Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting point. Kerry's action in Vietnam versus Ratzinger's in Germany

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:54 AM
Original message
Interesting point. Kerry's action in Vietnam versus Ratzinger's in Germany
Kerry volunteered as an adult for what I am sure most of us agree was an immoral war.

Ratzinger was conscripted as a team for what was without a doubt an immoral war.

Kerry is credited by the army with 20 official "kills."
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0421041kerry1.html

Ratzinger has stated that he never fired a shot.

Kerry as an adult in a free society had to have a greater understanding of the war before he joined than a child in an autocratic society.

Now, I'm not comparing the President to the Pope. They are very different roles.

But, to be consistent, shouldn't we have objected to the fact that our nominee volunteered to kill 20 people in an unjust war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Watch out for the flames.
You just offended two groups with one blow (I agree with you by the way).

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I like Kerry and voted for Kerry
I just think it's an interesting argument.

I should really be a law professor somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RPM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
50. unless your JD is from Harvard or Yale
and you are at the top of the class there, keep dreaming along with me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. He redeemed himself in my eyes by working tirelessly to
stop the Viet Nam conglagration.

He may have been credited with 20 kills.

I wonder how many innocent Vietnamese and American's lives he saved by helping to end the war.

And you are right. He's not being considered for Pope. He was to be elected as commander in chief of an army, whose function is to kill people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're right.
There is no comparison between president and pope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. I agree and made the same point in a different thread.
There are plenty of other reasons to object to Ratzinger. There is no reason for us to fall to the same level of intellectual dishonesty as the Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I may have stole this idea from you
But I thought it deserved to be fleshed out in its own thread.

I tried to start a discussion on Ratzinger's theology which sank like a stone. That would require thought.

It's easier to scream, "Nazi! Nazi!"

Anyway, it always disaoppoints me when we have some objectionable person and simply choose the weakest yet most titilating complaint.

I actually felt this way in the campaign when it became a debate of who was more honorable in 1968. Here you had George Bush who spent a lifetime partying and living off his dad's name, who then stumbled intow the Governor's office and had no real success and who then had a first time that combined the worst terrorist attack in American history, a failing economy, and a disastrous war based on lies....and we worry about what he was doing in Alabama in the 60s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It is what I call "Clarence Thomas" syndome.
Screaming Nazi is an easy way to object, but in the end diminishes the strength of real substantive arguments. It is the same syndrome that let people challenge Thomas b/c of Anita Hill when the real issue was that he is not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court.

The real issue here is that Ratzinger is a conservative ideologue who will alienate large portions of the church while at the same time embolding its more conservative elements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Precisely...it's intellectual laziness
I call it FoxNews Syndrome though it has been happening for years.

If you ever want to weep, read the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Today, the two of them would be on Hardball screaming "Slave-holder!" and "Nigger-lover!" at each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry shouldn't be Pope
...and Ratfucker shouldn't be helping W get elected.

there, that was simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. He didn't volunteer to kill 20 people
He volunteered to serve his country during time of War. A trait I find admirable, having spent 24 years in uniform myself. I find his actions extremely honorable during his time in Vietnam and his objections afterword. His service is easily and favorably compared to others who are enjoying constitutional liberties in this country today and who are striving to undermine those liberties. I'd serve with LT Kerry anyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Agree...
It's really easy to say that Kerry joined an unjust war... almost forty years after the fact. Judging Kerry like this is the same as judging all of our soldiers. I completely disagree with this.

I do agree that the Pope should not be condemned for joining the Hitler army. He should be condemned for defending pedophiles and being anti-women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. I don't think the intent of the post is actually to suggest that Kerry
is not fit for office because he volunteered. It is merely intended to point out the intellectual dishonesty of people who supported Kerry but now condemn Ratzinger, when the circumstances of Kerry's volunteering as an adult are arguably more egregious than Ratzinger being drafted at 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Good point Chief
Many here don't seem to realize that at the time of Kerry's enlistment, 1966 I believe, the truth about the Viet Nam war wasn't well known. There were many who enlisted thinking that it was in the best interest of their country but relatively few that had the balls to return to the States and help bring out the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Military recruits in the 60's were disillusioned into thinking the war
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 11:08 AM by bushisanidiot
was just and that america was always on the side of right.. it wasn't til after Kerry had boots on the ground and experienced the injustice firsthand that he realized it was wrong.

signing up for combat was a brave thing for Kerry to do.. much different than President Pussy who had his daddy do everything possible to keep him out of harm's way.

Kerry returned from the war, seeing the error of his and the U.S. military's ways.. there is much honor in that.

President AWOL George Bush has never apologized or admitted to making mistakes regarding his military "career".. he knows he's a coward and thinks it will stay hidden as long as he avoids talking about it.

Kerry talks about his past in the military. He has nothing to hide and has opened his military past for all to see.

Look what's happening today: Kerry continues to fight for veterans' rights and fights to protect our values. AWOL Bush is cutting veterans' benefits right and left because he HATES the military and america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Hitler had one of the finest propaganda machines ever assembled.
Don't you suspect that many young Germans thought what they were doing was right? Are they excused b/c they bought the propaganda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Hitler targeted a group of people for extermination. No, I don't forgive
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 11:14 AM by bushisanidiot
those who were so clueless that they bought his propaganda.. just like I do NOT forgive the freeptards for buying the propaganda spewed by AWOL Bush's admin. regarding Saddam Hussein being responsible for 9/11, and how the iraqi people had to die in shock and awe so we could avoid a mushroom cloud and we could have cheaper gas prices, etc.

stoooopid people who condone evil acts ARE NOT EXCUSED! They are as bad as those who committed the evil acts. Their judgement day will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Why is Kerry noble for buying the propaganda, but people in
Germany during the 30's are stoopid? Is the fact tha Kerry thought "america is always right" evidencetha he is stoopid too, and hence not deserving of forgiveness in your book?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Kerry wasn't inspired by the whole "lets kill them before they kill us"
freeptard mentality that hitlers brain dead minions and AWOL Bush's brain dead followers participate in today.

i honestly thought the military was being used in the way it was intended to be used. there weren't any "kill the rag-heads!" type Toby Keith propaganda back then that he would have been influenced by. that kind of crap was coming out of the repuke side when dirty dick slithered into the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. Yet, the ADL seems ok with Ratzinger
Very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Timeliness matters.
Let me first say that I don't hold Ratzinger's draft at the age of 14 against him BUT

when Kerry vlounteered he did not see the war as unjust or immoral. Once he SAW that he dedicated a great deal of his time and life to ending it.

One fine point on Ratzinger, however, is that while he never fired a shot...he did guard a facility that was used to exterminate Jews, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, he DID NOT guard a concentration camp
He was assigned to guard a BMW facility in Germany that was using slave labor.

You needed to be Waffen SS to guard concentration camps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. OK my mistake, but is slave labor any better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. No...but I doubt he had much of a choice
I don't think 17-year-old privates could really claim conscientious objector status in 1944. Who knows if he even knew what he was guarding at the time?

Most of the important German plants were underground at that point anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Yes, they could claim CO.
They were sent to work camps.
They then did slave labor.

Just like John Paul II did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I think we was assigned to a BMW plant
And the plant used slave labor.

I'm not sure that's akin to being a guard at Dachau.

And anyway, he apparently deserted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. The BMW plant used Dachau slave labor.
Ironic you pick that camp.

Anyway, he deserted in May of 1945--AFTER HITLER HAD SHOT HIMSELF AND THE RUSSIANS TOOK BERLIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. He desserted in '44
I don't know why '45 keeps getting thrown around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Because he did desert in '45.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Have your Kevlar and Nomex handy.
You've dared to bring logic into the forefront, an act which will get you flamed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vpigrad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. Both are horrible, but...
Kerry was running against Bush so we had no choice but to support and vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Well, that's one viewpoint
I think the better viewpoint is that it is foolish to take a snapshot from one period of a person's life and extrapolate that into the person's character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. It matters that Ratzinger supports authoritarianism and fascism TODAY.
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 11:18 AM by blm
The Hitler youth aspect of his life is just a footnote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I agree
I have no problem with that argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. He does?
Please cite evidence for that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Interfering in our election so a fascist could maintain power.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Show me where he did that, if you will.
I'd like to read the statement where he did so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. It's on the front page
It's on the front page of Democratic Underground.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. Speak for yourself. Most of us knew Kerry's record of service included
investigating and exposing more government corruption than any lawmaker in modern history and are honored that such a statesman and advocate was representing our vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. The difference is this.
Kerry joined what he thought was a moral war, fought to the best of his ability, and then as soon as he returned, took the unpopular position and fought against it tooth and nail.

Ratzinger joined what he knew was an immoral war, fought neither here nor there, and then hung around with who he knew was the wrong side until they were defeated. And then claimed that all along he would have fought against the Nazis, but the right moment just never came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. That's interesting
You really know the two guys very well. Especially what they thought at any point of time. Not objective but interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. Since both of them have written books,
and have had several biographers, it's not too difficult :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. .
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 12:04 PM by Hav
Does that mean that you have read Ratzingers' books?
If yes, please tell us what he has written about being a Nazi and so on or what he did and thought after being drafted. The time in the army, was it only doing nothing and letting the time pass?
How did he feel later about the war, does he mention that? There are many who would like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. 
If you'd actually like to know, I would advise doing so much as a google search on the guy. It's not like his stance on the Nazi era is hard to find. If for some reaason you are unable to find Google, I'll help you out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. enlighten us
So you didn't read his books? Disappointing. I was so hoping that you actually knew what were talking about :(.
There are many who were searching but couldn't find the specific information. For example, what were his thougts about his time in the army and whether he regretted it, you know, like renouncing the "Nazi past". Not the already often pasted little pieces about never having shot etc.

And to be clear about it, I am not at all happy with a Pope like Ratzinger. His actual positions worry my more than his youth though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. 
I've read his autobiography, but idiotic book-report tests at the behest of some stranger on the Interweb isn't my idea of a fun time. The information is freely available. I find it hard to believe you *actually* cannot find a single scrap of information relating to his repudition of the Nazi regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. Ratzinger and Kerry - birds of a feather. Politicians.
Kerry volunteered for combat in Vietnam and later denounced his deeds when the war became unpopular. Ratzinger, with more justification, was a Hitler Youth, and later denounced Naziism.

Kerry became a hawk when going to war with Iraq was popular and has tried to justify his vote ever since. Ratzinger was supposedly "liberal" early on, and turned conservative when JPII became honcho. Now he's blathering about "unity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
41. It's not an interesting point. It's a dumb one.
Kerry returned and protested the war. As a Senator, he played a key role in the BCCI and Iran-Contra investigations.

Ratzinger grew up, and as a cardinal has suppressed free thought in the Catholic Church, attacked other religions, pooh-poohed the child molestations by priests as overblown and media-fed, and encouraged hatred of homosexuals.

And you say you're not comparing the President to the Pope, but that's the basis of your entire dumb point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. And Ratzinger played a huge role in building fences with Jews
I just posted a boatload of links with Jewish leaders saying that they trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. "Building" fences. Yeah, I bet he has. Big, tall ones.
Bet he'll be building all kinds of barriers during his reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
45. I don't think anyone who was not at least 16 years old in 1966
should response to this flame. You don't know what you don't know.

If your thoughts about the Vietnam era are based on what you have read or what you were taught and not on personal experience I repeat, you don't know what you don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. My dad was drafted in '65
I know what I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
54. So when will we be hearing from the Panzer Tank Veterans For Truth?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC