Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only an IOU?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Jacobin Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:48 PM
Original message
Only an IOU?
Sweet Jesus the president is a moron.

Does that moron have any idea what he said last night? He claimed that the Social Security Administration doesn't really have any money - just a bunch of IOUs.

A bunch of IOUs?

They hold Treasury Bonds for Christ's sake! Those are just a bunch of IOUs?

Has the president really suggested that the best backed treasury security in the entire world is just a piece of paper that may or may not be payable (depending on if the repugs feel like it)?

I pulled out a savings bond and a $20. That moron does realize that neither are backed by gold, right? He does realize that they are just backed by the "full faith and credit" of the United States, right?

He does realize that he just claimed that the "full faith and credit" of the United States is nothing but an IOU, a scrap of paper?

Idiots on rapture radio can spew this to their choir all day without any serious harm, but the president?

When will China start to agree with him and stop buying all our Iraqi War debt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. What did you expect, intelligence?
Bush doesn't realize the sun rises, unless someone tells him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, t-bills are IOUs
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 05:54 PM by Worst Username Ever
All bonds are. They are a loan, an IOU to pay you back with interest. The social security fund does not actually hold cash, the government spends it, puts t-bills in instead (Basically loaning ITSELF money from the fund, promising to pay it back later) and then pays it back with income taxes at a later date.

People have a tendancy to put too much faith in government securities. The full-faith and credit of the US doesn't mean much if Bush bankrupts it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely (especially the part about bankrupting it)
Wonder if his own personal savings are in EUROS or YEN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But...but...but...he *said* he wouldn't let the government spend that
in January of 2000!

JIM LEHRER: Yesterday, Governor George W. Bush had a town meeting in Londonderry, New Hampshire.

GOV. GEORGE W. BUSH: We're in a tax debate here in this state and around the country. And let me explain my position as clearly as I can. First, unspent surpluses in Washington, D.C. will be spent, you mark my words, you leave money sitting around the table in Washington, Washington politicians will spend it. Now, I believe there's enough money. If you lockbox the payroll taxes, there is $2 trillion to make sure the Social Security system is safe and secure-- $2 trillion.

I intend to lockbox the payroll taxes and spend them only on what they're supposed to be spent on, and that's Social Security.


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june00/gop_stump_1-14.html


How did they spend two trillion from shrub's lockbox without shrub's permission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL
Great find, who woulda thunk that GWB would be lackadaisical with the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. And in his next breath
last night he said that those who do not prefer to invest in the stock market for their private accounts could buy Treasury Bonds which, he said, were backed by that "full faith and credit" bullshit.

You can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC