TheoryThey have a jail full of petty thieves in Pakistan. Hell, they may even be ISI people, since we never hear much about their trials and punishment. Anyway, anytime the chimp's ratings are looking really bad or they need some good news on the terror front to take attention from really bad news, they can trot out one of these guys (this one's for Tony).
Reuters and AP put in their headlines all over the world, and they trot out company men on the talk shows to say how great this is. Trouble is, there's too many people involved and they keep getting the details confused. This should alert the press, but they just print whatever the DOD gives them.
EvidenceInconsistencies making this seem phoney.1. This guy is supposedly the #3 guy, right? Just read the headlines:
http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&gl=us&ncl=http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1115207441353_38/%3Fhub%3DCTVNewsAt11&sa=N&start=0But it's the Americans saying this. Other intel agencies dispute this:
However, some European and Middle Eastern intelligence officials raised questions about Mr. Libbi's importance to the Qaeda organization.
Three officials said they were surprised to hear senior officials in the United States and Pakistan characterize Mr. Libbi as a highly ranked Qaeda commander. One Middle Eastern intelligence official said: "We don't have information that this man is or was the No. 3 man of Al Qaeda. This man was important for operations in Pakistan, but he is not the No. 3 man in the organization."
A senior German official suggested there may have been some confusion with Abu al-Liby, a Libyan-born senior Qaeda commander who was indicted for an "operational role" in the August 1998 bombings of two American embassies in east Africa. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/04/international/asia/04cnd-pakistan.html?hp&ex=1115265600&en=e190d5eb9d779215&ei=5094&partner=homepage2. Next look at where he was caught. Pakistani intel officials can't agree. Some say South Waziristan; some say 350 miles away. That's a big enough difference for this to be a farce.
Intelligence officials said Liby was caught in the tribal region of South Waziristan, where hundreds of al Qaeda militants and their local supporters have been fighting Pakistani security forces since early 2004.
But another intelligence official said the terror mastermind was arrested on the outskirts of Mardan — a town in North West Frontier province — around 350 km north of South Waziristan. Nightline had former CIA operative Gary Schroen (who led the hunt for Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks) on plugging the official story, but he too contradicted Pakistani officials on where the guy was caught:
KOPPEL:
It's right along the border with Afghanistan?SCHROEN:
It's along the border of Afghanistan, but north of Peshawar, far north of Waziristan, where we have been looking for bin Laden.
And I have for years thought that, that was the area that bin Laden would have chosen to hide, and I think because it is a rugged, really rough area where the tribals hate any form of government, Pakistani or U.S. or Afghan, and would be perfectly willing to support someone of bin Laden's caliber and with a checkbook of his size, and I believed he's been up there.
So the capture in Bashour (ph) I think is significant.http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/story?id=728820&page=1But of course, this conflicts with whatPakistan's information minister and interior minister have said:
Officials gave conflicting accounts of where Farj, the country's most wanted fugitive, was arrested. Ahmed and Interior Minister Aftab Sherpao said he was picked up in South Waziristan, an unruly tribal region on the Afghan border. It is thought to be a possible hiding place for Bin Laden.http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-050405qaeda_lat,0,3429999.story?coll=la-home-headlines3. Next, for a guy so important, you'd think he might be on the US most wanted list, right. Nope. He wasn't. Curious, that.
Reuters:
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/may52005/foreign173218200554.aspConclusionIt's fake. But they don't care. They can contradict each other in the same article about something as basic as where he was caught. The bullshit meter is off the scale and the press dutifully print what ever the DOD submits.
Fake Fake Fake Fake