Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has the U.S. secretly approved the "Islamic Bomb" created by

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 08:23 PM
Original message
Has the U.S. secretly approved the "Islamic Bomb" created by
Pakistan's A.Q.Khan and allowed Pakistan to share it with countries like Saudi Arabia/I am asking this question because Bush has allowed his bosom buddy Musharraf to pardon A.Q.Khan and has not made any waves about Saudi Arabia's openly stated intent to acquire nuclear weapons.I smell a rat, a nuclear rat at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. As A Point Of Curiousity, Sir
What do you expect would follow from that, if true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If true,Islamic nations will form a coalition against non Islamic nations
like Israel and India, two of the region's military and nuclear powers.By creating endless destabilization, we stand to benefit as the supplier of arms to all the countries involved, as the recent decision to supply F-16 aircraft to both India and Pakistan shows.In addition, India stands to receive the Patriot Missile system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do You Really Think So, Sir?
Any nuclear exchange would bring practical hostilities to a quick end, and produce a stable state of affairs. The two areas you mention are already chronically unstable, and an excellent argument can be made that, in the case of India v. Pakistan, the presence of nuclear weaponry on both sides tends to have the effect of increasing stability, by rather raising the stakes in the event of hostilities being pushed beyond the inevitable border clashes. The amounts of money involved in the arms contracts you envison are trivial, not even of too great a signifigance for the companies involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I suggest you read the NYT article on this issue two days ago.Far from
being trivial, Lockheed Martin thinks that the sale of F-16 to India can keep its entire production line humming for at least a decade if not longer. In the beginning at least 125 F-16s at $35 million per copy are involved, not a trivial amount in anyone's calculations. With spare parts, weaponry and other electronic Countermeasures India is seeking the contracts are worth several billion dollars.India is also seeking to enter into a technology exchange program with Lockheed to add many more billions to this basic contract. As a country that spends well in excess of 15-20 billion dollars in arms purchases abroad India is a prize that the French, British and the Russians are going eagerly after.If Lockheed lands that it will be a big feather in Bush's cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC