Much of the blame for the molestation has been pointed at
the lack of normal sexual development of many priests. Since many of them started down the path to priesthood while still in their teens, they did not mature sexually. If marriage was an option to Catholic clergy, and they proceeded through their clerical education with the possibility of having sexual relations, a family etc,. then I think the molestation problem would abate to the same levels as seen in the society at large. I seriously doubt Gay priests would be allowed to enter marriages though.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. I believe (and this is pure speculation) that some young men who
considered the priesthood may not have been strongly attracted to women. They may have believed that this fact made them especially suited to the priesthood/celibacy, but in truth they were attracted (for whatever reason) to children/young adolescents, even though they didn't realize it at the time they made a commitment/entered seminary.

Put this way, the proportion of young men with lower than average sex drives/sexual urges would be lower in the priesthood than the general population. The proportion of young men not attracted to women (with urges toward pedophilia so firmly suppressed they were unaware of them) would be higher among seminarians than the general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Yes. It would solve the problem of not enough priests
and go a long way towards filling the parishes with more well adjusted leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Pedophilia should not be equated with homosexuality...
... as you seem to suggest in your post.

Do I think priests should be able to marry? Yes, whether they are gay or straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. For years I have been thinking priests should be allowed to marry
There would be a lot more priests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The first pope
was evidently married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. whaddaya mean (Peter?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Matthew 8:14-15
Well, maybe he wasn't married, but he sure as heck had a mother-in-law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I don't have a Bible around, sorry. But besides that
maybe his wife died before he met Jesus. I have to write that sipposition because that's the way the church deals with things, you know? Sort of ignore things that don't quite come together. Priests were married in the middle ages as I recall and because they are having such a hard time attracting "good" candidates I wish they would bite the bullet already. I'm an ex-Catholic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bmbmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Here you go.
Matthew 8:14-15

14. And Jesus came to Simon's house and he saw his mother-in-law in bed with fever.*
15. And he touched her hand and the fever left her, and she got up and served them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. cool , thanks
Edited on Mon Apr-18-05 02:31 PM by barb162
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. That is true
I think that's true. Maybe others will be interested but they never could before cause they were married.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. you look at the Anglicans and they don't seem to have any problems
with it, I always thought they were the closest religion to the Catholic church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. Organized Christianity has little to do with Christ's teachings.
It's ironic that Christianity would probably have remained a small Jewish sect had it not been for Paul. But, Paul distorted most of Christ's teachings in order to spread it. Since then, it has become little more than a money machine for the various churches which ignore what Jesus had to say about the temple and the moneychangers. Not to mention his elevation of women.

Too bad, the guy had a great message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. I believe that clergy should be able to be marry....
Although the celibate path does suit some spiritual paths, it's not for all. Actually, Orthodox priests may not marry--but married men may become priests in those churches.

I also think women should be ordained, even if the Bible says otherwise.

By the way, marriage does not prevent all pedophilia.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Do individual Catholics get to vote on this,
and possibly change the Pope's/Vatican's stance on celibacy?
Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. Celibacy
I think the problem is that with celibacy, the RCC offers a safe haven for those who have desires that out of whack. Or so they think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC2099 Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
35. As far as married priests....
It is written :
Man cannot serve 2 masters!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC