Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if the Secret Service is telling the truth about Gannon?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 05:38 PM
Original message
What if the Secret Service is telling the truth about Gannon?
Frankly, I never bought the idea that Gannon was blackmailing the White House since his presence there was beneficial to the White House. I also was dubious about the notion that he had actually been checked out by the Secret Service. Now, apparently, he was checked out by the Secret Service. Just what does it say that a man engaged in illegal activity, has websites devoted to said illegal activity, and who owes taxes to the state of Delaware can get access to the White House on 150 occasions?

It says we were damn lucky. Instead of a salacious, sad, and bizarely hypocritical story about a White House that knows no bounds in seeding the press with false tales, we could have had a tragic story about a terrorist infultrating the White House and mowing down the head of state. Heck, he could have taken out Blair too. It doesn't take the head writer of 24 to imagine a senario where a terrorist group used a Gannon like figure to wreak havoc upon the White House.

I had honestly hoped that someone snuck this guy in without any Secret Service involvement. It turns out that isn't the case. Either the Secret Service is lying, which I doubt, or our White House security is a total mess. As much fun as the hypocrisy of a pro family party with a homosexual prostitution scandal might be, the real problem here is that in the age of 9/11 our security is total crap. Airport security is literally a joke. Terrorism numbers are worse than any year since 1985. And now, the White House is evidently able to be penetrated by the least well hidden male prositute since Midnight Cowboy. Forget about Bolten for the UN, put him in charge of security. We need someone who kicks ass and takes names in security. In the meantime, the real scandal is that almost 4 years later we apparently haven't learned one thing from 9/11.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. If Bolton is as abusive and bad as they say
(and he apparently is), he isn't good for much of anything except possibly a prison guard...No, after thinking about it, not even that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm more concerned about the other salacious sex story at 1600
The entire nation has now bent over and Bush is our assmaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I wonder
why did they let him through? They were probably told by somebody to let him in. My question's are: 1) Who told them 2) What was he doing in those hours he wasn't in the press room?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Or maybe the WH neocons aren't really worried about terrorism because
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 05:52 PM by satya
the terrorists are working for them? And they're just using fear as a method of controlling the rest of us? (Not to mention the cash cow all this increased "security" has been for some of them).

:tinfoilhat:

Edited to add:
I absolutely agree with you that "the real scandal is that almost 4 years later we apparently haven't learned one thing from 9/11." I'm just not quite sure yet what the lesson is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. What if Bush doesn't like bald heads, he just likes rubbing
head?

What if that wasn't a bald manwhore working in the Whitehouse, a hairy one?

What if Bush could look like a man with out trying to act like one?

Oh the What if's that could have been....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. You might revisit Rawstory's documentation.
Mr. Gannon was in the White House on over 200 occasions. And some of those passes where requested by White House staff. Some of those "visits" were on days when there was no press briefing, and there are other anomalies.

Nobody sneaks into this White House 200 times.

And if anything, it looks like the Secret Service guys were the only ones who did do their job. We don't know what their instructions were with regards to Mr. Gannon. But they did keep records of his movements in the WH.


It's not up to them to make this call. Their job is to check the identity of the guy and weigh in if they believe there is a threat. Put another way, it's unlikely the Mr. Gannon would have gotten in unless someone explicitly instructed the SS to clear him.

We don't know what the SS knew about him except what they've been allowed to release so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought the SS job was to clear these people
I realize that on somethings they can be overruled but on this I thought they had a free reign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No. They're cops, they don't issue invitations. n/t
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 06:46 PM by sfexpat2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What was he doing there?
Shouldn't that be the question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I would think so. Why was this guy in our White House? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. What was he doing there and for whom was he doing it?
Or to whom, as the case may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. This isn't looking good for the Empire, is it?
I'm giving this another 24 hours to get be taken up by the corporate media. If it's not, well, that's another piece of information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. or
who was he doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Exactly
They did keep logs on him so that's something. Who in the White House is allowed to give them orders??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't know and that's an important question.
Andy Card? Rove? Who else besides the Resident and Vice Resident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think it was a matter of security...with them, there are insiders
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 07:13 PM by higher class
and outsiders. Jeff was in.

Hold a free event with Bush speaking...some are in, everyone else is out.

If we knew that he was in the WH on over 200 occasions and the SS hadn't recorded the occasions, we could talk security risk.

The next question to the WH should be - can someone enter the WH with a known person on the pass of the known person.

Then, a question for fun...did he nap in the Lincoln bedroom?

Then, the last question...how upset will the public be? Will they dismiss it even though, to this day, - few dismiss Clinton - even some on DU and all the right wing talking heads.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The only way
people will get upset is if it's talked about on MSM that people watch. Other wise: who would know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. It wasn't a security lapse.
You have to remember what the nashuaadvocate reported a while back that the Daschle campaign found out about Gannon being a former escort well before 2004 and informed various reporters. They did nothing, reported nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. compare his record and his access to the WH
to the access of ordinary citizens to the little bushturd's PR stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. WHY don't they have a record of WHO G/G visited while in the WH?
People can't just check in and wander all over the place Willy Nilly!
Or maybe Willy can!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. depends on whose Willy you're talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. dsc brought up the question of this presidency and that is,
what did we learn from 9/11?

Maybe I'm just out there, but what I've learned is that 1) Bu$hCo can't be trusted and 2) 9/11 gave his administration cover for nearly every one of their abuses.

I trust the SS documentation more than I'd trust anything out of Scott McClellan's mouth any day of the week.

What the Cabal learned was that they had a handy hammer for anyone who gets out of line. Two hammers, if you count their pimping Fristianity.

Some smart reporter (broad hint) needs to chart who in the WH can approve passes. The SS clears them for risk of threat, but there must be a short list somewhere of who can generate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. The real story is that a Male Prostitute for Hire was accepted by the SS..
and had access to the WH anytime he wanted. Forget his Press Creditians crap and the missing sign in's and sign outs, the guy had access anytime he wanted to the WH and that means he was INVITED/WELCOME...A BIG SIGN!

WELCOME JIMMY/JEFF WE ALL NEED YOUR "SERVICE."

How much plainer does it have to get that this is no Monica Gate...this is a Male Advertiser on Porn Sites of his 8 1/2 inch "cut" and "top only" who pretended he was a journalist and was in there doing "something to or for "someone." :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I suspect he had access in other places
besides the White House, and that may be why there is no-one squawking about this obvious breach (a security breach, a breach of etiquette, whatever). Didn't he mention Biden on his website? And I've heard Barney Frank's name being tossed around as well.
If this ever does develop into anything, it could be very interesting, and complicated for a lot of people (but I doubt that it will). Of course, what do I know? We all thought Monica was a silly story that wouldn't matter to real intelligent people in the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes...sadly he probably did and that's why it goes nowhere. But, if folks
are covering up for him then what the hell else are they covering. We need to clean it out, but I suspect like you we probably won't be able to do it without alot of help from the MSM..and they may be involved, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Life support needed for this story
Unless the major media picks up on this, it will just be another story on the blogs with a dozen or so minor media people reporting it. Nobody wants to touch it, it seems. Is thier anyone on DU who actually knows someone invovled with a major media group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. One wonders just which Busheviks Gannon was "pitching" to
Or maybe "catching". These are some of the world's most powerful monsters since the Nazis, and they might want to be on top like Ernst Roehm, not a Bottom like Horst Wessel.

Almost no question now Gannon was servicing one of more of the High Busheviks.

Isn't it simply astonishing how many homophobes are also secret homosexuals?

Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. wouldnt Moore or Stewart be getting invovled
Wouldnt Michael Moore or Jon Stewart be shouting this out from the rooftops if it could hurt Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC