ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:16 PM
Original message |
I am so sick of the arguement "He's already been confirmed by the Senate |
|
4 times before.
They use this for their judicial appointments and now Bolton B* said this repeatedly last night.
Well, Mr. President, in the Senate they have a saying, Maybe you have it in the White House too (Oh hell, no you don't):
'Fool me three times, shame, shame, shame on me. Fool me four times . . . won't be fooled again.'
|
YusefHawkins
(79 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not to be the UN Embassador he hasn't . |
|
Different job Chimperial Monkey Boy.
|
sui generis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message |
2. . . . so just give up! you're too late! |
|
I wonder if they ever hear themselves. "It's too late. We've already cheated, and you're too late."
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Wasn't JimmyJeff denied a press pass by the Congress? |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I got a job working in a grocery store once |
|
Since my bosses approved me for that can I be a supreme court judge?
It is a stupid argument.
|
merbex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I see where you are gtoing with this; I never thought of it that |
|
way
So he was confirmed by the Senate previously- doesn't new information count?
Imagine someone being confirmed for a post,serving and then going back to private life where they engage in questionable activities
Called to serve again. Are those questionable activities off limits because that person has already been confirmed,albeit for a different job?
Their argument,like their agenda and their nominee is beyond words. Arrogant, self-serving and stupid do come to mind though
|
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. They keep making that arguement |
deacon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-29-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I'm sick of 'we want to do something but we want the dems to come up |
|
with the plan'--this is REALLY worn out.
|
ashling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-30-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. The Rethuglicans AND the MSM |
|
... OK, so that is redundant - both think that the Rethugs are "the party of big ideas"
:grr:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message |